Skip to main content
Log in

Blood Cell Adhesion on Sensor Materials Studied by Light, Scanning Electron, and Atomic-Force Microscopy

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unwanted interactions of biomedical sensors with surrounding tissues, body fluids, and cells are one of the most crucial problems affecting their long-term stability. In vivo processes were simulated in a computer-controlled bioreactor connected to a flow chamber system. Optical sensor materials were inserted into a parallel-plate chamber and monitored by light microscopy in order to get information about the number of adhered cells. Tests with thrombocyte-enriched plasma show that novel phosphorylcholine (PC)–polymer-coated sensors appear to be more bioinert, and thus demonstrate better haemocopatibility in comparison with untreated glass sensors. The influence of different materials on the morphology of adhered cells was investigated by off-line methods such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic-force microscopy (AFM). SEM showed a reduction in the number of adhered thrombocytes and the lack of any fibrin network on the PC–polymer-modified glass surface, in contrast to the pure glass surface. AFM gives topographical information, and the calculated contact areas and cell volumes indicate smaller interactions between cells and sensor material in the case of PC–polymer-coated sensors. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8768+z, 8717-d, 8764Rr, 8764Ee

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Friedbacher, G., and H. Fuchs. Classification of scanning probe microscopies. Pure Appl. Chem. 71:1337–1357, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hayward, J. A., and D. Chapman. Biomembrane surface as a model for polymer design: The potential for haemocompatibility. Biomaterials 5:135–141, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hildebrand, G., M. Frant, K. Liefeith, R. Palmer, T. Vick, and M. Driver. Evaluation of antifouling properties of new biomimetic optical sensor surfaces for applications in medicine, environmental monitoring and biotechnology. In: OPTO 2000 Proceedings, Wunstorf, Germany: AMA Service GmbH, 2000, pp. 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ip, W. F., W. Zing, and M. V. Sefton. Parallel flow arteriovenous shunt for the ex vivo evaluation of heparinized materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19:161–178, 1985.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishihara, K., T. Ueda, and N. Nakabayashi. Preparation of phospholipid polymers and their properties as polymer hydrogel membranes. Polym. J. (Tokyo) 22:255–260, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishihara, K. Inhibition of fibroblast cell adhesion on substrate by coating with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymers. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 10:1047–1061, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasaki, Y., K. Ishihara, N. Nakabayashi, G. Khang, J. W. Lee, and H. B. Lee. Platelet adhesion on the gradient surfaces grafted with phospholipid polymer. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 9:801–816, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y. S., I. K. Kang, M. W. Huh, and S. C. Yoon. Surface characterization and in vitro blood compatibility of poly(ethylene terephthalate) immobilized with insulin and/or heparin using plasma glow discharge. Biomaterials 21:121–130, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liefeith, K., G. Hildebrand, D. Kraft, E. Lenz, and E. Mann. Vergleichende Korrosionspru¨ fung von dentalen Legierungen im Laborbioreaktor. Mater. Corros. 46:157–164, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liefeith, K., G. Hildebrand, J. Donath, and M. Frant. Biomimetic antifouling surfaces based on phospholipids for sensors and medical applications. Proceedings of the 10th Heiligenstädter Kolloquium, 9–11 October 2000 (unpublished).

  11. Park, K. D., T. Okano, C. Nojiri, and S. W. Kim. Heparin immobilization onto segmented polyurethaneurea surfaces-Effect of hydrophilic spacers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22:977–992, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, R. Werkstoffverhalten in Biologischen Systemen. Düsseldorf: VDI, 1994, pp. 269–301.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sjollema, S., H. J. Busscher, and A. H. Weerkamp. Deposition of oral streptococci and polysterene latices onto glass in a parallel-plate flow cell. Biofouling 1:101–112, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wendel, H. P., and G. Ziemer. Coating techniques to improve the hemocompatibility of artificial devices used for extracorporeal circulation. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 16:342–350, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, S., and P. Rolfe. Development of a haemocompatible pO 2 sensor with phospholipid-based copolymer membrane. Biosens. Bioelectron. 11:1019–1029, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, S. F., Y. Benmakroha, and P. Rolfe. Blood compatible material based on cell membrane mimicry for intravascular sensors. Cell Eng. 1:103–108, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, S. F., P. Rolfe, G. Wright, W. Lian, A. J. Milling, S. Tanaka, and K. Ishihara. Physical and biological properties of compound membranes incorporating a copolymer with a phosphorylcholine head group. Biomaterials 19:691–700, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hildebrand, G., Kunze, S. & Driver, M. Blood Cell Adhesion on Sensor Materials Studied by Light, Scanning Electron, and Atomic-Force Microscopy. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 1100–1105 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1424919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1424919

Navigation