Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stimulus Induced pH Changes in Cochlear Implants: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large pH changes have been shown to be potentially harmful to tissue. The present study was designed to examine stimulus induced changes in pH for a variety of stimulus parameters both in vitro and in vivo, in order to ensure that stimulation strategies for neural prostheses result in minimal pH change. Stimulation using charge balanced biphasic pulses at intensities both within and well above maximum clinical levels for cochlear implants (0.025–0.68 μC per phase), were delivered to platinum electrodes in vitro [saline, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or saline with human serum albumin (HSA)], and in vivo (scala tympani). Stimulus rates were typically varied from 62.5 to 1000 pulses per second (pps), although rates of up to 14,500 pps were used in some experiments. The pH level was recorded using a pH indicator (Phenol red) or pH microelectrodes. While electrical stimulation at intensities and rates used clinically showed no evidence of a pH shift, intensities significantly above these levels induced pH changes both in vitro and in vivo. The extent of pH change was related to stimulus rate and intensity. In addition, pH change was closely associated with the residual direct current (dc) level. As expected, stimulation with capacitive coupling induced little dc and a minimal pH shift. Moreover, no pH shift was observed using alternating leading phase pulse trains at intensities up to 0.68 μC per phase and 1000 pps. Saline with HSA or buffered solutions dramatically reduced the extent of pH shift observed following stimulation in unbuffered inorganic saline. Reduced pH shift was also observed following in vivo stimulation. These findings provide an insight into mechanisms of safe change injection in neural prostheses. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719Nn, 4366Ts, 4364Nf, 4364Gz, 8714Ee, 8768+z, 8717Nn, 8715Nn, 8719Bb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballestrasse, C. L., R. T. Ruggeri, and T. R. Beck. Calculations of the pH changes produced in body tissue by a spherical stimulation electrode. Ann. Biomed. Eng.13:405–424, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brummer, S. B., and J. M. Turner. Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.24:59–63, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, P. M., R. K. Shepherd, and J. F. Patrick. Safety studies for a prototype nucleus 22 channel implant at high stimulation rates. Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Cochlear Implant, Pairs, 1995: 1995, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesler, M., The regulation and modulation of pH in the nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. (Oxford)34:401–427, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donaldson, N. d. N., and P. E. K. Donaldson. When are actively balanced biphasic (“Lilly”) stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? II. pH changes; noxious products; electrode corrosion; discussion. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.24:50–56, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Endres, W., P. Grafe, H. Bostock, and G. T. Bruggencate. Changes in extracellular pH during electrical stimulation of isolated rat vagus nerve. Neurosci. Lett.64:201–205, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez, C.Dimensions of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.24:519–523, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guyton, D. L., and F. T. Hambrecht. Theory and design of capacitor electrodes for chronic stimulation. Med. Biol. Eng.12:613–619, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harper, D. S., D. C. Abelson, and M. E. Jensen. Human plaque acidity models. J. Dent. Res.65Spec Iss:1503–1510, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, C. Q. Neuronal damage mechanisms: Cochlear implants. PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne. 2000.

  11. Huang, C. Q., R. K. Shepherd, P. M. Carter, P. M. Seligman, and B. Tabor. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: Direct current measurement in vivo. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.46:461–470, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, C. Q., R. K. Shepherd, P. M. Seligman, and G. M. Clark. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes. Hear. Res.116:55–64, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, C., R. Shepherd, and P. Carter. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: pH changes in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the Twentieth Aust. Neurosci. Soc. 11:216, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konishi, T., P. E. Hamrick, and P. J. Walsh. Ion transport in guinea pig cochlea. Arch. Otolaryngol.86:22–34, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kraig, R. P.Acid-induced injury in elasmobranch brain. Neurosci. Lett.90:119–124, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuseler, A., V. Baelum, O. Fejerskov, and J. Heidmann. Accuracy and precision in vitro of Beetrode® microelectrodes used for intraoral pH measurements. Caries Res.27:183–190, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lilly, J. C., J. R. Hughes, E. C. J. Alvord, and T. W. Galkin. Brief, non-injurious wave forms for stimulation of the brain. Science121:468–469, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macaulay, R. B. Estimated range of current levels used by nucleus implantees. Cochlear Technical Memo no. 71, 1995.

  19. Makimoto, K., T. Takeda, and H. Silverstein. Chemical composition in various compartments of inner ear fluid. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.220:259–264, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McHardy, J., L. S. Robblee, J. M. Marston, and S. B. Brummer. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. IV. Factors influencing Pt dissolution in inorganic saline. Biomaterials1:129–134, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mortimer, J. T., D. Kaufman, and U. Rossmann. Intramuscular electrical stimulation: Tissue damage. Ann. Biomed. Eng.8:235–244, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piersma, B. J., and W. Greatbatch. Coupling reaction at the metal-tissue interface in electrical stimulation with cardiac pacemaker electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc.134:2458–2464, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robblee, L. S., and T. L. Rose. Electrochemical guidelines for selection of protocols and electrode materials for neural stimulation. In: Neural Prostheses, edited by W. F. Agnew and D. B. McCreery. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990, pp. 25–66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robblee, L. S., J. McHardy, J. M. Marston, and S. B. Brummer. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. V. The effect of protein on Pt dissolution. Biomaterials1:135–139, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sherwood, L. Cellular structure and functions. In: Human Physiology from Cell to System, edited by L. Sherwood. St. Paul: West, 1989, pp. 14–57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Swiontek, T., D. Maiman, A. Sances, S. Larson, and D. Hemmy. Effect of electrical current on temperature and pH in cerebellum and spinal cord. Surg. Neurol.14:365–369, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sykova, E., and J. Svoboda. Extracellular alkaline-acid-alkaline transients in the rat spinal cord evoked by peripheral stimulation. Brain Res.512:181–189, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weinman, J.Biphasic stimulation and electrical properties of metal electrodes. J. Appl. Physiol.20:787–790, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, C.Q., Carter, P.M. & Shepherd, R.K. Stimulus Induced pH Changes in Cochlear Implants: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 791–802 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1397793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1397793

Navigation