Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 325–331 | Cite as

Negative Ca and Ba ions of large radius on the surface and in the volume of liquid helium

  • P. D. Grigor’ev
  • A. M. Dyugaev


Negative Ca and Ba ions of large radii on the surface of and in bulk liquid helium have been studied. Our results indicate that these ions are adsorbed on the helium surface. Ions on free liquid helium surfaces have not been studied previously because it was thought impossible to confine them on the surface. Ca and Ba ions have very low binding energies, therefore, like electrons, they form a bubble of large radius in bulk helium, whose energy is higher than on the surface. The behavior of ions on the surface exhibits a number of previously unknown features owing to their large masses and strong localization in the horizontal plane. Even in the absence of confining electric field, a hole is formed under an ion due to the polarization attraction between the liquid helium and the charged ion. This hole formation reduces the ion mobility by several orders of magnitude and increases its effective mass severalfold. The critical density of electrons and ions is approximately the same on the surfaces of thin and thick helium films.


Helium Horizontal Plane Effective Mass Liquid Helium Large Radius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. B. Shikin and Yu. P. Monarkha, Two-Dimensional Charged Systems in Helium [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Mistura, T. Gunzler, B. Bitnar et al., Surf. Sci. 361–362, 831 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Quantum Hall Effect, ed. by R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin, Springer (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. F. Volykhin, A. G. Khrapak, and V. F. Shmidt, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 108, 1642 (1995) [JETP 81, 901 (1995)].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. F. Gribakin, B. V. Gul’tsev et al., J. Phys. B 23, 4505 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. V. Petrunin, H. H. Andersen, P. Balling, and T. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 744 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. V. Petrunin, J. D. Voldstad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1911 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. B. Shikin and Yu. P. Monarkha, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 751 (1973) [Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 373 (1973)].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, FLuid Mechanics, Pergamon (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. P. Gor’kov and D. M. Chernikova, JETP Lett. 18, 68 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Institute of Physics 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Grigor’ev
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. M. Dyugaev
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.L. D. Landau Institute of Theoretical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesChernogolovka, Moscow RegionRussia
  2. 2.Grenoble High Magnetic Field Laboratory MPI-FRF and CNRS BP 166Grenoble Cedex 09France

Personalised recommendations