Skip to main content
Log in

Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sidman (2000) has suggested that in addition to conditional and discriminative stimuli, class-consistent defined responses can also become part of an equivalence class. In the current study, this assertion was tested using a mixed-schedule procedure that allowed defined response patterns to be “presented” as samples in the absence of different occasioning stimuli. Four typically developing adults were first trained to make distinct response topographies to 2 visual color stimuli and then were taught to match those color stimuli to 2 different form-sample stimuli in a matching task. Three separate tests were given in order to determine whether training had established 2 classes, each composed of a response, a color, and a form: a form-response test in which the forms were presented to test if the participants would make differential responses to them and 2 response-matching tests to determine if the participants would match visual stimulus comparisons to response-pattern samples. Three of the 4 participants showed class-consistent responding in the tests, although some participants needed additional training prior to passing the tests. In general, the data indicated that the different response patterns had entered into a class with the visual stimuli. These results add to a growing literature on the role of class-consistent responding in stimulus class formation and provide support for the notion that differential responses themselves can become a part of an equivalence class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARROS, R. S., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2006). Equivalence class formation via identity matching to sample and simple discrimination with class-specific consequences. Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAGA-KENYON, R. R., ANDRADE, M., AHEARN, W. H., & SIDMAN, M. (2006). Inclusion of defined responses in equivalence relations: A systematic replication of Manabe et al. (1995). Paper presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Association of Behavior Anaysis, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARR, D., WILKINSON, K. M., BLACKMAN, D., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101–114. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DE ROSE, J. C. (1996). Controlling factors in conditional discriminations and tests of equivalence. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 253–277). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1995). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and emergent matching to sample. The Psychological Record, 45, 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159–175. doi:10.1901/jeab.l987.47&-159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MAGUIRE, R. A., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1989). Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 65–76. doi:10.1901/jeab.l989.51-65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267. doi:10.1901/jeab.l994.62-251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184. doi:10.1901/jeab.l995.64-163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • JOSEPH, B., OVERMIER, J. B., & THOMPSON, T. (1997). Food and nonfood related differential outcomes in equivalence learning by adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 374–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., & MCILVANE, W. J. (2003). Rebirth of the Shriver Automated Teaching Laboratory. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 21, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (2003). A procedure for generating differential “sample” stimuli without different exteroceptive stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 21–35. doi:10.1901/jeab.2003.79&-21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MANABE, K., KAWASHIMA, T., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1995). Differential vocalization in budgerigars: Towards an experimental analysis of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jeab.l995.63-lll

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., KLEDARAS, J. B., DE ROSE, J. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1992). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and conditional discrimination. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 43–67). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, K. J., & WILLIAMS, D. C. (1998). Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control? Some thoughts on experimental control procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 321–324. doi:10.1901/jeab.l998.70-321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHENK, J. J. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 44, 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHIMIZU, H. (2006). Testing response-stimulus equivalence relations using differential responses as samples. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 239–251. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.04-03

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.l982.37-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., MICHALEK, S., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2006). Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 81–107 doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.52-05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., PIERCE, J. N., LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M., FRIEDRICH, A., FETTERMAN, J. C., & GREEN, C. (2002). The development of differential sample behavior in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 409–432. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-409

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2008a). Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 341–358. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008-89-341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P., & VASCONCELOS, M. (2008b). On the origins of emergent differential sample behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 61–80. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.90-61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. Lionello-DeNolf.

Additional information

This research was supported by NICHD Grants HD 39816 and HD 04147.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lionello-DeNolf, K.M., Braga-Kenyon, P. Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes. Psychol Rec 63, 769–784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005

Key words

Navigation