Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 1218–1228 | Cite as

Current Distribution in Skeletal Muscle Activated by Functional Electrical Stimulation: Image-Series Formulation and Isometric Recruitment Curve

  • L. M. Livshitz
  • P. D. Einziger
  • J. Mizrahi
Article

Abstract

The present work develops an analytical model that allows one to estimate the current distribution within the whole muscle and the resulting isometric recruitment curve (IRC). The quasistatic current distribution, expressed as an image series, i.e., a collection of properly weighted and shifted point-source responses, outlines an extension for more than three layers of the classical image theory in conductive plane-stratified media. Evaluation of the current distribution via the image series expansions requires substantially less computational time than the standard integral representation. The expansions use a unique recursive representation for Green's function, that is a generic characteristic of the stratification. This approach permits one to verify which of the tissue electrical properties are responsible for the current density distribution within the muscle, and how significant their combinations are. In addition, the model permits one to study the effect of different electrode placement on the shape and the magnitude of the potential distribution. A simple IRC model was used for parameter estimation and model verification by comparison with experimentally obtained isometric recruitment curves. Sensitivity of the model to different parameters such as conductivity of the tissues and activation threshold was verified. The resulting model demonstrated characteristic features that were similar to those of experimentally obtained data. The model also quantitatively confirmed the differences existing between surface (transcutaneous) and implanted (percutaneous) electrode stimulation. © 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC00: 8719Ff, 8754Dt, 8719Nn, 8717Nn

Functional electrical stimulation Nonhomogeneous medium Green's function Current distribution Image series Volume conductor Isometric recruitment curve (IRC) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Carroll, S. G., R. J. Triolo, H. J. Chizeck, R. Kobetic, and R. Kobetic, and E. B. Marsolais. Tetanic responses of electrically stimulate paralyzed muscle at varying interpulse intervals. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.36:644–653, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter, E., S. Pollack, and C. Brighton. Theoretical determination of the current density distribution in human vertebral bodies during electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.37:606–615, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coburn, B. Neural modeling in electrical stimulation. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.17:133–178, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crago, P. E., P. H. Peckham, J. T. Mortimer, and J. P. Van Der Meulen. The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve, and intramuscular Electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng.2:252–264, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durfee, W. K., and K. E. MacLean. Methods for estimating isometric recruitment curves of electrically stimulated muscle. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.36:654–666, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Einziger, P. D., L. Livshitz, and J. Mizrahi. Rigorous image series expansions of quasistatic Green's functions for regions with planar stratification. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. (submitted).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster, K. R., and H. P. Schwan. Dielectrical properties of tissues. In: CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Field, edited by C. Polk and E. Postow. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1986, pp. 26–95.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friederich, J. A., and R. A. Brand. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J. Biomech.23:91–95, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gorman, P. H., and J. T. Mortimer. The effect of stimulus parameters on the recruitment characteristics of direct nerve stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.30:407–414, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grandjean, P. A., and J. T. Mortimer. Recruitment properties of monopolar and bipolar epimysial electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng.14:53–66, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant, F. S., and G. F. West. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965, pp. 407–414.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grill, W. M. Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Influence of tissue electrical properties. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.46:918–28, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrington, R. F. Field Computation by Moment Methods. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hause, H. A., and J. R. Melcher. Electromagnetic Field and Energy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hummel, J. N. A theoretical study of apparent resistivity in surface potential methods.Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., 97:392–422, 1932.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jack, J. J. B., D. Noble, and R. W. Tsien. Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells. Oxford: Claredon, 1988, pp. 99–129.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keller, G. V., and F. C. Frischknecht. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting. Oxford: Pergamon, 1970, pp. 90–145.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lagace, P. J., J. Fortin, and E. D. Grainic. Interpretation of resistivity sounding measurements in N-layer soil using electrostatic images. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 11:1349–1354, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levin O., J. Mizrahi, M. Gornish, E. Prishkulnik, A. Herskowitz, and E. Isakov. The effect of training by FES on geometry and force of paralyzed thigh muscle Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society and the Fifth, Triennial Conference on Neural Prostheses: Motor System V. Burnaby British Columbia, Aug. 1997, pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levin, O., and J. Mizrahi. EMG and metabolite-based prediction of force in paralyzed quadriceps muscle under interrupted stimulation. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng.7:301–314, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levy, M., J. Mizrahi, and Z. Susak. Recruitment, force and fatigue characteristics of quadriceps muscles of paraplegics isometrically activated by surface functional electrical stimulation. J. Biomed. Eng.12:150–156, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, P., and N. F. Uren. Analytical solution for the point source potential in an anisotropic 3-D half-space. I. Twohorizontal-layer case. Math. Comput. Modeling26:9–27, 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Livshitz, L. Einziger, P. D. Mizrahi. J. A model of finite electrodes in layered media: An hybrid image series and moment method scheme. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, 2000 July 23–28.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McNeal, D. R. Analysis of model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.23:329–337, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mizrahi, J., E. Isakov, and Z. Susak. Myoelectric and force characteristics in transcutaneous isometric FES. Basic Appl. Myology,4:147–154, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Minzly, J., J. Mizrahi, E. Isakov, Z. Susak, and M. Verbeke. Computer-controlled portable stimulator for paraplegic patients. J. Biomed. Eng.15:333–338, 1993.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Plonsey, R. Bioelectric Phenomena. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969, pp. 129–139.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Plonsey, R. Electrical field modeling. In: Neural Stimulation, edited by Myklebust, J. B., Cusick, J. F., Sances, A. J., and Larson S. J. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1985, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ranck, J. B. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review. Brain Res.98:417–440, 1975.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rattay, F. Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Wien: Springer, 1990.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reilly, J. P. Electrical Stimulation and Electropathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 95–132.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reilly, J. P. Applied Bioelectricity. New York: Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roth, B. J. Mechanism for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.22:253–305, 1994.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stefanesco, S., C. Schlumberger, and M. Schlumberger. The distribution of electrical potential about a point electrode in an earth of horizontal, homogeneous, and isotropic beds. J. Phys. Radium1:130–141, 1930.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stegeman, D. F., J. P. C. de Weerd, and E. G. J. Eijkman. A volume conductor study of compound action potentials of nerves: The forward problem. Biol. Cybern. 33:97–111, 1979.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tikhonov, A. N. and A. A. Samarskii. Equations of Mathematical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon, 1963, pp. 427–433.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Veltink, P. H., B. K. van Veen, J. J. Struijk, J. Holsheimer, and H. B. K. Boom. A modeling study of nerve fascicle stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:683–691, 1989.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wait, J. R. Geo-Electromagnetism. New York: Academic, 1982.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walthard, K. M., and M. Tchicaloff. Motor points. In: Electrodiagnosis and Electromyography, edited by E. Licht. New Haven, CT: C. Licht, 1971, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Warman, E. N., W. M. Grill, and D. M. Durand. Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1244–1254, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. M. Livshitz
    • 1
  • P. D. Einziger
    • 2
  • J. Mizrahi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Engineering, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations