Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Static and Dynamic Components of Reflex Sensitivity in Spastic Elbow Flexors Using a Muscle Activation Model

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Static and dynamic components of the stretch reflex were studied in elbow flexors of 13 hemiparetic brain-injured individuals. Constant-velocity joint rotations were applied to the elbow, and the resulting stretch reflex torque and electromyographic responses were recorded in the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles. Ten elbow extension velocities between 6 and 150 ° s-1 were applied in random order. The resulting reflex torque response was plotted as a function of elbow angle and fitted with a mathematical model designed to depict elbow flexor activation. We found that four of the six model parameters were essentially independent of test velocity. Conversely, 73% (19/26) of cases involving the other two model parameters were dependent on velocity of joint extension (p<0.05). We conclude from these results that four of the model parameters reflect the static reflex response while the two remaining velocity-dependent parameters reflect the dynamic reflex response. To describe overall velocity dependence of stretch reflexes in spastic elbow muscles, the two dynamic reflex parameters were fitted to a fractional exponential function of velocity, similar to a model previously used to describe spindle firing rate in the cat hindlimb. We found that the mean velocity exponent of the dynamic reflex parameters was 0.24 + 0.17 (s.d.) (N = 13), a value similar to that for muscle spindle velocity sensitivity in reduced animal preparations. We conclude that both static and dynamic reflex sensitivities can be measured by examining different aspects of the torque/angle relation associated with the reflex response to a large-amplitude ramp stretch of the elbow. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719St, 8719Ff, 8710+e

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An, K. N., F. C. Hui, B. F. Money, R. L. Linsheid, and E. Y. Chao. Muscles Across the Elbow Joint: A Biomechanical Analysis. J. Biomech.14:659–669, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashworth, B.Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner192:540–542, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchanan, T. S., D. P. J. Almdale, J. L. Lewis, and W. Z. Rymer. Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. J. Neurophysiol.56:1225–1241, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan, T. S., G. P. Rovai, and W. Z. Rymer. Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow. J. Neurophysiol.62:1201–1212, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edin, B. B., and A. B. Vallbo. Dynamic response of human muscle spindle afferents to stretch. Neurophysiol.63:1297–1306, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eldred, E., R. Granit, and P. A. Merton. Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J. Physiol. (London)122:498–523, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand. J. Rehab. Med.7:13–31, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Given, J. D., J. P. A. Dewald, and W. Z. Rymer. Joint dependent passive stiffness in paretic and contralateral limbs of spastic patients with hemiparetic stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry59:271–279, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Houk, J. C., and W. Z. Rymer. Neural control of muscle length and tension. In: The Nervous System, edited by J.M. Brookhart and V.B. Mountcastle. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 257–324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Houk, J. C., W. Z. Rymer, and P. F. Crago. Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J. Neurophysiol.46:143–168, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, R. T., G. P. Rovai, C. Brait, and W.Z. Rymer. Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia: Correlation with clinical findings. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.73:339–347, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knutsson, E. Quantification of spasticity. In: Electromyography and Evoked Potentials, edited by A. Struppler and A. Weindl. Berlin: Springer, 1985, pp. 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lance, J. W. Pathophysiology of spasticity and clinical experience with baclofen. In: Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control, edited by R. G. Feldman, R. R. Young, and W. P. Koella. Chicago, IL: Year Book, 1980, pp. 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lennerstrand, G., and U. Thoden. Position and velocity sensitivity of muscle spindles in the cat. II. Dynamic fusimotor single-fibre activation of primary endings. Acta Physiol. Scand.74:16–29, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews, P. B. C.The dependence of tension upon extension in the stretch reflex of the soleus muscle of the decerebrate cat. J. Physiol. (London)147:521–546, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matthews, P. B. C.A study of certain factors influencing the stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. J. Physiol. (London)147:547–564, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews, P. B. C.The response of de-efferented muscle spindle receptors to stretching at different velocities. J. Physiol. (London)168:660–678, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matthews, P. B. C. Muscle spindles: Their messages and their fusimotor supply. In: The Nervous System, edited by J. M. Brookhart and V. B. Mountcastle. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 189–228.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murray, W. M., S. L. Delp, and T. S. Buchanan. Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm positions. J. Biomech.28:513–525, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nichols, T. R., and J. C. Houk, Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. J. Neurophysiol.39:119–142, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prochazka, A. Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section 12: Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, edited by L. B. Rowell and J. T. Shepard. New York: American Physiological Society, 1996, pp. 89–127.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prochazka, A., and M. Gorassini. Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J. Physiol. (London)507:277–291, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rymer, W. Z., and R. T. Katz. Mechanical quantification of spastic hypertonia. In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, edited by R. T. Katz. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., 1994, pp. 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmit, B. D., Y. Dhaher, J. P. A. Dewald, and W. Z. Rymer. Reflex torque response to movement of the spastic elbow: Theoretical analyses and implications for quantification of spasticity. Ann. Biomed. Eng.27:815–829, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vallbo, A. B.Afferent discharge from human muscle spindles in non-contracting muscles: Steady state impulse frequency as a function of joint angle. Acta Physiol. Scand.90:303–318, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmit, B.D., Rymer, W.Z. Identification of Static and Dynamic Components of Reflex Sensitivity in Spastic Elbow Flexors Using a Muscle Activation Model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 330–339 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1359496

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1359496

Navigation