Skip to main content
Log in

Impulse hammer versus shaker excitation for the modal testing of building floors

  • Feature
  • Structural Testing Series: Part 7
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. APS Dynamics Inc. (undated). Instruction Manual: ELEC-TRO-SEIS Model 113 Shaker. Carlsbad, CA, USA: Author.

  2. Brown, D., Carbon, G. and Ramsey, K. (1977). Survey of Excitation Techniques Applicable to the Testing of Automotive Structures. Society of Automotive Engineers: International Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition. Detroit, USA. 28 February–4 March, pp1–15.

  3. DTA. (1993). DTA Handbook-Volume 3-Modal Testing. London, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dytran. (undated). Operating Guide-Model 5803A Instrumented Impulse Hammer Twelve Pound Sledge. Chatsworth, California, USA: Dytran Instruments Inc.

  5. Ewins, D. J. (1995). Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Taunton, UK: Research Studies Press and John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imregun, M. and Ewins, D. J. (1995). Complex Modes-Origins and Limits. Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference. Nashville, Tennessee, USA: SEM. pp496–506.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olsen, N. (1984). Excitation Functions for Structural Frequency Response Measurements. Proceedings of the 2nd International Modal Analysis Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA: SEM. pp894–902.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osborne, K. P. and Ellis, B. R. (1990). Vibration Design and Testing of a Long-Span Lightweight Floor. The Structural Engineer, 68(10), pp181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pavic, A. and Waldron, P. (1998). Instrumented Sledge Hammer Impact Excitation: Worked Examples. Proceedings of the 16th International Modal Analysis Conference. Santa Barbara, California, USA: SEM.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds, P. (2000). The Effects of Raised Access Flooring on the Vibrational Performance of Long-Span Concrete Floors. PhD Thesis. University of Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taber, R. C., Brown, D. L., Vold, H. and Rocklin, G. T. (1985). Exponential Window for Burst Random Excitation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Modal Analysis Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA: SEM. 28–31 January, pp840–844.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editor’s Note: This paper is of practical use to people involved in, or interested in performing, modal testing on building floor structures. Paul Reynolds and Aleksandar Pavic present an interesting comparison between impulse hammer and shaker testing techniques for building floors. The merits and limitations of each technique are discussed in this interesting article. This paper is a complement to the one published by the same authors in the September/October 1999 issue of ET. A third companion paper on the same subject will be published this year, completing a useful 3-part series reference on the dynamic testing of building floors.

We hope you find this three-part series of articles interesting and informative. — Carlos Ventura, Feature Series Editor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynolds, P., Pavic, A. Impulse hammer versus shaker excitation for the modal testing of building floors. Exp Tech 24, 39–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2000.tb00911.x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2000.tb00911.x

Navigation