Abstract
The mechanical performance of natural materials depends on the type, and especially the composition of the molecular constituents. They are almost without exception composite materials, whose characteristics are determined by the characteristics of the individual constituents, their shape, their interaction, and in particular their orientation within the natural material. One of the most impressive natural composites is the insect cuticle. This lightweight building material impresses one with its ability to withstand extremely heavy loading. Even the ultrathin (3–10 μm) membranes of insect wings add greatly to the structural stability of the wings. By means of acoustic microscopy, the present study also shows that the thin covering of wax on the membrane is not an accidental material arrangement. Contrary to that of locust wings, dragonfly wing membranes were found to have a criss-cross fiber-like density gradient within to the waxy layer. This density gradient proved to be mechanically relevant in stabilizing the wings. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.
PAC01: 8719Rr, 8716Dg, 4380Ev
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blackwell, J., and M. A. Weih. Structure of chitin-protein complexes: Ovipositor of the ichneumon fly megarhyssa. J. Mol. Biol. 137:49–60, 1980.
Briggs G. A. D. Acoustic Microscopy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.
Cho, Y. I., H. K. Ho, and S. P. Meyers. Physiochemical characteristics and functional properties of various commer-cial chitin and chitinosan products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3839–3843, 1998.
Dang V. L., and M. H. Dang. In: The Polymeric Materials Encyclopedia: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, edited by J. C. Salomon. Boca Raton: CRC, 1995.
Gorb, S. N., A. B. Kesel, and J. Berger. Microsculpture of the wing surface in Odonata: Evidence for cuticular wax cover-age. Arthro. Struc. Dev. 29:129–135, 2000.
Gordon, J. E. The Science of Structure and Materials. New York: Scientific American Library, 1998.
Hirsekorn, S., S. Pangraz, G. Weides, and W. Arnold. Mea-surement of elastic impedance with high spatial resolution using acoustic microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 67:745–747, 1995; ibid. 69:2138, 1996 (Errata).
Kesel, A. B. Biologisches Vorbild Insektenflügel-Mehrkriterienoptimierung ultraleichter Tragfla¨chen. In: Biona-Report 12, edited by W. Nachtigall and A. Wisser. Stuttgart: Fischer, 1998, pp. 107–117.
Kesel, A. B. The ultralight aerofoils of insects-Evolutionary masterpiece. Zoology 103:222–229, 2001. 10 Kesel, A. B. Material-Struktur-Funktion: Technisches Poten-tial aus der Innovationswerkstatt Natur. In: Biona-Report 15. edited by W. Nachtigall and A. Wisser. Stuttgart: Fischer,2001, pp. 164-176.
Kesel, A. B., U. Philippi, and W. Nachtigall. The insect wing-An ultra light-weight construction: An analysis using the finite element method. In: Proceedings of the IXth Inter-national Conference on Mechanics in Medicine and Biology (Ljubljana, Slovenia), edited by D. Miklavcic, T. Bajd, U. Stanic, and M. Munih. Ljubljana, 1996, pp. 395–398.
Kesel, A. B., U. Philippi, and W. Nachtigall. Biomechanical aspects of insect wings: An analysis using the finite element method. Comput. Biol. Med. 28:423–437, 1998.
Kreuz, P. Vergleichende Untersuchung der Morphologie und der mechanischen Eigenschaften der Kutikula des Insekten-flu¨ gels am Beispiel der Anisoptera (Odonata), PhD thesis (in press).
Kreuz, P., M. Kempf, A. B. Kesel, M. Göken, H. Vehoff, and W. Nachtigall. Materialwissenschaftliche Analysen der Insek-tenkutikula am Beispiel Libellenflu¨ gel. In: Biona-Report 12, edited by W. Nachtigall and A. Wisser. Stuttgart: Fischer, 1998, pp. 327–328.
Kreuz, P., A. B. Kesel, M. Kempf, M. Göken, H. Vehoff, and W. Nachtigall. Struktur-und Materialanalyse Biologischer Systeme am Beispiel Insektenflügel. In: Biona-Report 14, edited by W. Nachtigall and A. Wisser. Stuttgart: Fischer, 2000, pp. 201–202.
Kreuz, P., A. B. Kesel, W. Arnold, H. Vehoff, and W. Nachti-gall. Struktur-und Materialanalyse biologischer Systeme-Die Flu¨ gelkutikula der Insekten (Odonata, Anisoptera). In: Biona-Report 14, edited by W. Nachtigall and A. Wisser. Stuttgart: Fischer, 2000, pp. 16–17.
Neville, A. C. Biology of the Arthropod Cuticle. New York: Springer, 1975, p. 448.
Neville, A. C. Biology of Fibrous Composites. Development Beyond the Cell Membrane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 214–217.
Vincent, J. F. C. Insect cuticle: A paradigm for natural com-posites. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 34:183–210, 1980.
Vincent, J. F. C. Structural Biomaterials. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Wagner, T., C. Neinhuis, and W. Barthlott. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zool. 3:213–225, 1996.
Waterhouse, D. F., and K. R. Norris. Insects and insect physi-ology in the scheme of things. In: Insect Biology in the Future, edited by M. Locke and D. S. Smith, New York: Academic, 1980, pp. 19–37.
Wootton, R. J. Functional morphology of insect wings. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:113–140, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreuz, P., Arnold, W. & Kesel, A.B. Acoustic Microscopic Analysis of the Biological Structure of Insect Wing Membranes with Emphasis on their Waxy Surface. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 1054–1058 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1424921
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1424921