Advertisement

Mathematical Notes

, Volume 103, Issue 3–4, pp 337–347 | Cite as

A Functional Limit Theorem for Decomposable Branching Processes with Two Particle Types

  • V. I. Afanas’ev
Article

Abstract

A decomposable Galton–Watson branching process with two particle types is studied. It is assumed that the particles of the first type produce equal numbers of particles of the first and second types, while the particles of the second type produce only particles of their own type. Under the condition that the total number of particles of the second type is greater than N →∞, a functional limit theorem for the process describing the number of particles of the first type in different generations is proved.

Keywords

decomposable Galton–Watson branching process local time of a Brownian excursion functional limit theorems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. A. Vatutin and E. E. D’yakonova, “Decomposable branching processes with a fixed extinction moment,” in Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklova, Vol. 290: Topical Problems of Mathematics, Mechanics and Mathematical Physics (MAIK, Moscow, 2015), pp. 114–135 [Proc. Steklov Inst.Math. 290 (1), 103–124 (2015)].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Vatutin and E. E. D’yakonova, “Extinction of decomposable branching processes,” Diskret. Mat. 27 (4), 26–37 (2015) [DiscreteMath. Appl. 26 (3), 183–192 (2016)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Afanas’ev, “Functional limit theorems for the decomposable branching process with two types of particles,” Diskret.Mat. 27 (2), 22–44 (2015) [DiscreteMath. Appl. Diskret.Mat. 26 (2), 71–88 (2016)].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. A. Vatutin, “A Conditional Functional Limit Theorem for Decomposable Branching Processes with Two Types of Particles,” Mat. Zametki 101 (5), 669–683 (2017) [Math. Notes 101 (5), 778–789 (2017)].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. I. Afanas’ev, “On a decomposable branching process with two types of particles,” in Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklova, Vol. 294: Topical Problems of Mathematics, Mechanics and Mathematical Physics. II (MAIK, Moscow, 2016), pp. 7–19 [Proc. Steklov Inst.Math. 294, 1–12 (2016)].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Drmota and B. Gittenberger, “On the profile of random trees,” Random Structures Algorithms 10 (4), 421–451 (1997).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Drmota, Random Trees. An Interplay Between Combinatorics and Probability (Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 2009).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. T. Durrett and D. L. Iglehart, “Functionals of Brownian excursion,” Ann. Probability 5 (1), 130–135 (1977).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. F. Kolchin, Random Mappings, in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (Nauka, Moscow, 1984; Optimization Software, Inc., Publications Division, New York, 1986).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. B. Dwight, Tables of Integrals and Other Mathematical Data, 4th ed. (Macmillan, New York, 1961; Nauka, Moscow, 1983).zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations