Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 2–10 | Cite as

The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering: History, Status, and Potential Impact

  • William R. Hendee
  • Shu Chien
  • C. Douglas Maynard
  • Donna J. Dean
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the history, current status, and objectives and potential impact of the new National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB). Three of the authors (Hendee, Chien, and Maynard) have been involved over several years in the effort to raise the identity of biomedical imaging and bioengineering at the National Institutes of Health. The fourth author (Dean) is the Acting Director of the newly formed NIBIB. These individuals have an extensive collective knowledge of the events that led to formation of the NIBIB, and are intimately involved in shaping its objectives and implementation strategy. This special report provides a historical record of activities leading to establishment of the NIBIB, and an accounting of present and potential advances in biomedical engineering and imaging that will be facilitated and enhanced by NIBIB. The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering represents a “coming of age” of biomedical engineering and imaging, and offers great potential to expand the research frontiers of these disciplines to unparalleled heights. © 2002 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC2002: 8762+n, 8759-e, 0178+p, 0165+g, 8761-c

Biomedical engineering Biomedical imaging Bioinformatics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Academy of Radiology Research. Imaging Research and the Federal Government: A White Paper. Washington, DC. September, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chien, S., and C. D. Maynard. Newest member of the NIH family. Science 291:1701-1702, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffith, L. G., and A. J. Grodzinsky. Advances in biomedical engineering. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285:556-561, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holman, B. L. Testimony before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, Subcommittee on Public Health and Safety. 24 July, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holman, B. L., and E. C. Nagy. Why we need a National Institute of Biomedical Imaging. Acad. Radiol. 5:211-214, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phase 1 Report of the Panel on Scientific Boundaries for Review, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, January 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Putman, C. E., and J. A. Frank. Enhancement of diagnostic radiologic research and education. Invest. Radiol. 28:552-556, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Report of the NIH Working Group on Review of Bioengineering and Technology and Instrumentation Development Research, Bethesda, MD, May 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Support for Bioengineering Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, September 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tempany, C., and B. McNeil. Advances in biomedical imaging. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285:562-567, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weissleder, R., and U. Mahmood. Molecular imaging. Radiology 219:316-333, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Hendee
    • 1
  • Shu Chien
    • 2
  • C. Douglas Maynard
    • 3
  • Donna J. Dean
    • 4
  1. 1.Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukee
  2. 2.Whitaker Institute of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego
  3. 3.School of MedicineWake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem
  4. 4.National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations