Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 227–235 | Cite as

Finite Element Analysis of the Current-Density and Electric Field Generated by Metal Microelectrodes

  • Cameron C. McIntyre
  • Warren M. Grill
Article

Abstract

Electrical stimulation via implanted microelectrodes permits excitation of small, highly localized populations of neurons, and allows access to features of neuronal organization that are not accessible with larger electrodes implanted on the surface of the brain or spinal cord. As a result there are a wide range of potential applications for the use of microelectrodes in neural engineering. However, little is known about the current-density and electric field generated by microelectrodes. The objectives of this project were to answer three fundamental questions regarding electrical stimulation with metal microelectrodes using geometrically and electrically accurate finite elements models. First, what is the spatial distribution of the current density over the surface of the electrode? Second, how do alterations in the electrode geometry effect neural excitation? Third, under what conditions can an electrode of finite size be modeled as a point source? Analysis of the models showed that the current density was concentrated at the tip of the microelectrode and at the electrode–insulation interface. Changing the surface area of the electrode, radius of curvature of the electrode tip, or applying a resistive coating to the electrode surface altered the current-density distribution on the surface of the electrode. Changes in the electrode geometry had little effect on neural excitation patterns, and modeling the electric field generated by sharply tipped microelectrodes using a theoretical point source was valid for distances >∼ 50μm from the electrode tip. The results of this study suggest that a nearly uniform current-density distribution along the surface of the electrode can be achieved using a relatively large surface area electrode μ00--1000μm2), with a relatively blunt tip (3–6 μm radius of curvature), in combination with∼mμ∼ 1μm) moderately resistive ∼( ∼ 50Ωm). © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719Nn, 0270Dh, 8780-y, 8710+e

Electrode Electrical stimulation Neural stimulation Tissue damage Electric fields Bioelectricity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Agnew, W. F., T. G. H. Yuen, R. R. Carter, D. B. McCreery, and L. A. Bullara. Safe and effective stimulation of neural tissue. 4th26th Quarterly Progress Reports, NINDS Contract N01-NS-5–2324, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagshaw, E. V., and M. H. Evans. Measurement of current spread from microelectrodes when stimulating within the nervous system. Exp. Brain Res. 25:391–400, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbeau, H., D. A. McCrea, M. J. O' Donovan, S. Rossingol, W. M. Grill, and M. A. Lemay. Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res. Rev. 30:27–51, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brummer, S. B., and M. J. Turner. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes I: a method for determination of “real” electrode areas. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24:436–439, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brummer, S. B., and M. J. Turner. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes II: estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non gassing) limits. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24:440–443, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brummer, S. B., J. McHardy, and M. J. Turner. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: trace analysis for dissolved platinum and other dissolved electrochemical products. Brain Behav. Evol. 14:10–22, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carter, R. R., D. B. McCreery, B. J. Woodford, L. A. Bullara, and W. F. Agnew. Micturition control by microstimulation of the sacral spinal cord of the cat: acute studies. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 3:206–214, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geuze, R. H. Two methods for homogenous field defibrillation and stimulation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 21:518–520, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grill, W. M., and J. T. Mortimer. Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 22:23–33, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grill, W. M., N. Bhadra, and B. Wang. Bladder and urethral pressure evoked by microstimulation of the sacral spinal cord in cats. Brain Res. 836:19–30, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, C. Q., and R. K. Shepherd. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. effects of electrode surface area. Hear. Res. 146:57–71, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Irons, B. A frontal solution program for finite element analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2:5–32, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ksienski, D. A. A minimum profile uniform current-density electrode. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:682–692, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Langberg, E. Electrical heating catheter. U.S. Patent 5257635 (1993).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, X., D. B. McCreery, R. R. Carter, L. A. Bullara, T. G. H. Yuen, and W. F. Agnew. Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. IEEE. Trans. Rehab. Eng. 7:315–325, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCreery, D. B., L. A. Bullara, and W. F. Agnew. Neuronal activity evoked by chronically implanted microelectrodes. Exp. Neurol. 92:147–161, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCreery, D. B., W. F. Agnew, T. G. H. Yuen, and L. A. Bullara. Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradic and capacitor electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 16:463–481, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCreery, D. B., W. F. Agnew, T. G. H. Yuen, and L. A. Bullara. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37:996–1001, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCreery, D. B., T. G. H. Yuen, W. F. Agnew, and L. A. Bullara. Stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cochlear nucleus of the cat: histologic and physiologic effects. Hear. Res. 62:42–56, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCreery, D. B., T. G. H. Yuen, W. F. Agnew, and L. A. Bullara. Stimulus parameters affecting tissue injury during microstimulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. Hear. Res. 77:105–115, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCreery, D. B., T. G. H. Yuen, W. F. Agnew, and L. A. Bullara. A characterization of the effects on neuronal excitability due to prolonged microstimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44:931–939, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McIntyre, C. C., and W. M. Grill. Selective microstimulation of central nervous system neurons. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28:219–233, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McIntyre, C. C., and W. M. Grill. Current-density and electric field analysis of microelectrodes using finite element modeling. Proc. World Cong. Med. Phys. Biomed. Eng. WEE301–6, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McNeal, D. R. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 23:329–336, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Normann, R. A., E. M. Maynard, P. J. Rousche, and D. J. Warren. A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis. Vision Res. 39:2577–2587, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Panescu, D., J. G. Whayne, S. D. Fleischman, M. S. Mirotzink, D. K. Swanson, and J. G. Webster. Threedimensional finite element analysis of current density and temperature distributions during radio-frequency ablation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42:879–889, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ranck, J. B. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res. 98:417–440, 1975.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rose, T. L., E. M. Kelliher, and L. S. Robblee. Assessment of capacitor electrodes for intracortical neural stimulation. J. Neuroscience Meth. 12:181–193, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rubinstein,. T., F. A. Spelman, M. Soma, and M. F. Suesserman. Current-density profiles of surface mounted and recessed electrodes for neural prostheses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:864–875, 1987.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmidt, E. M., M. J. Bak, F. T. Hambrecht, C. V. Kufta, D. K. O' Rourke, and P. Vallabhanath. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 119:507–522, 1996.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shannon, R. V. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:424–426, 1992.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silvester, P. P., and R. L. Ferrari. Finite Elements for Electrical Engineers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 28.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stoney, S. D., W. D. Thompson, and H. Asanuma. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. J. Neurophysiol. 31:659–669, 1968.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Suesserman, M. F., F. A. Spelman, and J. T. Rubinstein. In vitro measurement and characterization of current-density profiles produced by nonrecessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38:401–408, 1991.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tungjitkusolmun, S., E. J. Woo, H. Cao, J. Z. Tsai, V. R. Vorperian, and J. G. Webster. Finite element analysis of uniform current-density electrodes for radio-frequency cardiac ablation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:32–39, 2000.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Warman, E. N., W. M. Grill, and D. Durand. Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: determination of excitation thresholds. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1244–1254, 1992.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watson, D. F. Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data. Oxford, Elsevier Science, 1999, p. 101.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weiland, J. D., and D. J. Anderson. Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:911–918, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wiley, J. D., and J. G. Webster. Distributed equivalent-circuit models for circular dispersive electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 29:385–389, 1982.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Woo, E. J., S. Tungjitkuslomun, H. Cao, J. Z. Tsai, J. G. Webster, V. R. Vorperian, and J. A. Will. A new catheter design using needle electrode for subendocardial rf ablation of ventricular muscles: finite element analysis and in vitro experiments. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:23–31, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cameron C. McIntyre
    • 1
  • Warren M. Grill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland

Personalised recommendations