Skip to main content

The impact of evidence on physicians’ inpatient treatment decisions

Journal of General Internal Medicine volume 19, pages 402–409 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that most medical inpatients receive treatment supported by strong evidence (evidence-based treatment), but they have not assessed whether and how physicians actually use evidence when making their treatment decisions. We investigated whether physicians would change inpatient treatment if presented with the results of a literature search.

DESIGN: Before-after study.

SETTING: Large public teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 146 inpatients cared for by 33 internal medicine attending physicians.

INTERVENTIONS: After physicians committed to a specific diagnosis and treatment plan, investigators performed standardized literature searches and provided the search results to the attending physicians.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary study outcome was the number of patients whose attending physicians would change treatment due to the literature searches. These changes were evaluated by blinded peer review. A secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who received evidence-based treatment before and after the literature searches. Attending physicians changed treatment for 23 (18%) of 130 eligible patients (95% confidence interval, 12% to 24%) as a result of the literature searches. Overall, 86% of patients (112 of 130) received evidence-based treatments before the searches and 87% (113 of 130) after the searches. Changes were not related to whether patients were receiving evidence-based treatment before the search (P=.6). Panels of peer reviewers judged the quality of patient care as improved or maintained for 18 (78%) of the 23 patients with treatment changes.

CONCLUSIONS: Searching the literature could improve the treatment of many medical inpatients, including those already receiving evidence-based treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Forsyth G. An inquiry into the drug bill. Med Care. 1963;1:10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States. The Impact of Randomized Clinical Trials on Health Policy and Medical Practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubinsky M, Ferguson JH. Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare Coverage Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6:480–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. What Proportion of Healthcare Is Evidence Based? Resource Guide. Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/~scharr/ir/percent.html. Accessed July 8, 2003.

  6. Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J, Sackett DL. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. Lancet. 1995;346:407–10.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Michaud G, McGowan JL, van der Jagt R, Wells G, Tugwell P. Are therapeutic decisions supported by evidence from health care research? Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1665–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nordin-Johansson A, Asplund K. Randomized controlled trials and consensus as a basis for interventions in internal medicine. J Intern Med. 2000;247:94–104.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the “evidence” of “evidence-based medicine.” Am J Med. 1997;103:529–35.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Weel C, Knottnerus JA. Evidence-based interventions and comprehensive treatment. Lancet. 1999;353:916–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. It’s about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith CA, Ganschow PS, Reilly BM, et al. Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:710–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reilly B, Lemon M. Evidence-based morning report: a popular new format in a large teaching hospital. Am J Med. 1997;103:419–26.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reilly BM, Hart A, Evans AT. Evidence-based medicine: a passing fancy or the future of primary care? Dis Mon. 1998;44:370–99.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haynes RB. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding the current best evidence. ACP J Club. 2001;134:A11-A13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981:225–33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1986:14–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenhalgh T. “Is my practice evidence-based?” BMJ. 1996;313:957–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guyatt G, Schunemann H, Cook D, Jaeschke R, Pauker S, Bucher H. American College of Chest Physicians. Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents. Chest. 2001;119(1 suppl):3S-7S.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: I. The constraining fundamental paradigms. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:393–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: III. The challenges of comparison and measurement. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:705–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sackett DL. … so little time, and … Evidence-Based Medicine. 1997;2:39.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Del Mar CB, Silagy CA, Glasziou PP, et al. Feasibility of an evidence-based literature search service for general practitioners. MJA. 2001;175:134–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brassey J, Elwyn G, Price C, Kinnersley P. Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project. BMJ. 2001;322:529–30.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart.” JAMA. 1998;280:1336–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guyatt GH, Meade MO, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Haynes RB. Practitioners of evidence based care. BMJ. 2000;320:954–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioners’ perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:361–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tomlin Z, Humphrey C, Rogers S. General practitioners’ perceptions of effective health care. BMJ. 1999;318:1532–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County and Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill

    Brian P. Lucas MD, Arthur T. Evans MD, MPH, Brendan M. Reilly MD, Yuri V. Khodakov MD, Kalyani Perumal MD, Louis G. Rohr MD, Joseph A. Akamah MD, Tunji M. Alausa MD, Christopher A. Smith MD & Jeremy P. Smith MD

Authors
  1. Brian P. Lucas MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arthur T. Evans MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brendan M. Reilly MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuri V. Khodakov MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kalyani Perumal MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Louis G. Rohr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Joseph A. Akamah MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tunji M. Alausa MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christopher A. Smith MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jeremy P. Smith MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Lucas MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucas, B.P., Evans, A.T., Reilly, B.M. et al. The impact of evidence on physicians’ inpatient treatment decisions. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 402–409 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30306.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30306.x

Key words

  • evidence-based medicine
  • practice of medicine
  • treatment decisions