Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 586–597

Possible causes of the underestimation of paleoclimate low-frequency variability by statistical methods

  • E. V. Dmitriev
  • A. I. Chavro
Article

Abstract

The Northern Hemisphere mean surface temperature has shown a significant positive trend over the past two centuries. On the basis of the well-known reconstructions of global climate from proxy data, the conclusion is made that the current warming has been unprecedented during at least the past two millennia. On the other hand, it was demonstrated in [6] that the existing statistical models strongly underestimate the low-frequency variability of global annual mean temperature, thus making the conclusion drawn above questionable. At present, the results of [6] are interpreted as evidence that the Mann reconstruction is invalid [1]. To our knowledge, however, it is too early to draw such conclusions. What is the cause of smoothing low-frequency variability? To what extent are various statistical models used for paleoclimate reconstruction that is subject to this effect? To answer these questions, numerical experiments are performed with data sets of annual mean surface temperature over the past millennium that are simulated with the ECHO-G coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. E. Mann, R. S. Bradley, and M. K. Hughest, “Global-Scale Temperature Patterns and Climate Forcing over the Past Six Centuries,” Nature 392, 779–787 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. E. Mann, R. S. Bradley, and M. K. Hughest, “Northern Hemisphere Temperatures During the Past Millennium: Inferences, Uncertainties, and Limitations,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 759–762 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. D. Jones, K. R. Briffa, T. P. Barnett, and S. Tett, “High-Resolution Paleoclimatic Records for the Last Millennium: Interpretation, Integration and Comparison with General Circulation Model Control Run Temperatures,” The Holocene 8, 455–471 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. R. Briffa, “Annual Climate Variability in the Holocene: Interpreting the Message of Ancient Trees,” Quatern. Sci. Rev. 19, 87–105 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. McKitrick and S. McIntyre, “Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series,” Energy Environ. 14, 751–771 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Storch, E. Zorita, J. Jones, et al., “Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data,” Science 306, 679–682 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Zorita, F. Gonzalez-Rouco, and S. Legutke, “Testing the Mann et al. (1998) Approach to Paleoclimate Reconstructions in the Context of a 1000-yr Control Simulation with the ECHO-G Coupled Climate Model,” J. Clim. 16, 1378–1390 (2003).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. D. Jones and M. E. Mann, “Climate over Past Millennia,” Rev. Geophys. 42, doi:10.1029/2003RG000143 (2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. I. Chavro and V. P. Dymnikov, Methods of Mathematical Statistics in Atmospheric Physics (IVM RAN, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. M. Oboukhov, “On Statistical Orthogonal Expansions of Empirical Functions,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geofiz., No. 3, 432–439 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. V. Dmitriev, “Analysis of Methods for Processing Proxi Measurements of Geophysical Quantities and Estimating Errors in Their Interpretation,” Inform.-Izmerit. Upravl. Sist. 2(5), 12–22 (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. P. Pyt’ev and A. I. Chulichkov, “Recurrent Techniques of Measurement Reduction,” Mat. Model. 1(8), 22–44 (1989).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. I. Chavro and E. V. Dmitriev, “Statistical Model for Reconstruction of the Regional Structure of Geophysical Fields,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 6, 39–49 (2002).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. E. Mann and S. Rutherford, “Climate Reconstruction Using ‘Pseudoproxies’,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1391–1394 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. G. Dobrovol’skii, Climatic Changes in the Hydrosphere-Atmosphere System (Geos, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Moberg, D. M. Sonechkin, K. Holmgren, et al., “Highly Variable Northern Hemisphere Temperatures Reconstructed from Low-and High-Resolution Proxy Data,” Nature 433, 613–617 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Dmitriev
    • 1
  • A. I. Chavro
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Numerical MathematicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations