Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 622–631 | Cite as

Study of long-term variations in the Black Sea fields using an interdisciplinary physical and biogeochemical model

  • V. L. DorofeevEmail author
  • G. K. Korotaev
  • L. I. Sukhikh


Using an interdisciplinary three-dimensional physical and biogeochemical model developed for the Black Sea, the long-term evolution of marine dynamics and ecosystem is investigated. The hydrophysical fields were calculated from a model of Black Sea circulation with assimilation of hydrographic survey and satellite measurement data from 1971 to 2001. The circulation model reproduces well processes of various scales in both space and time (particularly the seasonal course and interannual variability of main hydrophysical fields). The resulting flow fields are then used to calculate the long-term evolution of the components of the lower level of the food chain in the Black Sea ecosystem. The biogeochemical model used in the calculations is based on the nitrogen cycle and includes a parameterization of the main biological and chemical interactions and processes in the upper layer of the Black Sea. The numerical experiments indicated that the biogeochemical component of the model rather successfully reproduces the main features and evolution trends in the Black Sea ecosystem for the period under consideration: the growth in the phytoplankton biomass during eutrophication and changes in seasonal cycles of the main ecosystem components. Also, the hydrophysical processes were shown to be important for a reliable reproduction of long-term changes in the ecosystem.


numerical simulation the Black Sea ecosystem 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. K. Konovalov and J. W. Murray, “Variations in the chemistry of the Black Sea on a time scale of decades (1960–1995),” J. Mar. Syst. 31, 217–243 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. V. Knysh, G. K. Korotaev, V. A. Moiseenko, A. I. Kubryakov, V. N. Belokopytov, and N. V. Inyushina, “Seasonal and interannual variability of Black Sea hydrophysical fields reconstructed from 1971–1993 reanalysis data,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 47(3), 399–411 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. V. Knysh, A. I. Kubryakov, N. V. Inyushina, G. K. Korotaev, and V. A. Moiseenko, “Reconstruction of the climatic seasonal circulation of Black Sea using a σ-coordinate model with assimilated temperature and salinity data,” in Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Areas and Integrated Use of Shelf Resouces (MGI NAS of Ukraine, Sevastopol, 2008), Vol. 16, pp. 243–265 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Oguz, H. W. Ducklow, and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, “Modeling distinct vertical biochemical structure of the Black Sea: Dynamical coupling of the oxic, suboxic, and anoxic layers,” Global Biochem. Cycles 14(4), 1331–1352 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Oguz, H. W. Ducklow, J. E. Purcell, and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, “Modeling the response of top-down control exerted by gelatinous carnivores on the Black Sea pelagic food web,” J. Geophys. Res. 106(C3), 4543–4564 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Oguz, B. Salihoglu, and B. Fach, “A coupled plankton-anchovy population dynamics model assessing nonlinear controls of anchovy and gelatinous biomass in the Black Sea,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 369, 229–256 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Lancelot, J. Staneva, D. Van Eeckhout, J. Beckers, E. Stanev, “Modelling the Danube-influenced northwestern continental shelf of the Black Sea. II: Ecosystem response to changes in nutrient delivery by Danube river after its damming in (1972),” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 54, 473–499 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Grergoire, C. Raick and K. Soetaert, “Numerical modeling of the central Black Sea ecosystem functioning during the eutrophication phase,” Prog. Oceanogr. 76, 286–333 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Grergoire and G. Lacroix, “Exchange processes and nitrogen cycling on the shelf and continental slope of the Black Sea basin,” Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 4201–4217 (2003).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Grergoire and Friedrich, J., “Nitrogen budget of the north-western Black Sea shelf as inferred from modeling studies and in-situ benthic measurements,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 270, 15–39 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Grergoire, N. Nezlin, A. Kostianoy, and K. Soetaert, “Modeling the nitrogen cycling and plankton productivity in an enclosed environment (the Black Sea) using a three-dimensional coupled Hydrodynamicalecosystem model. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C05007 (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Oguz, V. L. Dorofeev, and G. K. Korotaev, “Modeling of the Black Sea ecosystem,” Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 1, 59–72 (2007).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. L. Dorofeev, “Modeling the Decadal Variability of the Black Sea ecosystem,” Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 6, 49–61 (2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Ludwig, “Water and nutrient fluxes from major Mediterranean and Black Sea rivers: Past and future trends and their implications for the basin-scale budgets,” Global Biogeochem. Cycles 24, 1–14 (2010).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. N. Eremeev and S. K. Konovalov, “On the budget formation and regularities in the distribution of oxygen and hydrogen sulfide in the Black Sea,” Morsk. Ekol. Zh. 5(3), 5–29 (2006).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Knysh, G. K. Korotaev, V. A. Moiseenko, et al., “Seasonal and interannual variability of Black Sea hydrophysical fields reconstructed from 1971–1993 reanalysis data,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 47(3) 399–411 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. L. Dorofeev and G. K. Korotaev, “Assimilation of satellite altimetry data into the eddy-resolving model of the Black Sea circulation,” Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 1, 52–68 (2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. E. Purcell, T. A. Shiganova, M. B. Decker, et al., “The ctenophore mnemiopsis in native and exotic habitats: U.S. estuaries versus the Black Sea basin,” Hydrobiologia, 451 145–176 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Oguz and D. Gilbert, “Abrupt transitions of the topdown controlled Black Sea pelagic ecosystem during 1960–2000: Evidence for regime-shifts under strong fishery exploitation and nutrient enrichment modulated by climate-induced variations,” Deep-Sea Res. 54(2), 220–242 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Oguz, S. Tugrul, A. E. Kideys, V. Ediger, and N. Kubilay, “Physical and biogeochemical characteristic of the Black sea,” in The Sea, Vol. 14, Ed. by A. R. Robinson and K. H. Brink, (President and Fellows of Harvard College, Harvard, 2004). pp. 1331–1369.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. V. Suslin, T. Ya. Churilova, and Kh. M. Sosik, “Regional algorithm for the chlorophyll concentration in the Black Sea by SaeWiFS satellite data,” Morsk. Ekol. Zh., No. 2, 24–42 (2008).Google Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. L. Dorofeev
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. K. Korotaev
    • 1
  • L. I. Sukhikh
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Hydrophysical InstituteNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineSevastopolUkraine

Personalised recommendations