Advertisement

Technical Physics

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 1061–1063 | Cite as

Effect of superconductivity-magnetism interaction on the differential conductivity in Ho(NiB)2C/Ag point contacts

  • I. N. Askerzade
  • B. Tanatar
Brief Communications
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In terms of the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwjik theory, the differential conductivity of Ho(NiB)2C/Ag point contacts is explained by the coexistence of magnetic ordering and superconductivity in holmium boron carbides.

Keywords

Carbide Boron Point Contact Boron Carbide Holmium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. F. Andreev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 46, 1823 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228 (1964)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. N. Artemenko, A. F. Volkov, and A. V. Zaitsev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 76, 1816 (1979) [Sov. Phys. JETP 49, 924 (1979)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. K. Yanson, in Symmetry and Pairing in Superconductors, Ed. by M. Auslos and S. Kruchinin (Academic, Kluwer, 1999), pp. 271–285.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Belogolovski, M. Grajcar, P. Kus, et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 9617 (1999).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. A. Clemm, in High Temperature Superconductivity—Ten Years after Discovery, Ed. by K. B. Garg and S. M. Bose (Narosa, New Delhi, 1998), pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Kohen and G. Deutscher, Phys. Rev. B 64, 060506 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.-L. Drechsler, S. V. Shulga, K.-H. Muller, et al., Physica C (Amsterdam) 317–318, 117 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. S. Lin, J. H. Shich, B. Yon, et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 1181 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. F. Rybaltchenko, A. G. M. Jansen, P. Wider, et al., Physica C (Amsterdam) 319, 189 (1999).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwjik, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. I. Morozov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 22, 3372 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. I. Morozov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 110, 1903 (1996) [JETP 83, 1048 (1996)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.-X. Zu, B. Freidman, and C. S. Ting, Phys. Rev. B 59, 9558 (1999).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Honercamp and M. Sigrist, J. Low Temp. Phys. 111, 895 (1998).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Goll, C. Bruder, and H. V. Lohneyesen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6801 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Amici, P. Thalmeier, and P. Fulde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1800 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Krug, H. Heinecke, and K. Winzer, Physica C (Amsterdam) 267, 321 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. N. Askerzade
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Tanatar
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsAcademy of Sciences of AzerbaijanBakuAzerbaijan
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentAnkara University, TandoganAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Physics DepartmentBilkent UniversityBilkent, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations