Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 247–259 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Gravity and Posture on Cardiac Performance

  • Kristy Peterson
  • Edwin T. Ozawa
  • George M. Pantalos
  • M. Keith Sharp
Article

Abstract

A numerical model of the cardiovascular system was used to quantify the influences on cardiac function of intrathoracic pressure and intravascular and intraventricular hydrostatic pressure, which are fundamental biomechanical stimuli for orthostatic response. The model included a detailed arterial circulation with lumped parameter models of the atria, ventricles, pulmonary circulation, and venous circulation. The venous circulation was divided into cranial, central, and caudal regions with nonlinear compliance. Changes in intrathoracic pressure and the effects of hydrostatic pressure were simulated in supine, launch, sitting, and standing postures for 0, 1, and 1.8 G. Increasing intrathoracic pressure experienced with increasing gravity caused 12% and 14% decreases in cardiac output for 1 and 1.8 G supine, respectively, compared to 0 G. Similar results were obtained for launch posture, in which the effects of changing intrathoracic pressure dominated those of hydrostatic pressure. Compared to 0 G, cardiac output decreased 0.9% for 1 G launch and 15% for 1.8 G launch. In sitting and standing, the position of the heart above the hydrostatic indifference level caused the effects of changing hydrostatic pressure to dominate those of intrathoracic pressure. Compared to 0 G, cardiac output decreased 13% for 1 G sitting and 23% for 1.8 G sitting, and decreased 17% for 1 G standing and 31% for 1.8 G standing. For a posture change from supine to standing in 1 G, cardiac output decreased, consistent with the trend necessary to explain orthostatic intolerance in some astronauts during postflight stand tests. Simulated lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in 0 G reduced cardiac output and mean aortic pressure similar to 1 G standing, suggesting that LBNP provides at least some cardiovascular stimuli that may be useful in preventing postflight orthostatic intolerance. A unifying concept, consistent with the Frank–Starling mechanism of the heart, was that cardiac output was proportional to cardiac diastolic transmural pressure for all postures and gravitational accelerations. © 2002 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC2002: 8765+y, 8719Bb, 8719Uv, 8719Hh

Computer model Postflight orthostatic intolerance Hydrostatic pressure Intrathoracic pressure Spaceflight 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Avolio, A. Multibranched model of the human arterial system. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18:709–718, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avula, X., and H. Oestreicher. Mathematical model of the cardiovascular system under acceleration stress. Aviat., Space Environ. Med. 49:279–286, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomqvist, C., and H. Stone. Cardiovascular adjustments to gravitational stress. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by E. A. Shepherd. Washington, DC: American Physiology Society, 1982, pp. 1025–1063.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckey, J., F. Gaffney, L. Lane, B. Levine, D. Watenpaugh, S. Wright, C. Yancy, D. Meyer, and C. Blomqvist. Central venous pressure in space. J. Appl. Physiol. 81:19–25, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckey, J., L. Lane, B. Levine, D. Watenpaugh, S. Wright, W. Moore, F. Gaffney, and C. Blomqvist. Orthostatic intolerance after spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 81:7–18, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charles, J., M. Bungo, and G. Fortner. Cardiopulmonary function. In: Space Physiology and Medicine (3rd ed.), edited by A. E. Nicogossian et al. Philadelphia: Lea &; Febiger, 1994, pp. 286–304.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Convertino, V. Clinical aspects of the control of plasma volume at microgravity and during return to one gravity. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 28:S45–S52, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Croston, R., and D. Fitzjerrell. Cardiovascular model for the simulation of exercise, lower body negative pressure, and tilt experiments. Modeling Simulation 5:471–476, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, T. Teaching Physiology Through Interactive Simulation of Hemodynamics. Cambridge: MIT, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gauer, O., and H. Thron. Postural change in the circulation. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by W. Hamilton and P. Dow. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, 1965, Sect. 2, p. 2409.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gazenko, O., A. Grigoryev, S. Bugrov, V. Yegorov, V. Bogomolov, I. Kozlovskaya, and I. Tarasov. Review of the major results of medical research during the flight of the second prime crew of the Mir Space Station. Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 23:3–11, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillingham, K., J. Freeman, and McNee. Transfer functions for eye level blood pressure during +Gz stress. Aviat., Space Environ. Med. 48:1026–1034, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green, J. Fundamental Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Physiology: An Integrated Approach to Medicine. Philadelphia: Lea &; Febiger, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green, J., and N. Miller. A model describing the response of the circulatory system to acceleration stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1:455–467, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guyton, A., T. Coleman, and H. Granger. Circulation: Overall regulation. Ann. Rev. Phys. 34:13–46, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaron, D., T. Moore, and J. Bai. Cardiovascular responses to acceleration stress: A computer simulation. Proc. IEEE76:700–707, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaron, D., T. Moore, and C.–L. Chu. A cardiovascular model for studying impairment of cerebral function during +Gz stress. Aviat., Space Environ. Med. 55:24–31, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson, R., G. Hoffler, A. Nicogossian, S. Bergman, and M. Jackson. Lower body negative pressure: Third manned Skylab mission. In: Biomedical Results from Skylab, edited by R. Johnston and L. Dietlein. Washington, DC: NASA, 1977, Chap. 29, pp. 284–312.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kinoshita, M., G. Burns, G. Pantalos, Chiang, and D. Olsen. Atrial compliance changes in animal total artificial heart recipients. ASAIO Trans. 37:M247–M248, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mead, J., and E. Gaensler. Esophageal and pleural pressures in man, upright and supine. J. Appl. Physiol. 14:81–83, 1959.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Melchior, F., R. Srinivasan, and J. Charles. Mathematical modeling of human cardiovascular system for simulation of orthostatic response. Am. J. Physiol. 262:H1920–H1933, 1992 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 31).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Melchior, F., R. Srinivasan, P. Thullier, and J.–M. Clere. Simulation of cardiovascular response to lower body negative pressure from 0 to–40 mm Hg. J. Appl. Physiol. 77:630–640, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niederer, P. Damping mechanisms and shock transitions in the human arterial tree. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 36:204–220, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozawa, E., K. Bottom, X. Xiao, and R. Kamm. Numerical simulation of enhanced external counterpulsation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29:284–297, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pantalos, G., S. Hart, J. Mathias, M. Sharp, D. Watenpaugh, J. Buckey, S. Parnis, A. Hargens, and W. Thornton. Central venous, esophageal, and abdominal pressure in humans during parabolic flight. Am. Soc. Grav. &; Space Biol. Bull. 12:81, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pantalos, G., M. Sharp, S. Woodruff, D. O'Leary, and K. Gillars. Simulation of cardiovascular adaptation to weightlessness. Am. Soc. Grav. &; Space Biol. Bull. 9:32, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pedley, T., R. Schroter, and M. Sudlow. Energy losses and pressure drop in models of human airways. Respir. Physiol. 9:371–386, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prisk, G., H. Guy, A. Elliot, R. Deutschman, and J. West. Pulmonary diffusing capacity, capillary blood volume, and cardiac output during sustained microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 75:15–26, 1993.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rideout, V. Pressure–flow modeling of the cardiovascular system. In: Mathematical and Computer Modeling of Physiological Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, 1991, pp. 68–130.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith, J., and J. Kampine. Circulatory Physiology: The Essentials. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Snyder, M., and V. Rideout. Computer simulation studies of the venous circulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16:325–334, 1969.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stettler, J., P. Niederer, and M. Anliker. Theoretical analysis of arterial hemodynamics including the influence of bifurcations. Part I: Mathematical model and prediction of normal pulse patterns. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 9:145–164, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Suga, H., and K. Sugawa. Instantaneous pressure—volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ. Res. 35:117–126, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Suga, H., K. Sugawa, and L. Demer. Determinants of instantaneous pressure in canine left ventricle: Time and volume specification. Circ. Res. 46:256–263, 1980.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thornton, W., T. Moore, and S. Pool. Fluid shifts in weightlessness. Aviat., Space Environ. Med. 58:A86–A90, 1987.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Videbaek, R., and P. Norsk. A trial distension in humans during weightlessness induced by parabolic flights. J. Appl. Physiol. 83:1862–1866, 1997.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watenpaugh, D. Upper body venous compliance exceeds lower body venous compliance in humans. NASA Technical Memorandum 110409, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watenpaugh, D. J. Buckey, L. Lane, F. Gaffney, W. Moore, B. Levine, S. Wright, and C. Blomqvist. Human leg blood flow and compliance during spaceflight. ASGSB Bull. 6:35, 1992.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watenpaugh, D., and A. Hargens. The cardiovascular system in microgravity. In: Handbook of Physiology—Environmental Physiology, 1995, Chap. 29.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Westerhof, N., F. Bosman, C. DeVries, and A. Noordergraaf. Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. J. Biomech. 2:121–43, 1969.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    White, R., and C. Blomqvist. Central venous pressure and cardiac function during spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 85:738–746, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zeilke, W. Frequency–dependent friction in transient pipe flow. J. Basic Eng. 90:109, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristy Peterson
    • 1
  • Edwin T. Ozawa
    • 2
  • George M. Pantalos
    • 3
  • M. Keith Sharp
    • 1
  1. 1.Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LouisvilleLouisville
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of LouisvilleLouisville

Personalised recommendations