Skip to main content
Log in

Faculty development needs

Comparing community-based and hospital-based internal medicine teachers

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared prior training in 4 areas (general teaching skills, teaching specific content areas, teaching by specific methods and in specific settings, and general professional skills) among community-based teachers based in private practices (N=61) compared with those in community sites operated by teaching institutions (N=64) and hospital-based faculty (N=291), all of whom attended one of three national faculty development conferences. The prevalence of prior training was low. Hospital-based faculty reported the most prior training in all 4 categories, teaching hospital affiliated community-based teachers an intermediate amount, and private practice community-based teachers the least (all P<.05). This association remained after multivariable adjustment for age, gender, and amount of time spent in teaching and clinical activities. Preferences for future training reported frequently by the private practice community-based teachers included: time management (48%); teaching evidence-based medicine (46%); evaluation of learners (38%); giving feedback (39%); outpatient precepting (38%); and “teaching in the presence of the patient” (39%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vinson DC, Paden C, Devera-Sales A, Marshall B, Waters EC. Teaching medical students in community-based practices: a national survey of generalist physicians. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:487–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowen JL, Alguire P, Tran LK, et al. Meeting the challenges of teaching in ambulatory settings: a national, collaborative approach for internal medicine. Am J Med. 1999;107:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Bergen MR, Sampson K, Deutsch SL. Regional teaching improvement programs for community-based teachers. Am J Med. 1999;106:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crist TB, Clayton CP. Generalist faculty teaching in community-based settings: an interim report on the General Internal Medicine Faculty Development Project. Am J Med. 2001;111:588–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steele D, Susman J, McCurdy F, O’Dell D, Paulman P, Stott J. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Project at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Acad Med. 2001;76(suppl 4):S121-S6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parenti CM, Moldow CF. Training internal medicine residents in the community: the Minnesota experience. Acad Med. 1995;70:366–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeWitt TG, Goldberg RL, Roberts KB. Developing community faculty. Principles, practice, and evaluation. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147:49–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collier V, Curtin P. A comprehensive community-based program for training internal medicine residents in ambulatory settings. Acad Med. 1997;72:448–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kollisch DO, Gephart D, Brooks WB, Gagne R, Allen C, Donahue D. Impact of a preceptor education board and computer network to engage community faculty at Dartmouth Medical School. Acad Med. 1999;74(suppl 1):S70-S74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark JM, Houston TK, Kolodner K, Branch WT, Levine RB, Kern DE. Teaching the teachers: national survey of faculty development in departments of medicine of U.S. teaching hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;19:205–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Houston MD, MPH.

Additional information

This work was supported by funding from the Association of Professors of Medicine and by the following federal (DHHS) fellowship training grants: NHLBI 2T32 HL07180 (JMC), HRSA 5T32 PE 10025 (TKH), and HRSA 6D14HP00049-02 (RBL).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houston, T.K., Ferenchick, G.S., Clark, J.M. et al. Faculty development needs. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 375–379 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30619.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30619.x

Key words

Navigation