Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of Varying Adhesion Levels in Chondrocytes Using the Cytodetacher

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential to promote cell adhesion must be evaluated in the development of tissue-engineered implants and scaffolds. One measure of cell adherence is the force necessary to detach the cell. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cytodetacher (Athanasiou, K. A., [et al.] Development of the cytodetachment technique to quantify cellular adhesiveness. Biomaterials 20: 2405–2415, 1999), modified to test cells grown on substrata, as a means of calculating cell adhesion forces. Live and formalin-fixed bovine and rabbit chondrocytes underwent cytodetachment to verify that the cytodetacher provides satisfactory resolution to differentiate between live and fixed cells. Fixed cells had significantly greater mechanical adhesiveness than those prepared live: the values for the fixed rabbit and bovine chondrocytes were 1.01 and 1.56 μN, respectively, versus 0.14 and 0.17 μN for the live cells (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of the cytodetacher was also gauged by detaching live rabbit chondrocytes seeded for varying amounts of time (40, 80, and 120 min). For the 40, 80, and 120 min time points the maximum detachment forces were found to be significantly different: 2.87 X 10-2},6.75 X 10-2, and 14.30 X 10-2}μN respectively. This study validates the use of the modified cytodetacher as an effective means of evaluating the strength of adhesion of cells attached to a substratum. © 2002 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC2002: 8780Rb, 8780Fe, 8718La

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Abercrombie, M., and E. Harris. Interference microscopic studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. Exp. Cell Res. 15:332–345, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Athanasiou, K. A., B. S. Thoma, D. R. Lanctot, D. Shin, C. M. Agrawal, and R. G. LeBaron. Development of the cytodetachment technique to quantify cellular adhesiveness. Biomaterials 20:2405–2415, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, G. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200:618–627, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burridge, K., and M. Chrzanowka-Wodnicka. Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:463–518, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C. S., M. Mrksich, S. Huang, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276:1425–1428, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coman, D. R. Adhesion and stickiness: Two independent properties of cell surfaces. Cancer Res. 21:1436–1438, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Culp. L. A. Biochemical determinants of cell adhesion. Current Topics in Membranes and Transport. New York: Academic, 1978, Vol. II, pp. 327–396.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duval, J., M. Letort, and M. Sigot-Luizard. Fundamental study of cell migration and adhesion toward different biomaterials with organotypic culture method. Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990, Vol. 9, pp. 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edsall, J. T. The reaction of formaldehyde with amino acids and proteins. In: Advances in Protein Chemistry, edited by J. T. Edsall and M. L. Aaj. New York: Academic, 1945, pp. 278–336.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, E. A. Energetics of red blood cell-lipid vesicle and lipid vesicle-lipid vesicle aggregation in glucose polymer (Dextran) solutions. Colloids Surf. 10:133–141, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Francis, G. W., L. R. Fisher, and R. A. Gamble. Direct measurement of cell detachment force on single cells using a new electrochemical method. J. Cell. Sci. 87:519–523, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia, A., P. Ducheyenne, and D. Boettiger. Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disk device and application to surface-reactive materials. Biomaterials 18:1091–1098, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. George, J. N., R. I. Weed, and C. F. Reed. Adhesion of human erythrocytes to glass: The nature of the interaction and the effect of serum and plasma. J. Cell Physiol. 77:51–60, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer, D., and D. Lauffenburger. A dynamical model for receptor-mediated cell adhesion to surfaces. Biophys. J. 52:475–487, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hynes, R. O., Integrins: A family of cell surface receptors. Cell 48:549–554, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. LeBaron, R. G., J. D. Esko, A. Woods, S. Johansson, and M. Hook. Adhesion of glycosaminoglycan-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants to fibronectin substrata. J. Cell Biol. 106:945–952, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lotz, M. M., C. A. Burdsal, H. P. Erickson, and D. R. McClay. Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: Quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response. J. Cell Biol. 87:519–523, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, L., T. Cruz, and C. McCullough. Interleukin 1-induced calcium signaling in chondrocytes requires focal adhesions. Biochem. J. 324:653–658, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nugiel, D. J., D. J. Wood, and K. L. P. Sung. Quantification of adhesiveness of osteoblasts to titanium surfaces in vitro by the micropipette aspiration technique. Tissue Eng. 2:127–140, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Otto, M., C. L. Klein, H. Khler, M. Wagner, O. Rhrig, and C. J. Kirkpartric. Dynamic blood cell contact with biomaterials: Validation of a flow chamber system according to international standards. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 8:119–129, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Owens, N. F., and D. Gingell. Inhibition of cell adhesion by a synthetic polymer adsorbed to glass shown under defined hydrodynamic stress. J. Cell. Sci. 87:667–675, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezania, A., C. H. Thomas, A. B. Branger, C. M. Waters, and K. E. Healy. The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting material modified with a peptide sequence found within bone sialoprotein. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 37:9–19, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schakenraad, J. M., H. J. Busscher, C. R. H. Wildevuur, and J. Arends. The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 20:773–784, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schakenraad, J. Cells: Their surfaces and interactions with materials. In: Biomaterials Science, edited by B. Ratner, A. Hoffman, F. Schoen, and J. Lemons. New York: Academic, 1996, pp. 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shin, D., and K. Athanasiou. Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties. J. Orthop. Res. 17:880–890, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trommler, A., D. Gingell, and H. Wolf. Red blood cells experience electrostatic repulsion but make molecular adhesions with glass. Biophys. J. 48:835–841, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Visser, J. Colloid and other forces in particle adhesion and particle removal. Proceedings of the Deposition Filter Part Gases Liquid Symposium. London: Soc. Chem. Ind., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto, A., S. Mishima, N. Maruyama, and M. Sumita. A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material. Biomaterials 19:871–879, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yamamoto, A., S. Mishima, N. Maruyama, and M. Sumita. Quantitative evaluation of cell attachment to glass, polystyrene, and fibronectin-or collagen-coated polystyrene by measurement of cell adhesive shear force and cell detachment energy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 50:114–124, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoben, G., Huang, W., Thoma, B.S. et al. Quantification of Varying Adhesion Levels in Chondrocytes Using the Cytodetacher. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 30, 703–712 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1484218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1484218

Navigation