Learning from mistakes

Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors


CONTEXT: Trainees are exposed to medical errors throughout medical school and residency. Little is known about what facilitates and limits learning from these experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To identify major factors and areas of tension in trainees’ learning from medical errors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Structured telephone interviews with 59 trainees (medical students and residents) from 1 academic medical center. Five authors reviewed transcripts of audiotaped interviews using content analysis.

RESULTS: Trainees were aware that medical errors occur from early in medical school. Many had an intense emotional response to the idea of committing errors in patient care. Students and residents noted variation and conflict in institutional recommendations and individual actions. Many expressed role confusion regarding whether and how to initiate discussion after errors occurred. Some noted the conflict between reporting errors to seniors who were responsible for their evaluation. Learners requested more open discussion of actual errors and faculty disclosure. No students or residents felt that they learned better from near misses than from actual errors, and many believed that they learned the most when harm was caused.

CONCLUSIONS: Trainees are aware of medical errors, but remaining tensions may limit learning. Institutions can immediately address variability in faculty response and local culture by disseminating clear, accessible algorithms to guide behavior when errors occur. Educators should develop longitudinal curricula that integrate actual cases and faculty disclosure. Future multi-institutional work should focus on identified themes such as teaching and learning in emotionally charged situations, learning from errors and near misses and balance between individual and systems responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001;286:415–20.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001;322:517–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Braithwaite RS, DeVita MA, Mahidhara R, Simmons RL, Stuart S, Foraida M. Medical Emergency Response Improvement Team (MERIT). Use of medical emergency team (MET) responses to detect medical errors. Qual Safety Health Care. 2004;13:255–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Classen DC, Kilbridge PM. The roles and responsibility of physicians to improve patient safety within health care delivery systems. Acad Med. 2002;77:963–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ziegelstein RC, Fiebach NH. “The mirror” and “the village”: a new method for teaching practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based Practice. Acad Med. 2004;79:83–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: The IOM Health Care Quality Initiative. Washington, DC; National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Institute of Medicine. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liang BA. A system of medical error disclosure. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11:64–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mazor KM, Simon SR, Yood RA, et al. Health plan members’ views about disclosure of medical errors. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 16;140:409–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mazor KM, Simon SR, Yood RA, et al. Health plan members’ views on forgiving medical errors. Am J Managed Care. 2005;11:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003;289:1001–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mazor KM, Fischer MA, Haley H-L, Hatem D, Quirk ME. Teaching and learning around medical errors: primary care preceptors’ views. Med Educ. 39:982–90.

  14. 14.

    Patient Safety and Graduate Medical Education. AAMC Report from the Joint Committee of the Group on Resident Affairs and Organization of Resident Representatives. February 2003.

  15. 15.

    Volpp KG, Grande MD. Residents’ suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:851–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schenkel S, Khare R, Rosenthal M, Sutcliffe K, Lewton E. Resident perceptions of medical errors in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:1218–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    ACGME Outcomes Project. www.ACGME.org/Outcomes.

  18. 18.

    Pierluissi E, Fischer MA, Campbell AR, Landefeld CS. Discussion of medical errors in morbidity and mortality conferences. JAMA. 2003;290:2838–42.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mizrahi T. “Managing medical mistakes: ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training.” Soc Sci Med. 1984;19:135–46.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wu AW, Folkman S, McPhee SJ, Lo B. Do house officers learn from their mistakes? JAMA. 1991;265:2089–94.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thiedke C, Blue AV, Chessman AW, Keller AH, Mallin R. Student observations and ratings of preceptor’s interactions with patients: the hidden curriculum. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16:312–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ. 2004;329:770–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hundert EM, Hafferty F, Christakis D. Characteristics of the informal curriculum and trainees’ ethical choices. Acad Med. 1996;71:624–42.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Stern D. Practicing what we preach? An analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med. 1998;104:569–75.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect. Attending physicians’ responses to problematic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:49–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ende J, Pomerantz A, Erickson F. Preceptors’ strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: a qualitative analysis. Acad Med. 1995;70:224–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McCafferty MH, Polk HC Jr. Addition of “near-miss” cases enhances a quality improvement conference. Arch Surg. 2004;139:216–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. Melissa A. Fischer MD, MEd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, M.A., Mazor, K.M., Baril, J. et al. Learning from mistakes. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 419–423 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x

Download citation

Key words

  • medical errors
  • medical education
  • UME
  • GME
  • teaching methods