Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 224–232 | Cite as

Study of long-term variability of Black Sea dynamics on the basis of circulation model assimilation of remote measurements

  • V. L. Dorofeev
  • L. I. Sukhikh


The Black Sea dynamics for two decades (1993–2012) is analyzed. The study is carried out in numerical simulation with the use of a circulation model and assimilation of satellite measurements of free surface elevations and sea-surface temperatures (SSTs). The Black Sea circulation model has a spatial resolution of 4.8 km and 35 vertical levels, which thicken toward the surface. Arrays of ERA-Interim data are used for simulating the atmospheric forcing. A set of 3D arrays of the Black Sea hydrophysical fields is calculated on a regular grid with a time resolution of 24 h. The results are analyzed and compared with available contact measurements of temperature and salinity. This comparison shows a quite good quality of the resulted hydrophysical fields of the Black Sea.


reanalysis Black Sea dynamics numerical simulation measurement data assimilation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. V. Knysh, A. I. Kubryakov, V. A. Moiseenko, V. N. Belokopytov, N. V. Inyushina, and G. K. Korotaev, “Trends in the variability of thermohaline and dynamical characteristics of the Black Sea retrieved from 1985–1994 reanalysis,” in Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Zones and Integrated Exploitation of the Shelf Resources (EKOSI-Gidrofizika, Sevastopol’, 2008), No. 16, pp. 279–290.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. V. Knysh, G. K. Korotaev, V. A. Moiseenko, A. I. Kubryakov, and V. N. Belokopytov, “Seasonal and interannual variability of Black Sea hydrophysical fields reconstructed from 1971–1993 reanalysis data,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 47 (3) 399–411 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. V. Knysh, G. K. Korotaev, A. I. Mizyuk, and A. S. Sarkisyan, “Assimilation of hydrological observation data for calculating currents in seas and oceans,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 48 (1), 57–73 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. G. Demyshev and G. K. Korotaev, “Numerical energy-balanced model of baroclinic currents of an ocean with a C-grid rough bottom,” in Numerical Models and Results of Calibrating Calculations in the Atlantic Ocean (IVM RAN, Moscow, 1992), pp. 163–231 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. B. Zalesny, A. V. Gusev, and S. N. Moshonkin, “Numerical hydrodynamic model of the Black and Azov seas with variational initialization of temperature and salinity,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 49 (6), 642–658 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Oguz and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, “Seasonal variability of wind and thermohaline driven circulation in the Black Sea: Modeling studies,” J. Geophys. Res. 101, 16551–16569 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. V. Staneva, D. Dietrich, E. V. Stanev, and M. Bowman, “Rim current and coastal eddy mechanisms in an eddy-resolving Black Sea general circulation model,” J. Mar. Syst. 3, 137–157 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. I. Marchuk, B. E. Paton, G. K. Korotaev, and V. B. Zalesny, “Data-computing technologies: A new stage in the development of operational oceanography,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 49 (6), 579–591 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. Diansky, V. V. Fomin, N. V. Zhokhova, and A. V. Korshenko, “Computation of currents and pollution transport in coastal waters of Greater Sochi on the basis of numerical modeling,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 49 (6), 611–621 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. I. Agoshkov, M. V. Assovskii, V. B. Zalesny, N. B. Zakharova, E. I. Parmuzin, V. P. Shutyaev, “Variational assimilation of observation data in the mathematical model of the Black Sea taking in to account the tides generating forces,” Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modell. 30 (3), 129–142 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. K. Korotaev, T. Oguz, V. L. Dorofeev, S. G. Demyshev, A. I. Kubryakov, and Yu. B. Ratner, “Development of Black Sea nowcasting and forecasting system,” Ocean Sci. 7 (5), 629–649 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, et al., “The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137 (656), 553–597 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. L. Dorofeev and G. K. Korotaev, “Assimilation of satellite altimetry data into the eddy-resolving model of the Black Sea circulation,” Mors. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 1, 52–68 (2004).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. L. Dorofeev, “Assimilation of satellite measurement data on the Black Sea surface temperature in the circulation model,” in Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Zones and Integrated Exploitation of the Shelf Resources (EKOSI-Gidrofizika, Sevastopol’, 2004), No. 11, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. B. Titov, “Effect of multiannual variability of climatic conditions on the hydrological structure and interannual renewal of the cold intermediate layer in the Black Sea,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 43 (2), 164–172 (2003).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Oguz, S. Tugrul, A. E. Kideys, V. Ediger, and N. Kubilay, “Physical and biogeochemical characteristics of the Black Sea,” in The Sea, Ed. by A. R. Robinson and K. H. Brink (Harvard University, Cambridge, 2004), Vol. 14, pp. 1331–1369.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Hydrophysical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSevastopolRussia

Personalised recommendations