Abstract
Aló and Cançado’s (this issue) primary argument is that motivation should be described in terms of an intervening variable. Furthermore, they raise secondary points concerning the status and usage of technical terms and the scope of the motivational concept in behavior analysis. We agree with Aló and Cançado that a clear definition of motivation is essential. However, we disagree with their analysis on a number of fundamental points, such as the correct use of technical terms, the range of phenomena that should be considered as motivational, and we argue that the concept of the intervening variable is incompatible with radical behaviorism. We contend that motivation is best conceptualized as factors that influence the rate of operant responding but that are not part of the operant contingency and that, as with the term reinforcement, the terms operation and process are useful distinctions that should be employed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CATANIA C. A. (1969). On the vocabulary and the grammar of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 845–846.
CATANIA, C. A. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
CATANIA, A. C. & HARNAD, S. (Eds.). (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
COLE, M. R. (2001). The long-term effect of high-and low-rate responding histories on fixed-interval responding in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 43–54.
COOPER, J. O., HERON, T. E., & HEWARD, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan.
MACCORQUODALE, K., & MEEHL, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55(2), 307–321.
MOORE, J. (2008). A critical appraisal of contemporary approaches in the quantitative analysis of behavior. The Psychological Record, 58(4), 641–664.
MOORE, J. (2010). Philosophy of science, with special consideration given to behaviorism as the philosophy of the science of behavior. The Psychological Record, 60(1), 137–150.
SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford, UK: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
WHELAN, R., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2010). Consequence valuing as operation and process: A parsimonious analysis. The Psychological Record, 60, 337–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D. Commentary on “Coming to Terms with Motivation in the Behavior-Analytic Literature” by Aló and Cançado. Psychol Rec 63, 655–660 (2013). https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.017
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.017