Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 894–904 | Cite as

Changes of Flow Characteristics by Stenting in Aneurysm Models: Influence of Aneurysm Geometry and Stent Porosity

  • Kyehan Rhee
  • Moon Hee Han
  • Sang Hoon Cha
Article

Abstract

An endovascular technique using a stent has been developed and successfully applied in the treatment of wide neck aneurysms. A stent can facilitate thrombosis in the aneurysm pouch while maintaining biocompatible passage of the parent artery. Insertion of the stent changes the flow characteristics inside the aneurysm pouch, which can affect the intra-aneurysmal embolization process. The purpose of this study is to clarify the velocity and wall shear stress changes that are caused by stenting in fusiform and lateral aneurysm models. We used a flow visualization technique that incorporated a photochromic dye in order to observe the flow fields and measure the wall shear rates. The intra-aneurysmal flow motion was significantly reduced in the stented aneurysm models. Coherent inflow along the distal wall of the aneurysm was diminished and inflow was distributed along the pores of the stent wall in the stented models. Also, sluggish intra-aneurysmal vortex motion was well maintained in the stented aneurysm models during the deceleration phase. A less porous stent generally reduced the intraneurysmal fluid motion further, but the porosity effect was not significant. The magnitude and pulsatility of the wall shear rate were reduced by stenting, and the reductions were more significant in the lateral aneurysm models compared to the fusiform aneurysm models. The hemodynamic changes that were observed in our study can help explain the efficacy of in vivo thrombus formation caused by stenting. © 2002 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC2002: 8719Uv, 8780-y, 8719Xx

Aneurysm Stent Hemodynamics Wall shear rate Flow visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Aenis, M., A. P. Stancampiano, A. K. Wakhloo, and B. B. Lieber. Modeling of flow in a straight stented and nonstented sidewall aneurysm model. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 119:206-212, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diamond, S. L., J. B. Sharefkin, C. Dieffenbach, K. Frazier-Scott, L. V. McIntire, and S. G. Eskin. Tissue plasminogen activator messenger RNA levels increase in cultured human endothelial cells exposed to laminar shear stress. J. Cell Physiol. 143:364-371, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Francischelli, B. E., J. M. Tarbell, and D. B. Geselowitz. Local blood resident times in the Penn State Artificial Heart. Artif. Organs 15:218-224, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frangos, J. A., L. V. MaIntire, S. G. Eskin, and C. L. Ives. Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 227:1477-1479, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gobin, Y. P., J. L. Counord, P. Flaud, and J. Duffaux. In vitro study of hemodynamics in a giant saccular aneurysm model: Influence of flow dynamics in the parent vessel and effects of coil embolization. Neuroradiology 36:530-536, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grabowski, E. F., E. A. Jaffe, and B. B. Weksler. Prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells exposed to step increases in shear stress. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 105:36-43, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graves, V. B., C. M. Strother, C. R. Partington, and A. Rappe. Flow dynamics of lateral carotid artery aneurysms and their effects on coils and balloons: An experimental study in dogs. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 13:189-196, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayashi, K., H. Handa, S. Nagasawa, A. Okumura, and K. Moritake. Stiffness and elastic behavior human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J. Biomech. 13:175-184, 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knuckey, N., R. Haas, R. Jenkins, and M. Epstein. Thrombosis of difficult intracranial aneurysms by the endovacular placement of platinum-dacron microcoils. J. Neurosurg. 77:43-50, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieber, B. B., A. P. Stancampiano, and A. K. Wakhloo. Alternation of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by tenting: Influence of stent porosity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25:460-469, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marks, M. P., M. D. Dake, G. K. Steinberg, A. M. Norbash, and B. Lane. Stent placement for arterial and venous cerebrovascular disease: Preliminary experience. Radiology 191:441-446, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayberg, M. R., H. H. Batjer, and R. Darcey. Guidelines for the management of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Circulation 90:2592-2605, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nichols, W. W., and M. F. O'Rourke. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. London: Lea and Febiger, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ojha, M., R. L. Hummel, R. S. C. Cobbold, and K. W. Johnston. Development and evaluation of a high resolution photochromic dye method for pulsatile flow studies. J. Phys. E 21:998-1004, 1988.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmaz, J. C. Intravascular stents: Tissue stent interactions and design considerations. AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 160:613-618, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pektold, K., M. Resch, and H. Florian. Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid artery bifurcation model. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 113:464-475, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rhee, K., and S. M. Lee. Effects of wall motion and flow wave form on the wall shear rate distribution in the divergent vascular graft. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:955-964, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rhee, K., and J. M. Tarbell. A study on the wall shear rate distribution near the end-to-end anastomosis of a rigid graft and compliant artery. J. Biomech. 27:329-338, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scott, S., G. G. Ferguson, and M. R. Roach. Comparison of the elastic properties of human intracanial arteries and aneurysm. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 50:328-332, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tominaga, R. H., C. Harasaki, H. Sutton, H. Emoto, H. Kambic, and J. Hollman. Effects of stent design and serum cholesterol level on the restenosis rate in atherosclerotic rabbits. Am. Heart J. 128:1049-1058, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wakhloo, A. J., O. Fermin, B. B. Lieber, F. Schellhammer, M. Graf, and L. N. Hopkins. Self-expanding nitinol sents in canine vertebral arteries: Hemodynamics and tissue response. AJNR, Am. J. Neuroradiol. 16:1043-1051, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wakhloo, A. K., F. Schellhammer, J. de Vries, J. Haberstroh, and M. Schumacher. Self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents in the treatment of carotid aneurysms: An experimental study in a canine model. AJNR, Am. J. Neuroradiol. 15:493-502, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weston, M. W., K. Rhee, and J. M. Tarbell. Compliance and diameter mismatch affect the wall shear rate distribution near an end-to-end anastomosis. J. Biomech. 29:187-198, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitemore R. L. Rheology of the Circulation. Oxford: Pergamon, 1968, pp. 93-133.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu, S. C. M., and J. B. Zhao. A steady flow analysis on the stented and nonstented sidewall aneurysm models. Med. Eng. Phys. 21:133-141, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyehan Rhee
    • 1
  • Moon Hee Han
    • 2
  • Sang Hoon Cha
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMyongji UniversityKyuggidoKorea
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySeoul National University College of MedicineKorea
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyChungbuk National University College of MedicineKorea

Personalised recommendations