Oceanology

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 797–813 | Cite as

Quantitative distribution of meiobenthos in deep-water zones of the World Ocean

  • V. O. Mokievskii
  • A. A. Udalov
  • A. I. Azovskii
Marine Biology

Abstract

An analysis of published and original data on the meiobenthos abundance in the depth interval from 100 to 9807 m (in total, 665 records, 445 of them obtained for depths exceeding 1000 m) revealed general regularities in its distribution. The influence of the sampling and data processing methods on the quantitative estimates of the meiobenthos abundance is considered to demonstrate changes in the proportions of the main meiobenthic taxa at different depths and to characterize latitudinal changes in the meiobenthos abundance. The dependence of the abundance of free-living nematodes, the most abundant group of metazoan meiobenthos, on trophic conditions is analyzed. No significant differences in the meiobenthos abundance in the samples obtained by box-and multicorers are established. It is shown that the share of nematodes in metazoan meiobenthos communities increases with the depth. In temperate latitudes, a distinct maximum in the population density confined to depths exceeding 1 km is observed. The quantitative distribution of the meiobenthos at the depths gradient is controlled by the bottom macrotopography and trophic conditions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. V. Burkovskii, A. P. Stolyarov, and M. Yu. Kolobov, “Spatial Organization and Functioning of a Marine (Estuarine) Ecosystem,” Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 122(4), 316–325 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. A. Zenkevich, Z. A. Filatova, G. M. Belyaev, et al., “Quantitative Distribution of Zoobenthos in the World Ocean,” Byull. MOIP, Otd. Biol, No. 3, 27–33 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. O. Mokievskii, A. A. Udalov, and A. I. Azovskii, “On the Quantitative Distribution of Meiobenthos on the Shelf of the World Ocean,” Okeanologiya 44(1), 110–120 (2004) [Oceanology 44 (1), 99–109 (2004)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. A. Romankevich, Geochemistry of Organic Matter in the Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. A. Udalov, I. V. Burkovskii, A. I. Azovskii, and E. S. Chertoprud, “Effect of Experimental Increase of Meiobenthos Density on the Estuarine Intertidal Community in the White Sea,” Okeanologiya 42(1), 106–115 (2002) [Oceanology 42 (1), 99–108 (2002)].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. M. Alongi, “Intertidal Zonation and Seasonality of Meiobenthos in Tropical Mangrove Estuaries,” Mar. Biol. 95, 447–458 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. M. Alongi, “Bathymetric Patterns of Deep-Sea Benthic Communities from Bathyal to Abyssal Depths in the Western South Pacific (Solomon and Coral Seas),” Deep-Sea Res. 39, 549–565 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. M. Alongi and M. Pichon, “Bathyal Meiobenthos of the Western Coral Sea: Distribution and Abundance in Relation to Microbial Standing Stocks and Environmental Factors,” Deep-Sea Res. Ser. A: Oceanography Research Papers 35(4), 491–503 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Ankar and R. Elmgren, “The Benthic Macro-and Meiofauna of the Asko-Landsort area (Northern Baltic Proper): A Stratified Random Sampling Survey,” Contributions from the Asko Laboratory 11, 11–15 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. A. Anzari, “Distribution of Deep-Sea Benthos in the Proposed Mining Area of Central Indian Basin,” Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 18, 201–207 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. A. Ansari, A. H. Parulekar, and T. G. Jagtap, “Distribution of Sub-Littoral Meiobenthos off Goa Coast, India,” Hydrobiologia 74(3), 209–214 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Asmus and R. Asmus, “Trophic Relationships in Tidal Flat Areas: To What Extent Are Tidal Flats Dependent on Imported Food?” Neth. J. Sea Res. 27(1), 93–99 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Auffret, “Environnement Morphologique et Sedimentologique,” in Peuplements Profonds du Golfe de Gascogne, Ed. by L. Laubier and C. Monniot (IFREMER, Paris, 1985) pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. C. Austen, “Factors Affecting Estuarine Meiobenthic Assemblage Structure: A Multifactorial Microcosm Experiment,” J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 130(2), 167–187 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. C. Austen and R. M. Warwick, “Effects of Manipulation of Food Supply on Estuarine Meiobenthos,” Hydrobiologia 311(1–3), 175–184 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. R. O. Barnett, J. Watson, and D. Conelly, “A Multiple Corer for Taking Virtually Undisturbed Samples from Shelf, Bathyal, and Abyssal Sediments,” Oceanol. Acta 7, 399–408 (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. H. Berger, “Global Maps of Ocean Productivity,” in Productivity of the Ocean: Past and Present (Dahlem Workshop Repot 44), Ed. by W. H. Berger et al. (John Wiley, Chichester, 1989), pp. 429–455.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. J. Bett, A. Vanreusel, M. Vincx, et al., “Sampler Bias in the Quantitative Study of Deep-Sea Meiobenthos,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 104, 197–203 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. S. M. Billett, R. S. Lampitt, A. L. Rice, and R. C. F. Mantoura, “Seasonal Sedimentation of Phytoplankton to the Deep-Sea Benthos,” Nature 302, 520–522 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Boetius, S. Scheibe, A. Tselepides, and H. Thiel, “Microbial Biomass and Activities in Deep-Sea Sediments of the Eastern Mediterranean: Trenches Are the Benthic Hotspots,” Deep-Sea Res. 43, 1439–1460 (1996).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Danovaro, C. Gambi, and Croce N. Della, “Meiofauna Hotspot in the Atacama Trench, Eastern South Pacific Ocean,” Deep-Sea Res. 49 Part I, 843–857 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Danovaro, A. Tselepides, A. Otegui, and Croce N. Della, “Dynamics of Meiofaunal Assemblages on the Continental Shelf and Deep-Sea Sediments of the Cretan Sea (NE Mediterranean): Relationships with Seasonal Changes in Food Supply,” Progr. Oceanogr. 46, 367–400 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. W. Deming and J. A. Baross, “The Early Diagenesis of Organic Matter: Bacterial Activity,” in Organic Geochemistry: Principles and Applications, Ed. by M. H. Engel and S. Macko (Plenum, New York, 1993), pp. 119–144.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. O. Emery and E. Uchupi, The Geology of the Atlantic Ocean (Springer, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Galleron, M. Sibuet, M. L. Mahaut, and A. Dinet, “Variation in Structure and Biomass of the Benthic Communities at Three Contrasting Sites in the Tropical Northeast Atlantic,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 197, 121–137 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. J. Gooday, “Meiofaunal Foraminiferas from the Bathyal Porcupine Seabight: Size Structure, Taxonomic Composition, Species Diversity, and Vertical Distribution in the Sediment,” Deep-Sea Res. 33, 1345–1372 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. J. Gooday, A. J. Hughes, and L. A. Levin, “The Foraminiferal Macrofauna from Three North Carolina (USA) Slope Sites with Contrasting Carbon Flux: A Comparison with the Metazoan Macrofauna,” Deep-Sea Res. 48 Part I, 1709–1739 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. S. Ingole, Z. A. Anzari, V. Rathod, and N. Rodrigues, “Responce of Meiofauna to Immediate Benthic Disturbance in the Central Indian Ocean Basin,” Marine Georesourses and Geotechnology 18, 263–272 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Jensen, “Measuring Carbon Content in Nematodes,” Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 38, 83–86 (1984).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Jensen, J. Rumohr, and G. Graf, “Sedimentological and Biological Differences across a Deep-Sea Ridge Exposed to Advection and Accumulation of Fine-Grained Particles,” Oceanol. Acta 15, 287–296 (1992).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. J. D. Lambshead, “Recent Developments in Marine Benthic Biodiversity Research,” Oceanis 19(6), 5–24 (1993).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. R. Parsons, M. Takahashi, and B. Hargrave, Biological Oceanographic Process (Permagon Press, Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    O. Pfannkuche and H. Thiel, “Meiobenthic Stocks and Benthic Activity on the NE-Svalbard Shelf and in the Nansen Basin,” Polar Biology 7, 253–266 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Raghukumar, P. A. Loka Bharathi, Z. A. Anzari, et al., “Bacterial Standing Stock, Meiofauna, and Sediment-Nutrient Characteristics: Indicators of Benthic Disturbance in the Central Indian Basin,” Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 48, 3381–3399 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Renaud-Mornant and N. Gourbault, “Evaluation of Abyssal Meiobenthos in the Eastern Central Pacific (Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone),” Progr. Oceanogr. 24, 317–329 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. A. Riley, “Transparency-Chlorophyll Relations,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 150–152 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    I. Schewe, “Small-Sized Benthic Organisms of the Alpha Ridge, Central Arctic Ocean,” Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie 86, 317–335 (2001).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. Schewe and T. Soltwedel, “Deep-Sea Meiobenthos of the Central Arctic Ocean: Distribution Patterns and Size-Structure Under Extreme Oligotrophic Conditions,” Vie et Milieu 49(2/3), 79–92 (1999).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Schriever, C. Bussau, and H. Thiel, “DISCOL—Precautionary Environmental Impact Studies for Future Manganese Nodule Mining and First Results on Meiofauna Abundance,” Proceedings and Advances of the Marine Technology Conference 4, 47–57 (1991).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Shirayama, “The Abundance of Deep Sea Meiobenthos in the Western Pacific in Relation to Environmental Factors,” Oceanol. Acta 7, 113–121 (1984).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    K. Soetaert, C. Heip, and M. Vincx, “The Meiobenthos along a Mediterranean Deep-Sea Transect off Calvi (Corsica) and in an Adjacent Canyon,” Marine Ecology 12, 227–242 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    T. Soltwedel, “Meiobenthos Distribution Pattern in the Tropical East Atlantic: Indication for Fractionated Sedimentation of Organic Matter to the Sea Floor?” Mar. Biol. 129, 747–756 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    T. Soltwedel, “Metazoan Meiobenthos along Continental Margins: A Review,” Progr. Oceanogr. 46, 59–84 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    T. Soltwedel, V. Mokievsky, and I. Schewe, “Benthic Activity and Biomass on the Yermak Plateau and in Adjacent Deep-Sea Regions Northwest of Svalbard,” Deep-Sea Res. 47 Part I, 1761–1785 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    T. Soltwedel, M. Miljutina, V. Mokievsky, et al., “The Meiobenthos of the Molloy Deep (5600 m), Fram Strait, Arctic Ocean,” Vie et Milieu 53, 1–13 (2003).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Thiel, “Quantitative Untersuchungen Uber die Meiofauna des Tiefseebodens,” Veroff. Inst. Meeresforsh. Bremerhaven 2, 131–148 (1966).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    H. Thiel, “Meiofauna und Struktur der Benthischen Lebensgemeinschaft des Iberischen Tiefseebeckens,” Meteor Forsch. Ergebnisse D, No. 12, 36–51 (1972).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H. Thiel, “The Size Structure of Deep-Sea Benthos,” Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie 60, 575–606 (1975).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    H. Thiel, “First Quantitative Data on Red Sea Deep Benthos,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 1, 347–350 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    H. Thiel, The Sea, Ed. by G. T. Rowe (J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1983), pp. 167–230.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    D. Thistle, “Harpacticoid Copepods Are Succesful in the Soft-Bottom Deep Sea,” Hydrobiologia 453/454, 255–259 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. H. Tietjen, “Ecology and Distribution of Deep Sea Meiobenthos Off N. Carolina,” Deep-Sea Res. 18, 941–957 (1971).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. A. Udalov, A. I. Azovsky, and V. O. Mokievsky, “Depth-Related Pattern in Nematode Size: What Does the Depth Itself Really Mean?” Progr. in Oceanogr. 67, 1–23 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    J. Vanaverbeke, P. M. Arbizu, H.-U. Dahms, and H. K. Schminke, “The Metazoan Meiobenthos along a Depth Gradient in the Arctic Laptev Sea with Special Attention to Nematode Communities,” Polar Biology 18, 391–401 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    J. Vanaverbeke, K. Soetaert, C. Heip, and A. Vanreusel, “The Metazoan Meiobenthos along the Continental Slope of the Goban Spur (NE Atlantic),” J. Sea Res. 38, 93–107 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    S. Vanhove, W. Arntz, and M. Vincx, “Comparative Study of the Nematode Communities on the Southeastern Weddell Sea Shelf and Slope (Antarctica),” Marine Ecology Progress Series 181, 237–256 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. Vanreusel, L. Clough, K. Jacobsen, et al., “Meiobenthos of the Central Arctic Ocean with Special Emphasis on the Nematode Community Structure,” Deep Sea Res. 47 Part I, 1855–1879 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    M. Vincx, B. J. Bett, A. Dinet, et al., “Meiobenthos of the Deep Northeast Atlantic,” Advance in Marine Biology 30, 2–88 (1994).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    B. Widbom, “Determination of Average Individual Dry Weights and Ash-Free Dry Weights in Different Sieve Fractions of Marine Meiofauna,” Mar. Biol. 84, 101–108 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    W. Wieser, “Benthic Studies in Buzzards Bay. II. The Meiofauna,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 5, 121–137 (1960).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. L. Wigley and A. D. McInyre, “Some Quantitative Comparisons of Offshore Meiobenthos and Macrobenthos South of Marta’s Vineyard,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 9, 485–493 (1964).Google Scholar
  62. 62.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. O. Mokievskii
    • 1
  • A. A. Udalov
    • 1
  • A. I. Azovskii
    • 2
  1. 1.Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Biological FacultyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations