Advertisement

Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 867–878 | Cite as

On the Devastating Earthquake at the Iran–Iraq Border

  • E. A. RogozhinEmail author
  • A. L. Sobisevich
  • L. E. Sobisevich
  • K. Kh. Kanonidi
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The process of the lead up and development of a catastrophic seismic event that affected the Earth’s crust and the upper mantle, which led to a change in the natural environment in the western part of the Zagros folded mountain belt, is analyzed. The macroseismic effect, the focal mechanism, the aftershock sequence, the seismotectonic position of the epicentral area, and other parameters characterizing the features of the zone of this catastrophic earthquake with magnitude М = 7.4 that occurred near the Iran–Iraq border on November 12, 2017, are described. In one settlement (Iraq, the city of Dzharband khan), a macroseismic effect corresponding to 9-points according to the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale is recorded. An area of about 150 × 100 km2 underwent impacts of 7–8 points, tremors with the intensity of 5–6 points covered an extensive area of about 800 × 700 km2, and 4- to 5-point impacts were observed all over western Iran and eastern Iraq and appeared in major cities such as Tehran, Baghdad, Kirkuk, Ahvad, and Pasht. In the period from November 12, 2017, until January 21, 2018, more than 50 aftershocks with magnitude mb = 4.2–5.6 were registered in the epicenter zone of the earthquake according to data from the Federal Research Center Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). Their epicentral area extended in the near-meridional direction along the Iraq–Iran border, primarily to the south from the epicenter of the main shock. Its length reached about 210 km and width was about 60 km. The position of the epicentral field of the aftershocks makes it possible to associate the earthquake focus of November 12, 2017, with the Khanaqin fault zone of the meridional strike and dextral strike-slip kinematics. The fault crosses Zagros diagonally near the Iran–Iraq border. Given that the size of the earthquake focus is established by the distribution of epicenters of the aftershocks, it covered the Khanaqin fault zone almost over its entire length. Sufficient attention is paid to the identified prognostic effects. The data of observations from geophysical observatories reflecting the processes of earthquake lead up and development are presented. Before the earthquake of November 12, 2017, the information and measuring systems of the North Caucasus geophysical observatory of Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, RAS, had recorded gravitomagnetic disturbances of the ultralow frequency range. These prognostic effects appeared a few hours before the main shock. The conditions of the origination and development of seismogravity and gravitomagnetic disturbances are specified. In light of the presented material, it becomes clear that the experimental study of a separate class of fundamental gravitomagnetism problems identified in recent years is a defining problem of geophysics today. The gravitomagnetic disturbances in the lithosphere and other geospheres of the Earth recorded at large distances from the focal area can be considered a source of information on the time of appearance of the main high-magnitude shock. To use these effects for a real prediction of the expected magnitude and location and time of the pending earthquake, it is apparently necessary to develop a monitoring network at the observatory equipped with specialized measuring systems that can detect weak gravitomagnetic and seismogravity signals in the high-interference signaling environment on the Earth.

Keywords:

natural environment Iran Iraq Zagros focus earthquake focal mechanism solution seismotectonics deformation fold fault aftershock seismogravity and gravitomagnetic disturbances 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

It is a great privilege for us to appreciate our outstanding scientist Doctor of Physics and Mathematics V.V. Kuz’minov for continuously supporting the activities at the North Caucasus Geophysical Observatory, Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, RAS, since the first two laboratories were established in 2000 at the tunnels of the unique Baksan Neutrino Observatory of Institute for Nuclear Research, RAS, which has been under his permanent management.

This work was supported by a grant from the president of the Russian Federation to support scientific schools, no. NSh-5545.2018.5.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Abbot, B.P., Abbot, R., Abbot, T.D., et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, vol. 116, no. 6, 061102. doi 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambraseys, N. and Melville, C., A history of Persian earthquakes, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachmanov, D.M., Trifonov, V.G., Hessami, K., Kozhurin, A.I., Ivanova, T.P., Rogozhin, E.A., Hademi, M.C., and Jamali, F.H., Active faults in the Zagros and central Iran, Tectonophysics, 2004, vol. 380, pp. 221–241. doi 10.1016/j.tecto.2003.09.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barsukov, O.M., Solar flares, sudden commencements, and earthquakes, Fiz. Zemli, 1991, no. 2, pp. 93–96.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berberian, M., Contribution to the Seismotectonics of Iran (Part II), Geol. Surv. of Iran, 1976, Rep. no. 39.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berberian, M., Master “blind” thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: Active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics, Tectonophysics, 1995, vol. 241, pp. 193–224. doi 10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berberian, M., Petrie, C.A., Potts, D.T., Asgari, Chverdi, A., Dusting, A., Sardari, ZarchiA., Weeks, L., Ghassemi, P., and Noruzi, R., Archaeoseismicity of the mounds and monuments along the Kazerun fault (Western Zagros, SW Iranian plateau) since the Chalcolithic Period, Iran. Antiqua, 2014, vol. 49. doi 10.2143/IA.49.0.3009238Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fraser-Smith, A.C., Ultralow-frequency magnetic fields preceding large earthquakes, EOS, 2008, vol. 89, no. 23, p. 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gokhberg, M.B. and Shalimov, S.L., Vozdeistvie zemletryasenii i vzryvov na ionosferu (Influence of Earthquakes and Explosions on the Ionosphere), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guglielmi, A.V., Ultra-low-frequency electromagnetic waves in the Earth’s crust and magnetosphere, Phys. Usp., 2007, vol. 50, pp. 1197–1216. doi 10.1070/ PU2007v050n12ABEH006413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guglielmi, A.V., Sobisevich, L.E., Sobisevich, A.L., and Lavrov, I.P., Foreshocks of strong earthquakes, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 501–507. doi 10.1134/S1069351314040053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guglielmi, A.V., Lavrov, I.P., and Sobisevich, A.L., Storm sudden commencements and earthquakes, Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 98–103. https://elibrary. ru/item.asp?id=25272092.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hessami, K., Koyi, H.A., and Talbot, C.J., The significance of strike-slip faulting in the basement of the Zagros fold and thrust belt, J. Petrol. Geol., 2001, vol. 24, pp. 5–28. doi 10.1111/j.1747-5457.2001.tb00659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kopytenko, Yu.A., Ismagilov, V.S., Kopytenko, E.A., Voronov, P.M., and Zaitsev, D.B., Magnetic location of geomagnetic disturbance sources, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2000, vol. 371, no. 3, pp. 569–571.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin’kov, E.M., Petrova, L.N., Savina, N.G., and Yanovskaya, T.B., Ultralong-period oscillations of the Earth, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1982, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 321–324.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin’kov, E.M., Petrova, L.N., and Osipov, K.Ts., Seismogravity pulsations of the Earth and atmospheric disturbances as a possible precursor of strong earthquakes, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1990, no. 5, pp. 1095–1098.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liperovskii, V.A., Gladyshev, V.A., and Shalimov, S.S., Lithosphere–ionosphere relations before earthquakes, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, 1991, no. 3, pp. 26–35.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogozhin, E.A., Seismotectonic features of the September 24, 1999 Ahram earthquake in the Zagros, Iran, Geotectonics, 2012a, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 369–378. doi 10.1134/S0016852112050044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogozhin, E.A., Ocherki regional’noi seismotektoniki (An Outline of Regional Seismotectonics), Moscow: IFZ RAN, 2012b.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogozhin, E.A. and Sobisevich, L.E., Wave disturbances induced by crustal earthquakes: Case study of two strong earthquakes in the Caucasian–Anatolian sector of the Alpine Mediterranean mobile belt, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 296–304. doi 10.1134/S1069351314020086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rogozhin, E.A., Lutikov, A.I., Sobisevich, L.E., To Shen, and Kanonidi, K.Kh., The Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015 in Nepal: Tectonic position, aftershock process, and possibilities of forecasting the evolution of seismic situation, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 534–549. doi 10.1134/S1069351316040078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schekotov, A.Y., Molchanov, O.A., Hayakawa, M., Fedorov, E.N., Chebrov, V.N., Sinitsin, V.I., Gordeev, E.E., Belyaev, G.G., and Yagova, N.V., ULF/ELF magnetic field variations from atmosphere induced by seismicity, Radio Sci., 2007, vol. 42, no. 6, RS6S90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sobisevich, A.L., Izbrannye zadachi matematicheskoi geofiziki, vulkanologii i geoekologii (Selected Problems of Mathematical Geophysics, Volcanology, and Geoecology), Moscow: IFZ RAN, 2012, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sobisevich, A.L., Sobisevich, L.E., Kanonidi, K.K., and Likhodeev, D.V., Gravimagnetic perturbations preceding earthquakes, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2017, vol. 475, no. 2, pp. 891–894. doi 10.1134/S1028334X17080086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vallée, M., Ampuero, J.P., Juhel, K., Bernard, P., Montagner, J.-P., and Barsuglia, M., Observations and modeling of the elastogravity signals preceding direct seismic waves, Science, 2017, vol. 358, no. 6367, pp. 1164–1168. doi 10.1126/science.aao0746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wells, D.L. and Coppersmith, K.J., New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1994, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 974–1002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Rogozhin
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. L. Sobisevich
    • 1
  • L. E. Sobisevich
    • 1
  • K. Kh. Kanonidi
    • 2
  1. 1.Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, TroitskRussia

Personalised recommendations