Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 665–676 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Mitral Heart Valve Closure

  • S. Aluri
  • K. B. Chandran

Abstract

A computational fluid dynamic simulation of a mechanical heart valve closing dynamics in the mitral position was performed in order to delineate the fluid induced stresses in the closing phase. The pressure and shear stress fields in the clearance region and near the inflow (atrial) side of the valve were computed during the mitral heart valve closure. Three separate numerical simulations were performed. The atrial chamber pressure was assumed to be zero in all the simulations. The first simulation was steady flow through a closed mitral valve with a ventricular pressure of 100 mm Hg (1.3 kPa). In the second simulation, the leaflet remained in the closed position while the ventricular pressure increased from 0 to 100 mm Hg at a rate of 2000 mm Hg/s (simulating leaflet closure by gravity before the ventricular pressure rise – gravity closure). In the third case, the leaflet motion from the fully open position to the fully closed position was simulated for the same ventricular pressure rise (simulating the normal closure of the mechanical valve). Normal closure (including leaflet motion towards closure, and sudden stop in the closed position) resulted in a relatively large negative pressure transient which was not present in the gravity closure simulation. The wall shear stresses near the housing and the leaflet edge close to the inflow side were around 4000 Pa with normal closure compared to about 725 Pa with gravity closure. The large negative pressure transients and significant increase in wall shear stresses due to the simulation of normal closure of the mechanical valve is consistent with the previously reported increased blood damage during the closing phase. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719Hh, 8780-y, 8719Uv, 8710+e

Negative pressure transients Shear stresses Flow in the clearance region Potential for cavitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aluri, S. Hemolysis induced by a mechanical heart valve closure. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aluri, S., K. B. Chandran, W. E. Richenbacher, and A. Campbell. Water hammer effect in mechanical valve closure (abstract). Ann. Biomed. Eng.26:S-65, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bluestein, D. W., S. Einav, and N. H. C. Hwang. A squeeze flow phenomenon at the closing of a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve prosthesis. J. Biomech.27:1369–1378, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandran, K, B. Cardiovascular Biomechanics, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandran, K. B., and S. Aluri. Mechanical valve closing dynamics: Relationship between velocity of closing, pressure transients, and cavitation initiation. Ann. Biomed. Eng.25:926–938, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandran, K. B., C. S. Lee, and L. D. Chen. Pressure field in the vicinity of mechanical valve occluders at the instant of valve closure: Correlation with cavitation initiation. J. Heart Valve Dis.3:S65–S76, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandran, K. B., E. U. Dexter, S. Aluri, and W. E. Richenbacher. Negative pressure transients with mechanical heart-valve closure: Correlation between in vitro and in vivo results. Ann. Biomed. Eng.26:546–556, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deuvaert, F. E., J. Devriendt, and J. Massaut. Leaflet escape of a mitral Duromedics prosthesis (case report). Acta Chir.89:15–18, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dexter, E. U., S. Aluri, R. R. Radcliffe, H. Zhu, D. D. Carlson, T. E. Heilman, K. B. Chandran, and W. E. Richenbacher. In vivo demonstration of cavitation potential of a mechanical heart valve. ASAIO J.45:436–441, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dimitri, W. R., and B. T. Williams. Fracture of the Duromedics mitral valve housing with leaflet escape. J. Cardiovasc. Surg.31:41–46, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garrison, L. A., T. C. Lamson, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz, R. P. Gaumond, and J. M. Tarbell. An in vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valve cavitation in blood. J. Heart Valve Dis.3:S8–S24, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graf, T., H. Reul, C. Detlefs, R. Wilmes, and G. Rau. Causes and formation of cavitation in mechanical heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis.3:S49–S64, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haddad, Y. A. M.. A comparative study of the shear stresses induced in the leakage back flow produced by four types of heart valve prostheses. J. Eng. Med.204:111–114, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kafesjian, R., M. Howanec, G. D. Ward, L. Diep, L. S. Wagstaff, and R. Rhee. Cavitation damage of pyrolytic carbon in mechanical heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis.3:S2–S7, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kini, V., C. Bachmann, A. Fontaine, S. Deutsch, and J. M. Tarbell. Flow visualization in mechanical heart valves: Occluder rebound and cavitation potential. Ann. Biomed. Eng.28:431–441, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klepetko, W., A. Moritz, G. Mlzoch, H. Schurawitzki, E. Domanis, and E. J. Wolner. Leaflet fracture in Edwards-Duromedics bileaflet valves. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.97:90–94, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar, N., S. Balasundaram, M. Rickard, N. al Halees, and C. M. Duran. Leaflet embolization from Duromedics valves: A report of two cases. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.97:95–97, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamson, T. C., G. Rosenberg, D. B. Geselowitz, S. Deutsch, D. R. Stineberg, J. A. Frangos, and J. M. Tarbell. Relative blood damage in three phases of prosthetic heart valve flow cycle. ASAIO J.39:M626–M633, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, C, S. Dynamics associated with the closure of mechanical valves: Cavitation and clearance flows. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, C. S., and K. B. Chandran. Instantaneous backflow through peripheral clearance of Medtronic-Hall tilting disk valve at the moment of closure. Ann. Biomed. Eng.22:371–380, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, C. S., and K. B. Chandran. Numerical simulation of instantaneous backflow through central clearance of bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve at closure: Shear stresses and pressure fields. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.33:257–263, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, C. S., S. Aluri, and K. B. Chandran. Effect of valve holder flexibility on cavitation initiation with mechanical heart valve prostheses: An in vitro study. J. Heart Valve Dis.5:104–113, 1996.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, C. S., K. B. Chandran, and L. D. Chen. Cavitation dynamics of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Artif. Organs18:758–767, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, C. S., K. B. Chandran, and L. D. Chen. Cavitation dynamics of Medtronic Hall mechanical heart valve prosthesis: Fluid squeezing effect. ASME J. Biomech. Eng.118:97–105, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Makhijani, V. B., H. Q. Yang, A. K. Singhal, and N. H. C. Hwang. Computational analysis of MHV cavitation: Effects of leaflet squeezing and rebound. J. Heart Valve Dis.3:S35–S48, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reif, T. H.. A numerical analysis of backflow between the leaflets of St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prostheses. J. Biomech.24:733–741, 1991.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zapanta, C. M., E. G. Liszka, Jr., T. C. Lamson, D. R. Stinebring, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz, and J. M. Tarbell. A method for real-time in vitro observation of cavitation on prosthetic heart valves. ASME J. Biomech. Eng.116:460–468, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Aluri
    • 1
  • K. B. Chandran
    • 2
  1. 1.GE Medical SystemsMilwaukee
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations