Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing the Variability of System Kernel and Input Estimates

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identification of the input to, or kernels of, a system using nonparametric representations and least-squares estimation is becoming increasingly popular. Nonparametric representations avoid making a priori assumptions about the input or having detailed knowledge about the system, and only need to guarantee known general characteristics (for example, positivity), which are obtained through the imposition of constraints on the estimates. An often overlooked problem is how to characterize the variability of the estimates so obtained. This problem is caused by the presence of constraints—and/or the nonlinearities of the estimates, or the complexity of the (regression based) estimation algorithms used—which make standard methods of estimating variability incorrect. In this article we investigate the use of a resampling technique called the “bootstrap” to obtain the desired estimates of variability. We present real data analysis demonstrating the approach, and through simulations we test the performance of a novel bootstrap technique obtaining confidence bands for the estimated functions. © 1998 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC98: 8710+e, 0270Lq

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification problem. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control.19:716-723, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belsley, D. A. Conditioning Diagnostic. New York: Wiley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cobelli, C., and K. Thomaseth. On optimality of the impulse input for linear system identification. Math. Biosci.89:127- 133, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeBoor, C. A Practical Guide to Splines. New York: Springer, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Efron, B. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jacknife. Ann. Statist.4:1-26, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Efron, B. The Jackknife, The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Planes. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goussard, Y. Wiener Kernel estimation: A comparison of cross-correlation and stochastic approximation methods. Ann. Biomed. Eng.16:289-301, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, P. The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. New York: Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hastie, T. J., and R. J. Tibshirani. Generalized Additive Models, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1990, Vol. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iga, K., Y. Ogawa, T. Yashiki, and T. Shimamoto. Estimation of drug absorption rates using a deconvolution method with nonequal sampling times. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm.14:213-225, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaumeier, H. S., O. H. Kehrhahn, G. Neugebauer, D. Shuppan, J. A. Shwarz, and A. H. Staib. A crossover study after oral administration of theophylline in male volunteers (Absolute bioavailability of afonilum tablets). Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol., Ther. Toxicol.21:339-345, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marmarelis, V. Z. Identification of nonlinear biological systems using Laguerre expansions of kernels. Ann. Biomed. Eng.21:573-589, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mukerjee, H., and T. Renjin. Order restricted inferences in linear regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.90:717-728, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muller, H. G. Nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data. In: Lectures Notes in Statistics. New York: Springer, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plusquellec, Y., G. Campistron, J. Barre, L. Jung, J. P. Tillement, and G. Houin. A double-peak phenomenon in the pharmacokinetics of veralipride after oral administration: A double-site model for drug absorption. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm.15:225-239, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Provencher, S. W., and R. H. Vogel. In: Numerical Treatment of Inverse Problems in Differential and Integral Equations, edited by P. Deuflhard and E. Hairer. Boston: Birkhauser, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stine, R. A. Bootstrap prediction intervals for regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.80:1026-1031, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verotta, D. Dept. of Biostatistics, University California Berkeley: PhD dissertation, Chap. 3, University Microfilms International, 1992.

  19. Verotta, D. Concepts, properties, and applications of linear systems to describe the distribution, identify input, and control endogenous substances and drugs in biological systems. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.24:73-139, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verotta, D. Deconvolution. Anaesth. Pharmacol. Rev.2:250- 259, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verotta, D. Estimation and model selection using splines in constrained deconvolution. Ann. Biomed. Eng.21:605-620, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wahba, G. In: Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics III, edited by S. S. Gupta and J. O. Berger. New York: Academic, 1982, Vol. 2. pp. 383-418.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wahba, G. Spline Models for Observational Data. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Working, H., and H. Hotelling. Application of the theory of error to the interpretation of trends. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.24:73-85, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verotta, D. Characterizing the Variability of System Kernel and Input Estimates. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 26, 870–882 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.110

Navigation