Abstract
Sidman (2000) has suggested that in addition to conditional and discriminative stimuli, class-consistent defined responses can also become part of an equivalence class. In the current study, this assertion was tested using a mixed-schedule procedure that allowed defined response patterns to be “presented” as samples in the absence of different occasioning stimuli. Four typically developing adults were first trained to make distinct response topographies to 2 visual color stimuli and then were taught to match those color stimuli to 2 different form-sample stimuli in a matching task. Three separate tests were given in order to determine whether training had established 2 classes, each composed of a response, a color, and a form: a form-response test in which the forms were presented to test if the participants would make differential responses to them and 2 response-matching tests to determine if the participants would match visual stimulus comparisons to response-pattern samples. Three of the 4 participants showed class-consistent responding in the tests, although some participants needed additional training prior to passing the tests. In general, the data indicated that the different response patterns had entered into a class with the visual stimuli. These results add to a growing literature on the role of class-consistent responding in stimulus class formation and provide support for the notion that differential responses themselves can become a part of an equivalence class.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133–152.
BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30.
BARROS, R. S., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2006). Equivalence class formation via identity matching to sample and simple discrimination with class-specific consequences. Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 79–92.
BRAGA-KENYON, R. R., ANDRADE, M., AHEARN, W. H., & SIDMAN, M. (2006). Inclusion of defined responses in equivalence relations: A systematic replication of Manabe et al. (1995). Paper presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Association of Behavior Anaysis, Atlanta, GA.
CARR, D., WILKINSON, K. M., BLACKMAN, D., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101–114. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-101
DE ROSE, J. C. (1996). Controlling factors in conditional discriminations and tests of equivalence. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 253–277). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1995). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and emergent matching to sample. The Psychological Record, 45, 591–612.
DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159–175. doi:10.1901/jeab.l987.47&-159
DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MAGUIRE, R. A., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1989). Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 65–76. doi:10.1901/jeab.l989.51-65
DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267. doi:10.1901/jeab.l994.62-251
DYMOND, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184. doi:10.1901/jeab.l995.64-163
JOSEPH, B., OVERMIER, J. B., & THOMPSON, T. (1997). Food and nonfood related differential outcomes in equivalence learning by adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 374–386.
LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2003). Rebirth of the Shriver Automated Teaching Laboratory. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 21, 12–17.
LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (2003). A procedure for generating differential “sample” stimuli without different exteroceptive stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 21–35. doi:10.1901/jeab.2003.79&-21
MANABE, K., KAWASHIMA, T., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1995). Differential vocalization in budgerigars: Towards an experimental analysis of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jeab.l995.63-lll
MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., KLEDARAS, J. B., DE ROSE, J. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1992). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and conditional discrimination. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 43–67). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SAUNDERS, K. J., & WILLIAMS, D. C. (1998). Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control? Some thoughts on experimental control procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 321–324. doi:10.1901/jeab.l998.70-321
SCHENK, J. J. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 44, 537–558.
SHIMIZU, H. (2006). Testing response-stimulus equivalence relations using differential responses as samples. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 239–251. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.04-03
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.l982.37-5
URCUIOLI, P. J., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., MICHALEK, S., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2006). Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 81–107 doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.52-05
URCUIOLI, P. J., PIERCE, J. N., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., FRIEDRICH, A., FETTERMAN, J. C., & GREEN, C. (2002). The development of differential sample behavior in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 409–432. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-409
URCUIOLI, P., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2008a). Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 341–358. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008-89-341
URCUIOLI, P., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2008b). On the origins of emergent differential sample behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 61–80. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.90-61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NICHD Grants HD 39816 and HD 04147.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lionello-DeNolf, K.M., Braga-Kenyon, P. Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes. Psychol Rec 63, 769–784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005