Advertisement

Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 68, Issue 12, pp 2129–2138 | Cite as

Measurement of the tensor analyzing power for relativistic-deuteron fragmentation as a means for studying the deuteron structure within light-front dynamics

  • L. S. Azhgirey
  • S. V. Afanasiev
  • V. N. Zhmyrov
  • L. S. Zolin
  • V. I. Ivanov
  • A. Yu. Isupov
  • V. P. Ladygin
  • A. G. Litvinenko
  • V. F. Peresedov
  • A. N. Khrenov
  • N. P. Yudin
Elementary Particles and Fields Theory
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

New data on the vector (Ay) and tensor (Ayy) analyzing powers for the reaction 9Be (d, p)X at a primary deuteron momentum of 5 GeV/c for a proton emission angle of 178 mrad are obtained by using the synchrophasotron of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR, Dubna). The experimental data on A yy are analyzed within the approach based on light-front dynamics, the relativistic wave function obtained by Karmanov and his colleagues being used for the deuteron. It is shown that, in contrast to what one has from calculations with standard nonrelativistic deuteron wave functions, all relevant data can be explained in this approximation without resort to additional degrees of freedom.

Keywords

Wave Function Elementary Particle Analyze Power Nuclear Research Joint Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Arvieux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 19 (1983); Nucl. Phys. A 431, 613 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. F. Perdrisat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2840 (1987); V. Punjabi et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 608 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Cheung et al., Phys. Lett. B 284, 210 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Punjabi et al., Phys. Lett. B 350, 178 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. G. Ableev et al., Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 558 (1988) [JETP Lett. 47, 649 (1988)]; Kratk. Soobshch. OIYaI, No. 4[43]-90, 5 (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Aono et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4997 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., Phys. Lett. B 387, 37 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. A. Nomofilov et al., Phys. Lett. B 325, 327 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Kuehn et al., Phys. Lett. B 334, 298 (1994); L. S. Azhgirey et al., Kratk. Soobshch. OIYaI, No. 3[77]-96, 23 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., Phys. Lett. B 391, 22 (1997); Yad. Fiz. 61, 494 (1998) [Phys. At. Nucl. 61, 432 (1998)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. S. Azhgirey and N. P. Yudin, Yad. Fiz. 57, 160 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 151 (1994)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. E. Carlson, J. R. Hiller, and R. J. Holt, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47, 395 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. V. Afanasiev et al., Phys. Lett. B 434, 21 (1998).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. P. Ladygin et al., Few-Body Syst. 32, 127 (2002); L. S. Azhgirey et al., Yad. Fiz. 66, 719 (2003) [Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 690 (2003)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. S. Azhgirey and N. P. Yudin, nucl-th/0212033.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. S. Azhgirey and N. P. Yudin, Yad. Fiz. 68, 163 (2005) [Phys. At. Nucl. 68, 160 (2005)]; nucl-th/0311052.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949).CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Carbonell and V. A. Karmanov, Nucl. Phys. A 581, 625 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. A. Karmanov and A. V. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. A 575, 520 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Carbonell et al., Phys. Rep. 300, 215 (1998).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., Nucl. Phys. A 528, 621 (1991); L. S. Azhgirei et al., Yad. Fiz. 46, 1134 (1987) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46, 661 (1987)]; 53, 1591 (1991) [53, 977 (1991)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., Yad. Fiz. 62, 1796 (1999) [Phys. At. Nucl. 62, 1673 (1999)].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. P. Ladygin et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 8, 409 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. G. Anishchenko et al., in Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on High Energy Spin Physics, Brookhaven, 1982; AIP Conf. Proc. 95, 445 (1983).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. S. Zolin et al., Kratk. Soobshch. OIYaI, No. 2[88]-98, 27 (1998).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., Prib. Tekh. Éksp., No. 1, 51 (1997) [Instrum. Exp. Tech., No. 1, 43 (1997)]; Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 497, 340 (2003).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. A. Schmidt and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. D 15, 3321 (1977).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ch.-Y. Wong and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. C 22, 2433 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. S. Azhgirei, S. V. Razin, and N. P. Yudin, Yad. Fiz. 46, 1657 (1987) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46, 988 (1987)].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Lacombe et al., Phys. Lett. B 101B, 139 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Gilman and F. Gross, nucl-th/0111015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Azhgirey
    • 1
  • S. V. Afanasiev
    • 1
  • V. N. Zhmyrov
    • 1
  • L. S. Zolin
    • 1
  • V. I. Ivanov
    • 1
  • A. Yu. Isupov
    • 1
  • V. P. Ladygin
    • 1
  • A. G. Litvinenko
    • 1
  • V. F. Peresedov
    • 1
  • A. N. Khrenov
    • 1
  • N. P. Yudin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsMoscow State UniversityVorob’evy gory, MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations