Advertisement

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

, Volume 95, Issue 6, pp 1062–1073 | Cite as

Interlayer interaction in a Fe/Cr/Fe system: Dependence on the thickness of the chrome interlayer and on temperature

  • S. O. Demokritov
  • A. B. Drovosekov
  • N. M. Kreines
  • H. Nembach
  • M. Rickart
  • D. I. Kholin
Solids Structure

Abstract

A three-layer sample of Fe(100 Å)/Cr(0–20 Å)/Fe(100 Å) is used to study the dependence of inter-layer exchange on the thickness of the chrome interlayer and on temperature. The method of Kerr magnetometry in the temperature range from 77 to 473 K and the method of Brillouin scattering of light by spin waves at room temperature are used. The data for magnetization curves and spin wave spectra are treated in the model of biquadratic exchange. The range of validity of this model is established, which is apparently determined by interlayer exchange. The resultant dependence of the constant of bilinear interaction on the interlayer thickness demonstrates an oscillating behavior with two oscillation periods of about 3 and 18 Å. Within the experimental error, the magnitude of this constant, the amplitude, and the period and phase of its oscillation are independent of temperature. It is found that the constant of biquadratic exchange decreases in inverse proportion to the chrome thickness, the proportionality factor decreasing linearly as the temperature rises. In order to interpret the observed singularities in the behavior of the biquadratic exchange constant, a theoretical model is suggested which includes the nonideality of the interface and the presence of magnetic hardness in the chrome interlayer. This rigidity exceeds in magnitude the interaction on the interface between iron and chrome. The suggested model gives an adequate qualitative description of the experimental results.

Keywords

Magnetization Curve Spin Wave Wave Spectrum Qualitative Description Proportionality Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. E. Wigen and Z. Zang, Braz. J. Phys. 22, 267 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Heinrich and J. Cochran, Adv. Phys. 42, 523 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Fert, P. Grünberg, A. Barthelemy, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140–144, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. O. Demokritov, J. Phys. D 31, 925 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. T. Pierce, J. Unguris, R. J. Celotta, and M. D. Stiles, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 290 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. D. Stiles, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 332 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. M. Edwards, J. Mathon, R. B. Muniz, and M. S. Phan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 493 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Bruno and C. Chappert, Phys. Rev. B 46, 261 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. B 52, 411 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. C. Slonczewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3172 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. O. Demokritov, E. Tsymbal, P. Grünberg, et al., Phys. Rev. B 49, 720 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. C. Slonczewski, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5957 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 150, 13 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Schreyer et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 16 066 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. T. Pierce, A. D. Davis, J. A. Strocio, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 222, 13 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. D. Levchenko, A. I. Morozov, A. S. Sigov, and Yu. S. Sigov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 114, 1817 (1998) [JETP 87, 985 (1998)].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Schreyer, C. F. Majkrzak, T. Zeidler, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4914 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu-Pei Shi and R. S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1351 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. N. Men’shov and V. V. Tugushev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 120, 899 (2001) [JETP 93, 786 (2001)].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. N. Men’shov and V. V. Tugushev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 122, 1044 (2002) [JETP 95, 901 (2002)].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. B. Drovosekov, N. M. Kreines, D. I. Kholin, et al., Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 690 (1998) [JETP Lett. 67, 727 (1998)].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. B. Drovosekov, O. V. Zhotikova, N. M. Kreines, et al., Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 116, 1817 (1999) [JETP 89, 986 (1999)].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Heinrich, J. F. Cochran, T. Monchesky, and R. Urban, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14 520 (1999).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Azevedo, C. Chesman, M. Lucena, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 177–181, 1177 (1998).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Chesman, N. S. Almeida, A. Azevedo, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226–230, 1770 (2001).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. From, L. X. Liao, J. F. Cochran, and B. Heinrich, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6181 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Vavassori, M. Grimsditch, and E. E. Fullerton, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 223, 284 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Dekoster, J. Meersschaut, S. Hogge, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 198–199, 303 (1999).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. B. Drovosekov, D. I. Kholin, N. M. Kreines, et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226–230, 1779 (2001).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. B. Drovosekov, D. I. Kholin, N. M. Kreines, et al., Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 91, Suppl. 1, 74 (2001).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. S. Krinchik, Physics of Magnetic Phenomena (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1976).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Blanco-Gutiérrez, M. Vélez, J. Diaz, et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 024417 (2001).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. R. Sandercock, in Light Scattering in Solids III, Ed. by M. Cardona and G. Güntherodt (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982), p. 173.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Grimsditch, S. Kumar, and E. E. Fullerton, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3385 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. M. Rezende, C. Chesman, M. A. Lucena, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 958 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Chirita, G. Robins, R. L. Stamps, et al., Phys. Rev. B 58, 869 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. Zabel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 9303 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. O. Demokritov
    • 1
  • A. B. Drovosekov
    • 2
  • N. M. Kreines
    • 2
  • H. Nembach
    • 1
  • M. Rickart
    • 1
  • D. I. Kholin
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Kapitza Institute for Physical ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations