References
APS Dynamics Inc. (undated). Instruction Manual: ELEC-TRO-SEIS Model 113 Shaker. Carlsbad, CA, USA: Author.
Brown, D., Carbon, G. and Ramsey, K. (1977). Survey of Excitation Techniques Applicable to the Testing of Automotive Structures. Society of Automotive Engineers: International Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition. Detroit, USA. 28 February–4 March, pp1–15.
DTA. (1993). DTA Handbook-Volume 3-Modal Testing. London, UK: Author.
Dytran. (undated). Operating Guide-Model 5803A Instrumented Impulse Hammer Twelve Pound Sledge. Chatsworth, California, USA: Dytran Instruments Inc.
Ewins, D. J. (1995). Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Taunton, UK: Research Studies Press and John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Imregun, M. and Ewins, D. J. (1995). Complex Modes-Origins and Limits. Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference. Nashville, Tennessee, USA: SEM. pp496–506.
Olsen, N. (1984). Excitation Functions for Structural Frequency Response Measurements. Proceedings of the 2nd International Modal Analysis Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA: SEM. pp894–902.
Osborne, K. P. and Ellis, B. R. (1990). Vibration Design and Testing of a Long-Span Lightweight Floor. The Structural Engineer, 68(10), pp181–186.
Pavic, A. and Waldron, P. (1998). Instrumented Sledge Hammer Impact Excitation: Worked Examples. Proceedings of the 16th International Modal Analysis Conference. Santa Barbara, California, USA: SEM.
Reynolds, P. (2000). The Effects of Raised Access Flooring on the Vibrational Performance of Long-Span Concrete Floors. PhD Thesis. University of Sheffield, UK.
Taber, R. C., Brown, D. L., Vold, H. and Rocklin, G. T. (1985). Exponential Window for Burst Random Excitation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Modal Analysis Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA: SEM. 28–31 January, pp840–844.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Editor’s Note: This paper is of practical use to people involved in, or interested in performing, modal testing on building floor structures. Paul Reynolds and Aleksandar Pavic present an interesting comparison between impulse hammer and shaker testing techniques for building floors. The merits and limitations of each technique are discussed in this interesting article. This paper is a complement to the one published by the same authors in the September/October 1999 issue of ET. A third companion paper on the same subject will be published this year, completing a useful 3-part series reference on the dynamic testing of building floors.
We hope you find this three-part series of articles interesting and informative. — Carlos Ventura, Feature Series Editor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, P., Pavic, A. Impulse hammer versus shaker excitation for the modal testing of building floors. Exp Tech 24, 39–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2000.tb00911.x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2000.tb00911.x