π-0 transition in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junctions

  • N. M. Chtchelkatchev
  • W. Belzig
  • Yu. V. Nazarov
  • C. Bruder
Condensed Matter


Superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor (SFS) Josephson junctions are known to exhibit a transition between π and 0 states. In this letter, we find the π-0 phase diagram of an SFS junction depending on the transparency of an intermediate insulating layer (I). We show that, in general, the Josephson critical current is nonzero at the π-0 transition temperature. Contributions to the current from the two spin channels nearly compensate each other, and the first harmonic of the Josephson current as a function of phase difference is suppressed. However, higher harmonics give a nonzero contribution to the supercurrent.

PACS numbers

74.50.+r 74.60.Jg 74.80.−g 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. N. Bulaevskii, V. V. Kuzii, and A. A. Sobyanin, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 25, 314 (1977) [JETP Lett. 25, 290 (1977)].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. V. Andreev, A. I. Buzdin, and R. M. Osgood, Phys. Rev. B 43, 10124 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. I. Buzdin, B. Vujicic, and M. Yu. Kupriyanov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 101, 231 (1992) [Sov. Phys. JETP 74, 124 (1992)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. V. Veretennikov, V. V. Ryazanov, V. A. Oboznov, et al., Physica B (Amsterdam) 284–288, 495 (2000); V. V. Ryazanov, V. A. Oboznov, A. Yu. Rusanov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2427 (2001); V. V. Ryazanov, V. A. Oboznov, A. V. Veretennikov, et al., cond-mat/0103240.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. V. Feigelman, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 169, 917 (1999).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. V. Ioffe, V. B. Geshkenbein, M. V. Feigelman, et al., Nature 398, 679 (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Kontos, M. Aprili, and J. Lesueur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 304 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Zareyan, W. Belzig, and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 308 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Guéron et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4148 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Fogelström, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11812 (2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. V. Kuplevakhskii and I. I. Falko, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 52, 957 (1990) [JETP Lett. 52, 340 (1990)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3836 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3140 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. K. Likharev, Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits (Nauka, Moscow, 1985; Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. M. Chtchelkatchev
    • 1
  • W. Belzig
    • 2
  • Yu. V. Nazarov
    • 3
  • C. Bruder
    • 2
  1. 1.Landau Institute for Theoretical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Departement Physik und AstronomieUniversität BaselBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Applied Physics and Delft Institute of Microelectronics and SubmicrontechnologyDelft University of TechnologyCJ DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations