, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 995–1001 | Cite as

The hydroacoustic method for the quantification of the gas flux from a submersed bubble plume

  • S. I. Muyakshin
  • E. Sauter
Instruments and Methods


This article presents an inverse hydroacoustic method for the remote quantification of the total gas flux transported from an underwater bubble plume. The method includes the surveying of the bubble plume by a vertically looking echo sounder and the calculation of the flux using the spatial distribution of the ultrasound backscattering at a fixed depth. A simplified parameterization containing only a few parameters is introduced to describe the empirical bubble size distribution. The linear correlation between the backscattering cross section of the bubble stream and the vertical gas flux is found. The calculation procedure takes into account the occurrence of a gas hydrate film at the bubble’s surface. The influence of different parameters on the accuracy of the method is investigated. The resolution volume of the echo sounder corresponding to the fixed distance is considered as a two-dimensional spatial window. The method was applied to quantify the total convective methane flux at the Haakon-Mosby mud volcano (HMMV) depth 1280 m. The calculated values of the total flux near the bottom (100–400 t/year) are in good agreement with the independently estimated flux for the single bubble jet observed from the ROV (70 t/year). These calculations also show significant temporal variability of the flux at the HMMV. The total flux was found to vary by about a factor of 2–3 within time scales of days.


Scatter Cross Section Methane Flux Bubble Size Distribution Directivity Diagram Bubble Plume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. K. Goncharov and N. Yu. Klement’eva, “Modeling the Dynamics and Conditions of Sonic Scattering of Gas Bubbles Coming to the Surface from Great Depths in the Sea in the Area of Oil and Gas Fields,” Akust. Zh. 42(3), 371–377 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Sauter, A. Betius, E. Damm, et al., “Some Results of Echolocation Shooting of the Source of Methane Associated with Deep-Sea Mud Volcano ‘Hakon Mosbi’,” in Collected Papers of XV Session of RAO (Nizhnii Novgorod, 2003), Vol. 2, pp. 165–168 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. P. Zonnenshain, I. O. Murdmaa, B. V. Baranov, et al., “Underwater Gas Source in the Sea of Okhotsk to the West of the Island of Paramushir,” Okeanologiya 27(5), 795–800 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Klei and G. Medvin, Acoustic Oceanography (MIR, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. O. Maksimov and E. V. Sosedko, “Dynamics of Vesicles Coated with a Gas-Hydrate Shell,” in Collected Papers of XVI Session of RAO (GEOS, Moscow, 2004), Vol. 2, pp. 234–237 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monitoring of Methane in the Sea of Okhotsk, Ed. by A. Obzhirov et al. (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. I. Muyakshin and E. Sauter, “Echolocation Method for Determining the Gas Flow from the Source of the Underwater Bubbles,” in Collected Papers of XIX Session of RAO (GEOS, Moscow, 2007), Vol. 2, pp. 50–53 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. S. Salomatin and V. I. Yusupov, “Quantitative Assessment of “Gas Torch” Parameters with a Sonar,” in Collected Papers of XVI Session of RAO (GEOS, Moscow, 2004), Vol. 2, pp. 230–233 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Greinert and B. Nuetzel, “Hydroacoustic Experiments to Establish a Method for the Determination of Methane Bubble Fluxes at Cold Seeps,” Geo-Mar. Lett. 24, 75–85, doi:10.1007/s0367-003-0165-7 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Greinert, Y. Artemov, L. Naudts, and M. De Batist, “Methane ‘Bubble’ Seeps in the Black Sea and Approaches for a Hydroacoustic Methane Flux Determination,” in Proc. of the 7 European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004 (Delft, The Nethterlands, 2004), Vol. 2, pp. 863–868.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Greinert, Yu. Artemov, V. Egorov, et al., “1300-m-High Rising Bubbles from Mud Volcanoes at 2080m in the Black Sea: Hydroacoustic Characteristics and Temporal Variability,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 244, 1–15 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. U. Heeschen, R. W. Collier, M. A. de Angelis, et al., “Methane Sources, Distribution and Fluxes from Cold Vent Sites at Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia Margin,” Global Biochem. Cycles 19, GB2016, doi: 1029/2004GB002266 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. S. Hornafius, D. Quigley, and B. P. Luyendyk, “The World’s Most Spectacular Marine Hydrocarbon Seeps (Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara Channel, California): Quantification of Emission,” J. Geophys. Res. 104(C9), 20703–20711 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Leifer and A. G. Judd, “Oceanic Methane Layers: The Hydrocarbon Seep Bubble Deposition Hypothesis,” Terra Nova 14(6), 417–424 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Leifer and R. K. Patro, “The Bubble Mechanism for Methane Transport from the Shallow Sea Bed to the Surface: A Review and Sensitivity Study,” Cont. Shelf Res. 22, 2409–2428 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Merewether, M. S. Olsson, and P. Lonsdale, “Acoustically Detected Hydrocarbon Plumes Rising from 2-km Depth in Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California,” J. Geopys. Res. 90(B4), 3075–3085 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Rehder, P. W. Brewer, E. T. Peltzer, and G. Friedrich, “Enhanced Lifetime of Methane Bubble Streams within the Deep Ocean,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(15) doi: 10.1029/2001GL013966, (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. J. Sauter, S. Muyakshin, J.-L. Charlou, et al., “Methane Discharge from a Deep-Sea Submarine Mud Volcano into the Upper Water Column by Gas Hydrate-Coated Methane Bubbles,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 243, 354–365 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lobachevski State University of Nizhni NovgorodNizhni NovgorodRussia
  2. 2.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations