This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., and Benjamin, A.C., “Experimental techniques in the field of pipeline integrity,” Experimental Techniques 30(4):44–50 (2006).
Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., and Benjamin, A.C., “Experimental strain analysis of metal loss defects in pipeline,” Experimental Techniques 30(5):42–47 (2006).
Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., Castro, J.T.P. and Benjamin, A.C., “Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss,” Experimental Techniques 30(6):60–65 (2006).
Souza, R.D., Benjamin, A.C., Vieira, R.D., Freire, J.L.F., and Castro, J.T.P., “Rupture tests of pipeline segments containing long real corrosion defects,” Experimental Techniques 31(1):46–51 (2007).
Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., Castro, J.T.P., and Benjamin, A.C., “Rupture tests of pipeline containing complex-shaped metal loss defects,” Experimental Techniques. 31(2):57–62 (2007).
Benjamin, A.C., Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., Diniz, J.L.C., and Andrade, E.Q., “Burst tests on pipeline containing interacting corrosion defects,” Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2005, American Society for Mechanical Engineers—ASME, New York, June 12–16, Haikidiki, Greece (2005).
Benjamin, A.C., Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., and Andrade, E.Q., “Burst tests on pipeline containing closely spaced corrosion defects,” Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2006, American Society for Mechanical Engineers—ASME, New York, June, 4–9, Hamburg, Germany (2006).
Benjamin, A.C., and Cunha, D.J.S., “New method for the assessment of colonies of corrosion defects,” Journal of Pipeline Integrity, Quarter 3, 145–161 (2006).
ASME. ASME-B31G—Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines—A Supplement to ANSI/ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1991).
DNV. Corroded Pipelines—Recommended Practice RP-F101, Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway (1999).
Kiefner, J.F., and Vieth, P.H., A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe, Final Report on Project PR 3-805, Pipeline Research Committee, American Gas Association, Washington, DC (1989).
Kiefner, J.F., and Vieth, P.H., “Evaluating pipe conclusion: PC program speeds new criterion for evaluating corroded pipe,” Oil & Gas Journal 88(34):91–93 (1990).
Pipeline Operator Forum Document. Specifications and requirements for intelligent pig inspection of pipelines, Version 3.2, European Pipeline Operator Forum (2005).
API RP 579. Fitness-For-Service, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2000).
Fu, B., and Batte, D., An Overview of Advanced Methods for the Assessment of Corrosion in Line pipe, Offshore Technology Report—OTO 1999 051, Health & Safety Executive (HSE), UK, Research Strategy Unit, Bootle, Merseyside, L20 3DL (1999).
API Specification 5L. Specification for Line Pipe, 43rd edition, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benjamin, A.C., Freire, J.L.F. & Vieira, R.D. Part 6: Analysis of pipeline containing interacting corrosion defects. Exp Tech 31, 74–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00190.x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00190.x