Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing sleep using hip and wrist actigraphy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Biological Rhythms Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wrist actigraphy is commonly used to measure sleep, and hip actigraphy is commonly used to measure activity. It is unclear whether hip-based actigraphy can be used to measure sleep. This study assessed the validity of wrist actigraphy and hip actigraphy compared to polysomnography (PSG) for the measurement of sleep. 108 healthy young adults (22.7 ± 0.2 years) wore hip and wrist GTX3+ Actigraph during overnight PSG. Measurements of total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were derived and compared between wrist actigraphy, hip actigraphy and PSG. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of wrist actigraphy and hip actigraphy for each variable were derived from epoch-by-epoch comparison to PSG. Compared to PSG: TST and SE were similar by wrist actigraphy but overestimated by hip actigraphy (both by 14%); SOL was underestimated by wrist actigraphy and hip actigraphy (by 39 and 80%, respectively); WASO was overestimated by wrist actigraphy and underestimated by hip actigraphy (by 34 and 65%, respectively). Compared to PSG the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of wrist actigraphy were 90, 46 and 84%, respectively; and of hip actigraphy were 99, 14 and 86%, respectively. This study showed that using existing algorithms, a GTX3+ Actigraph worn on the hip does not provide valid or accurate measures of sleep, mainly due to poor wake detection. Relative to the hip, a wrist worn GTX3+ Actigraph provided more valid measures of sleep, but with only moderate capability to detect periods of wake during the sleep period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mathie MJ, Coster AC, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol. Meas. 2004; 25: R1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tryon WW. Nocturnal activity and sleep assessment. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 1996; 16: 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adkins KW, Goldman SE, Fawkes D et al. A pilot study of shoulder placement for actigraphy in children. Behav. Sleep Med. 2012; 10: 138–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Middelkoop HA, van Dam EM, Smilde-van den Doel DA, Van Dijk G. 45-hour continuous quintuple-site actimetry: relations between trunk and limb movements and effects of circadian sleep-wake rhythmicity. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 199–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paavonen EJ, Fjälberg M, Steenari M-R, Aronen ET. Actigraphy placement and sleep estimation in children. Sleep 2002; 25: 235–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Enomoto M, Endo T, Suenaga K et al. Newly developed waist actigraphy and its sleep/wake scoring algorithm. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 2009; 7: 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zinkhan M, Berger K, Hense S et al. Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography. Sleep Med. 2014; 15: 1107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgenthaler TI, Lee-Chiong T, Alessi C et al. Practice parameters for the clinical evaluation and treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine report. Sleep 2007; 30: 1445–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: 181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accel-erometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011; 22 (1): 7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinder JR, Lee KA, Thompson H, Hicks K, Topp K, Madsen KA. Validation of a hip-worn accelerometer in measuring sleep time in children. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2012; 27: 127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hjorth MF, Chaput JP, Damsgaard CT et al. Measure of sleep and physical activity by a single accelero-meter: can a waist-worn Actigraph adequately measure sleep in children? Sleep Biol. Rhythms 2012; 10: 328–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McKnight CM, Newnham JP, Stanley FJ et al. Birth of a cohort-the first 20 years of the Raine study. Med. J. Aust. 2012; 197: 608–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE et al. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. American Academy of Sleep Medicine: Darien, IL, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sadeh A, Sharkey KM, Carskadon MA. Activity-based sleep-wake identification: an empirical test of methodological issues. Sleep 1994; 17: 201–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346 (8982): 1085–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP. The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 2003; 26: 342–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tryon WW. Issues of validity in actigraphic sleep assessment. Sleep 2004; 27: 158–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadeh A. The role and validity of actigraphy in sleep medicine: an update. Sleep Med. Rev. 2011; 15: 259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blood ML, Sack RL, Percy DC, Pen JC. A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnography. Sleep 1997; 20: 388–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marino M, Li Y, Rueschman MN et al. Measuring sleep: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of wrist actigraphy compared to polysomnography. Sleep 2013; 36: 1747–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadeh A, Acebo C. The role of actigraphy in sleep medicine. Sleep Med. Rev. 2002; 6: 113–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moser D, Anderer P, Gruber G et al. Sleep classification according to AASM and Rechtschaffen & Kales: effects on sleep scoring parameters. Sleep 2009; 32: 139–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grigg-Damberger MM. The AASM Scoring Manual four years later. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2012; 8: 323–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. de Souza L, Benedito-Silva AA, Pires ML, Poyares D, Tufik S, Calil HM. Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies. Sleep 2003; 26: 81–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meltzer LJ, Walsh CM, Traylor J, Westin AML. Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents. Sleep 2012; 35: 159–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Eastwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slater, J.A., Botsis, T., Walsh, J. et al. Assessing sleep using hip and wrist actigraphy. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 13, 172–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/sbr.12103

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sbr.12103

Key words

Navigation