Skip to main content
Log in

Recognition of patient referral desires in an academic managed care plan

Frequency, determinants, and outcomes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and determinants of provider nonrecognition of patients’ desires for specialist referral.

DESIGN: Prospective study.

SETTING: Internal medicine clinic in an academic medical center providing primary care to patients enrolled in a managed care plan.

PARTICIPANTS: Twelve faculty internists serving as primary care providers (PCPs) for 856 patient visits.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were given previsit and postvisit questionnaires asking about referral desire and visit satisfaction. Providers, blinded to patients’ referral desire, were asked after the visit whether a referral was discussed, who initiated the referral discussion, and whether the referral was indicated. Providers failed to discuss referral with 27% of patients who indicated a definite desire for referral and with 56% of patients, who indicated a possible desire for referral. There was significant variability in provider recognition of patient referral desire. Recognition is defined as the provider indicating that a referral was discussed when the patient marked a definite or possible desire for referral. Provider recognition improved significantly (P<.05), when the patient had more than one referral desire, if the patient or a family member was a health care worker and when the patient noted a definite desire versus a possible desire for referral. Patients were more likely (P<.05) to initiate a referral discussion when they had seen the PCP previously and had more than one referral desire. Of patient-initiated referral requests, 14% were considered “not indicated” by PCPs. Satisfaction with care did not differ in patients with a referral desire that were referred and those that were nor referred.

CONCLUSIONS: These PCPs frequently failed to explicitly recognize patients’ referral desires. Patients were more likely to initiate discussions of a referral desire when they saw their usual PCP and had more than a single referral desire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franks P, Clancy CM, Nutting PA. Gatekeeping revisited-protecting patients from overtreatment. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:424–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Forrest CB, Starfield B. The effect of first-contact with primary care clinicians on ambulatory health expenditures. J Fam Pract. 1996;43:40–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin DP, Diehr P, Price KF, Richardson WC. Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1628–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glenn JK, Lawler FK, Hoerl MS. Physician referrals in a competitive environment: an estimate of the economic impact of a referral. JAMA. 1987;258:1920–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenfield S, Nelson E, Zubkoff M. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992;267:1624–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donohoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies, deficiencies and excesses. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb S, Lloyd M. Prescribing and referral in general practice: a study of patients’ expectations and doctors’ actions. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:165–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kravitz RL, Cope DW, Bhrany V, Leake B. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hornberger J, Thom D, MaCurdy T. Effects of a self-administered pre-visit questionnaire to enhance awarencess of patients’ concerns in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:597–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Azari R, Antonius D, Lewis CE. Assessing patients’ expectations in ambulatory medical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marple RL, Kroenke K, Lucey CR, Wilder J, Lucas CA. Concerns and expectations in patients presenting with physical complaints. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1482–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tabenkin H, Revital G, Brammli S, Shvartzman P. Views of direct access to specialists. JAMA. 1998;279:1943–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthal TC, Riemenschneider TA, Feather J. Preserving the patient referral process in the managed care environment. Am J Med. 1996;100:338–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borowsky SJ. What do we really need to know about consultation and referral? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:497–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paternitic D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE. Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:730–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerr EA, Hays RD, Lee ML, Siu AL. Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a health plan? J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:77. Abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher TH, Lo B, Chesney M, Christensen K. How do physicians respond to patients’ requests for costly, unindicated services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:663–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feldman DS, Novack DH, Gracely E. Effects of managed care on physician-patient relationships, quality of care and the ethical practice of medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1626–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McLeod P, Tamblyn R, Gayton D, et al. Use of standardized patients to assess between physician variation in resource utilization. JAMA. 1997;278:1164–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Calman NS, Hyman RB, Hecht W. Variability in consultation rates and practitioner level of diagnostic certainty. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:31–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Franks P, Clancy CM. Referrals of adult patients from primary care: demographic disparities and their relationship to HMO insurance. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:47–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Albertson G, Lin CT, Swaney R, Anderson S, Anderson RJ. Patient-provider interactions in the subspecialty referral process in a gatekeeper model academic managed care plan. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(suppl):103. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail A. Albertson MD.

Additional information

This work was funded by University Hospital Board of Directors, Denver, Colo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albertson, G.A., Lin, C.T., Kutner, J. et al. Recognition of patient referral desires in an academic managed care plan. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 242–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.02208.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.02208.x

Key words

Navigation