Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 49, Issue 8, pp 839–852 | Cite as

Using psychophysiological indices to estimate the effect of cosmophysical factors (Review)

Article

Abstract

This review first summarizes estimates of the functional response of the central nervous system (CNS) to variations in cosmophysical factors using different psychophysiological indices (electrical activity of the brain, sensorimotor and motor reactions, and higher mental functions such as attention and memory). We analyze the applicability of information technologies to record different physiological parameters.

Keywords

cosmophysical factors geomagnetic activity central nervous system psychophysiological indices electrical activity of the brain sensorimotor reactions attention memory information technologies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agadzhanyan, N.A. and Makarova, I.I., Influence of magnetic fields on differently structured biological objects. http://rezonatortver.narod.ru.
  2. Agapova, O.B., Kormalyga, V.I., Madzhitov, R.U., and Sedakova, L.M., Influence of oscillations in the cosmophysical background on the performance of middle schoolchildren, Zh. Prob. Evol. Otkr. Sist., 2004, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 143–147. Cited by Kovaleva, A.V., Influence of electromagnetic fields and radiation on biological objects, Aktual. Pitannya Biol., Ekol. Khim., 2009, no. 1, pp. 64–85.Google Scholar
  3. Anan’ev, B.G., Psikhologiya chuvstvennogo poznaniya (Psychology of Perception), Moscow: APN RSFSR, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. Anastazi, A., Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie (Psychological Testing), Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982, vol. 2, pp. 114–119.Google Scholar
  5. Arkhangel’skaya, E.V., Grabovskaya, E.Yu., and Konoval’chuk, V.N., A study of the influence of natural heliomagnetic fluctuations on human brain bioelectric activity, Uch. Zap. Tavrich. Nats. Univ. im. V. I. Vernadskogo, Ser. Biol., Khim., vol. 19, no. 58, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
  6. Belisheva, N.K., Kachanova, T.L., Nemtsov, V.I., Fomin, B.F., and Lebedeva, V.V., Global modulation of the human psychoemotional state by geospace agents, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Congress “Weak and Ultraweak Fields and Radiations in Biology and Medicine”, St. Petersburg, July 3–7, 2000, St. Petersburg, 2000, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
  7. Belisheva, N.K., Kachanova, T.L., and Konradov, A.A., Assessing the role of geospatial agents for the state of human body subject to investigation methods and data integrity, Proc. of the Int. Crimean Workshop “Space and Biosphere. Physical Fields in Biology, Medicine, Ecology”, Partenit, Crimea, Ukraine, October 1–6, 2001, Kiev, 2001, pp. 134–135.Google Scholar
  8. Belov, D.R., Kanunnikov, I.E., and Kavshbaya, N.A., Influence of sex on spatial synchronization of EEG, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 1997, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
  9. Belov, D.R., Kanunikov, I.E., and Kiselev, B.V., Dependence of spatial synchronization of human EEG on geomagnetic activity on the test day, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 1998, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 761–774.Google Scholar
  10. Belov, D.R., Kanunikov, I.E., and Kiselev, B.V., Dependence of spatial synchronization of human EEG on geomagnetic and solar activity, Elektromagnitnye polya. Biologicheskoe deistvie i gigienicheskoe normirovanie (Electromagnetic Fields. Biological Action and Hygienic Rating), Geneva, 1999, pp. 229–236.Google Scholar
  11. Belov, D.R., Getmanenko, O.V., and Kiselev, B.V., Twophase response of human nervous system to geomagnetic storms by EEG data, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 2001, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 296–314.Google Scholar
  12. Bobko, N.A. and Vasilik, P.V., Influence of heliogeophysical factors on psychophysical indicators of an operator under continuous flow manufacturing: The role of functional state. http://www.cosmos.ru/puschino/ppt/bobko.doc.
  13. Botoeva, N.K. and Gonobobleva, T.N., Assessment of the geomagnetic effect on spatial and temporal perception in healthy persons, Sovrem. Probl. Nauki Obr., 2009, no. 6, p. 11.Google Scholar
  14. Cherry, N.J., Human intelligence: the brain, an electromagnetic system synchronised by the schumann resonance signal, Med. Hypotheses, 2003, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 843–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chizhevskii, A.L., Zemnoe ekho solnechnykh bur’ (The Terrestrial Echo of Solar Storms), Moscow: Mysl’, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Chizhevskii, A.L., Kosmicheskii pul’s zhizni: Zemlya v ob”yat’yakh Solntsa. Geliotaraksiya (Space Pulse of Life: The Earth in the Embrace of the Sun. Heliotaraxy), Moscow: Mysl’, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Chuprikov, A.P., Gurova, E.V., Vlasova, N.Yu., and Krasnova, N.N., The distribution of handedness and some lateral anthropological signs among a practically healthy people of Moscow, Asimmetriya, 2010, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
  18. Dobrokhotova, T.A., Fedoruk, A.G., and Bragina, I.N., Functional asymmetry in human activities, in Interaction between Brain Hemispheres: Proceedings of the All-Union Conference, Tbilisi, 1982, p. 122.Google Scholar
  19. Doronin, V.N., Parfent’ev, V.A., Tleulin, S.Zh., Namvar, R.A., Somsikov, V.M., Drobzhev, V.I., and Cheremis, A.V., Influence of variations in geomagnetic field and solar activity on human physiological parameters, Biophys., 1998, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 610–617.Google Scholar
  20. Dyuk, V.A., Komp’yuternaya psikhodiagnostika (Computer Psychodiagnostics), St. Petersburg: Bratstvo, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. Eidelberg, P.M., Galaburda, A.M., and Geschwind, N., Cerebral asymmetries: Implications for the lateralization of language function, handedness and vision, J. Neuroophtalmol., 1982, vol. 2, p. 108.Google Scholar
  22. Fainzil’berg, L.S., Informatsionnye tekhnologii obrabotki signalov slozhnoi formy: Teoriya i praktika (Information Technologies for Complex Signal Processing: Theory and Practice), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Gaida, V.K. and Zakharov, V.P., Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie: Ucheb. posobie (Psychological Testing: A Manual), Leningrad: LGU, 1982, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
  24. Grigal, P.P. and Khorseva, N.I., RF Patent 2314743, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. Grigor’ev, P.E. and Khorseva, N.I., On possible correlation of the configuration of the interplanetary magnetic field and type of human nervous system at his/her birth time, Proceedings of the International Crimean Seminar “Space Ecology and the Noosphere”, October 4–9, 1999, Partenit, Crimea, Ukraine, Kiev, 1999, p. 33.Google Scholar
  26. Grigor’ev, P.E. and Khorseva, N.I., Geomagnetic activity and human embryonic development, Byophys., 2001, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 885–888.Google Scholar
  27. Grigor’ev, P.E. and Khorseva, N.I., On the influence of geomagnetic activity during embryogenesis on the development of non-psychotic psychic disorders, Arkhiv Psikhiatrii, 2002, no. 3, pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
  28. Grigor’ev, P.E., Poskotinova, L.V., and Tsandekov, P.A., Dynamics of system responses of the human organism on cosmophysichal factors, Tavrich. Med.-Biol. Vestn., 2008, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 124–134.Google Scholar
  29. Grigor’ev, P.E., Poskotinova, L.V., and Tsandekov, P.A., Dependence of auditory-motor reaction of healthy humans on geomagnetic activity, Fiziol. Zh., 2009, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 128–132.Google Scholar
  30. Grigor’ev, P.E., Khorseva, N.I., Grigal, P.P., Sergachev, I.A., Podznoeva, Z.L., and Khramov, V.V., Development of informational technology for studying the dependence of human functional state on cosmophysical factors, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2010a, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
  31. Grigor’ev, P.E., Khorseva, N.I., and Kozak, L.M., Biotechnical system for diagnostics of the human state and its relationship with cosmophysical factors, Kibern. Vychisl. Tekh., 2010b, no. 161, pp. 68–80.Google Scholar
  32. Grigor’ev P.E., Information technology of human state monitoring for assessing its dependence on cosmophysical factors, Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Kiev-Simferopol’, 2010c.Google Scholar
  33. Grigor’ev, P.E. and Khorseva, N.I., An information system for studying the effect of space weather on the human organism, Vestn. Alma-Atinsk. Univ. Energ. Svyazi, 2010d, no. 4, pp. 74–79 (Proceedings of the 7th Jubilee International Scientific Technical Conference “Energetics, Telecommunication, and Higher Education in Modern Conditions”, September 23–25, 2010, Almaty: Kazakhstan).Google Scholar
  34. Grigor’ev, P.E., Kilessa, G.V., Khorseva, N.I., and Ovsyannikova, N.M., Software for complex monitoring and express testing of the human psychophysiological state, Kibern. Vychisl. Tekh., 2012, no. 167, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
  35. Gurova, E.V., Nekotorye osobennosti asimmetrii analizatornykh sistem golovnogo mozga cheloveka (Some Specific Features of the Asymmetry of Analyzer Systems of Human Brain), Moscow, 1976.Google Scholar
  36. Kaibyshev, M.S., On the significance of heliobiological forecast in the practice of civil aviation, in Solntse, elektrichestvo, zhizn’ (The Sun, Electricity, and Life), Moscow, 1972, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  37. Kaibyshev, M.S., Influence of variations in the geomagnetic field on the flight personnel performance capabilities, in Problems in Medical and Biological Investigations: Proceedings of the Conference of Young Scientists of the Medical and Biological Faculty, Moscow, 1974, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
  38. Kaibyshev, M.S., Measuring flight personnel performance capabilities in geomagnetic perturbations, in Solntse, elektrichestvo i zhizn’ (The Sun, Electricity, and Life), Moscow, 1976, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
  39. Kanunikov, I.E., Belov, D.R., and Getmanenko, O.V., Influence of geomagnetic activity on human EEG, Ekol. Chel., 2010, no. 6, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  40. Kanunikov, I.E., Kiselev, B.V., Kiselev, V.B., and Shamaeva, T.F., Influence of geomagnetic activity on the recurrent dynamics of human EEG, in Vopr. geofiziki. Vyp. 44 (Problems in Geophysics. Issue 44), St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 172–178.Google Scholar
  41. Karelin, A.A., Bol’shaya entsiklopediya psikhologicheskikh testov (Big Encyclopedia of Psychological Tests), Moscow: Eksmo, 2007.Google Scholar
  42. Kaznacheev, V.P., Sovremennye aspekty adaptatsii (Modern Aspects of Adaptations), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  43. Kaznacheev, V.P., Deryapa, N.R., Khasnulin, V.I., and Trofimov, A.V., On the phenomenon of heliogeophysical imprinting and its importance in the formation of human reaction adaptation types, Byull. Sib. Otd. AMP SSSR, 1985a, no. 5, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
  44. Kaznacheev, V.P. and Mikhailova, L.P., Bioinformatsionnaya funktsiya estestvennykh elektromagnitnykh polei (The Bioinformation Function of Natural Electromagnetic Fields), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1985b.Google Scholar
  45. Khasnulin, V.I., Brian asymmetry and human ecology, Report to special committee 53.04 “General Pathology and Human Ecology” of the scientific council no. 53 on medical problems in Siberia, Far East, and Extreme North on October 16, 2003. http://hasnulin.pp.ru/node/30.
  46. Kholodov, Yu.A. and Shishlo, M.A., Elektromagnitnoe pole v neirofiziologii (Electromagnetic Fields in Meurophysiology), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.Google Scholar
  47. Kholodov, Yu.A., Mozg v elektromagnitnykh polyakh (The Brain in Electromagnetic Fields), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.Google Scholar
  48. Kholodov, Yu.A. and Lebedeva, N.N., Reaktsii nervnoi sistemy cheloveka na elektromagnitnye polya (Reactions of Human Nervous System on Electromagnetic Fields), Moscow, 1992.Google Scholar
  49. Khomskaya, E.D., Efimova, I.V., and Sirotkina, E.B., Inter-hemispheric asymmetry and arbitrary regulation of intellectual activity (towards the problem of psychodiagnostics), Vopr. Psikhol., 1988, no. 2, pp. 147–151.Google Scholar
  50. Khomskaya, E.D., Efimova, I.V., Budyka, E.V., and Enikolopova, E.V., Neiropsikhologiya individual’nykh razlichii (Neuropsychology of Individual Differences), Moscow: Rospedagentstvo, 1997.Google Scholar
  51. Khorseva N.I., Ecological value of natural electromagnetic fields during the inner-embryonic human development, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2004.Google Scholar
  52. Khorseva, N.I. and Grigor’ev, P.E., The possible role of heliogeophysical factors in the evolution of the system of post-natal encephalopathy symptoms, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2005a, vol. 4, no. 1/2, pp. 98–100.Google Scholar
  53. Khorseva, N.I. and Zenchenko, T.A., Comparison of individual typological peculiarities in men born in distinct years of the 21st-23rd cycles of solar activity, in Proceedings of the Crimean Conference “Space and Biosphere”, Partenit, Crimea, Ukraine, September 26–October, 2005), Kiev, 2005b, p. 76.Google Scholar
  54. Khorseva, N.I., Zenchenko, T.A., and Grigal, P.P., Preliminary estimates for the sensitivity of psychophysiological indicators to geomagnetic activity, in Proc. of the VII International Crimean Conference “Space and Biosphere”, Sudak, Crimea, Ukraine, October 1–6, 2007, Kiev: Mavis, 2007, p. 80.Google Scholar
  55. Khorseva, N.I. and Grigor’ev, P.E., Influence of cosmophysical factors on early ontogenesis processes, in Kosmos i zhizn. Edinstvo i mnogoobrazie (Space and Life. Unity and Diversity), Grigor’ev, P.E. and Suleimenov, I.E., Eds., Simferopol’, 2010a, pp. 32–47.Google Scholar
  56. Khorseva, N.I. and Grigor’ev, P.E., Metodical approaches to processing of individual data on computerized monitoring of the human functional state. Part 1. The use of the psycho-emotional state, Tavrich. Med.-Biol. Vestn., 2010b, vol. 13, no. 3, 242–247.Google Scholar
  57. Kimura, D., Sex differences in brain organization, Sci. Am., 1992, no. 11/12, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
  58. Kolyshkin V.V., Peculiar psychophysiological adaptation mechanisms depending on human lateral phenotype, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Tomsk, 1997.Google Scholar
  59. Loskutova, T.D., Assessment of the functional state of human central nervous system on the basis of simple motor response parameters, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I.M. Sechenova, 1975, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  60. Lyskov, E.B., Medvedev, S.V., Aleksanyan, Z.A., Chernyshev, M.V., Dudko, M.M., and Mikhailov, V.O., Neurophysiological approaches to the study of human sensitivity to the action of weak electromagnetic fields, in Slabye i sverkhslabye polya i izlucheniya v biologii i meditsine (Weak and Superweak Fields and Radiations in Biology and Medicine), St. Petersburg, 1997, p. 182.Google Scholar
  61. Lyubarskii, A.V., Grigor’ev, P.E. and Khorseva, N.I., On the influence of geomagnetic activity during embryogenesis on the development of non-psychotic psychic disorders, Arkhiv Psikhiatrii, 2002, no. 3, pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
  62. Maksimov, A.L., Volkov, A.I., Savintseva, A.A., Shabanov, G.A., Lebedev, Yu.A., and Rybchenko, A.A., On the resonance interaction of Schuman biospheric frequencies and rhythms of human brain, Nauch. tr. VI Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa “Slabye i sverkhslabye polya i izlucheniya v biologii i meditsine”, g. Sankt-Peterburg, 02–06 iyulya 2012 g (Proceedings of the VI International Congress “Weak and Superweak Fields and Radiations in Biology and Medicine”, St. Petersburg, July 2–6, 2012), St. Petersburg, 2012, p. 168.Google Scholar
  63. Moiseeva, N.I., The structure of biorhythms as a criterion of capabilities of physiological adaptation of the organism, in Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 1978, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1632–1640.Google Scholar
  64. Moiseeva, N.I. and Sysuev, V.M., Vremennaya sreda i biologicheskie ritmy (The Temporal environment and Biological Rhythms), Leningrad: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
  65. Moskvin V.A., The problem of the link of the lateral profiles with individual human differences, Doctoral (Psychol.) Dissertation, Ufa, 2002.Google Scholar
  66. Mulligan, B.P. and Persinger, M.A., Experimental simulation of the effects of sudden increases in geomagnetic activity upon quantitative measures of human brain activity: validation of correlational studies, Neurosci. Lett., 2012, vol. 516, no. 1, pp. 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika (General Psychodiagnostics), Bodalev, A.A. and Stolin, V.V., Eds., Moscow: MGU, 1988, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  68. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike: differentsial’naya psikhometrika (Practical Course of Psychodiagnostics: Differential Psychometrics), Stolin, V.V. and Shmelev, A.G., Eds., Moscow: MGU, 1984, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  69. Presman, A.S., Elektromagnitnye polya i zhivaya priroda (Electromagnetic Fields and Living Nature), Moscow: Nauka, 1968.Google Scholar
  70. Pyatkov, A.V., Correlation analysis of meteolability of cerebral homeostasis in practically healthy young men in North Europe, in Proceedings of the Regional Symposium “Adaptation to Extreme Geophysical Factors and Preventive Measures for Meteotropic Reaction”, Novosibirsk, November 1–3, 1989, Novosibirsk, 1989, pp. 37–40.Google Scholar
  71. Raevskaya, O.S. and Ryzhikov, G.V., Variations in the geomagnetic field and dynamics of inter-hemispheric asymmetry, Fiziol. Chel., 1984, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 471–474.Google Scholar
  72. Raevskaya, O.S., Geomagnetic field and human organism (a review), Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 1988, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
  73. Rusalov, V.M., Biologicheskie osnovy individual’no-psikhologicheskikh razlichii (Biological Bases of Individual and Psychological Differences), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.Google Scholar
  74. Ryzhikov, G.V. and Raevskaya, O.S., Influence of geomagnetic field on some indicators of psychic activity, Psikhol. Zh., 1982, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
  75. Sivitskii, V.G., Psikhodiagnostika (Psychodiagnostics), Minsk: Vedy, 2003.Google Scholar
  76. Shabanov, G.A., Maksimov, A.L., and Rybchenko, A.A., Funktsional’no-topicheskaya diagnostika organizma cheloveka na osnove analiza ritmicheskoi aktivnosti golovnogo mozga (Functional and Topical Diagnostics of Human Organism Based on Analysis of Brain Rhythmic Activity), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2011.Google Scholar
  77. Svancara, J., Diagnostika psychick’eho v’yvoje (Diagnostics of Psychic Development), Praha: Avicenum, 1978, p. 46.Google Scholar
  78. Sidyakin, V.G., Temur’yants, N.A., Stashkov, A.M., and Makeev, V.B., On the nervous system sensitivity to changes in solar activity (a review), Zh. Nevropatol. Psikhiatr. im. S.S. Korsakova, 1983, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 134–137.Google Scholar
  79. Sidyakin, V.G., Yanova, N.P., Sukhinin, A.V., Arkhangel’skaya, E.V., Kirillova, A.V., Shinkarevskii, P.V., and Kulichenko, A.M., Correlation relationships between human EEG and heliogeomagnetic activity parameters, in Proc. of the Int. Crimean Workshop “Space and Biosphere”, Partenit, Crimea, Ukraine, October 1–6, 2001, Kiev, 2001, pp. 146–147.Google Scholar
  80. Suchkina, E.G., Influence of meteorological factors on human psychophysiological responses, Fiziol. Chel., 1985, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 470–473.Google Scholar
  81. Tambiev, A.E., Medvedev, S.D., and Egorova, E.V., Influence of geomagnetic perturbations on the functions of attention and memory, Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med., 1995, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 43–45.Google Scholar
  82. Usenko, G.A., Functional and reserve capabilities of the organism of highand low-anxious pilots in West Siberia and their relation with the dynamics of solar activity, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Tomsk, 1995.Google Scholar
  83. Vasilik, P.V., System analysis of the influence of the Earth’s magnetic field on human growth and development, Kibernet. Vychisl. Tekh., 1979, no. 45, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
  84. Verko, N.P. and Grigor’ev, P.E., Specific features of the relation of time perception with cosmophysical and meteorological factors depending on emotional characteristics of test subjects, in Proc. of the VIII International Interdisciplinary Congress “Neuroscience for Medicine and Psychology”, Sudak, Crimea, Ukraine, June 2–12, 2012, Sudak, 2012, p. 111.Google Scholar
  85. Vlasov, Yu.V. and Bilyashevich, T.V., Influence of electromagnetic fields on human organism, in Safety of Life Support: Education, Ecology, Work Safety, Fire and Industrial Safety in Emergency Situations, Proc. of the XI Int. Scientific Readings in the International Academy of Environmental, Human and Natural Security Sciences and the International Scientific and Methodical Conference on Life Security, Novocherkassk, May 24–26, 2007, Novocherkassk: YuRGTU (NPI), 2007, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  86. Zenchenko, T.A., Tsandekov, P.A., Grigor’ev, P.E., Merzlyi, A.M., Zenchenko, K.I., Khorseva, N.I., and Grigal, P.P., Issledovanie kharaktera svyazei fiziologicheskikh i psikhofiziologicheskikh pokazatelei chelovecheskogo organizma s meteorologicheskimi i geomagnitnymi faktorami, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2008, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
  87. Zenchenko, T.A., Khorseva, N.I., Grigal, P.P., Merzlyi, A.M., Tsandekov, P.A., Grigor’ev, P.E., Podznoeva, Z., Breus, T.K., Stoilova, I., Dimitrova, S., and Dzhordanova, M., A method of monitoring of human psychophysiological indicators for determining the rate of individual sensitivity to external factors, Tr. Bolgar. Akad. Nauk, 2009, pp. 166–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emanuel Institute of Biochemical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Space Research InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations