Abstract
The nasolacrimal canal is placed at the anterior part of the inferior lateral wall of the orbit and opens to the inferior nasal meatus. The canal can be obstructed by acquired diseases such as dacryocystitis and post-traumatic epiphora due to nasoorbitoethmoidal fractures. Furthermore in nasolacrimal canal obstructions, dacryocystorhinostomy with balloon dilatation is used frequently. In evaluation of the nasolacrimal canal’s acquired diseases, obstruction etiologies and during the reopening of the canal with balloon dilatation, knowing the lacrimal groove’s morphology and morphometry play an important role. The aim of the present study was to evaluate not only the morphological features and types but also the morphometric measurements of lacrimal groove. A total of 60 (30 right, 30 left) adult human dry bone maxillae (both male and female samples) from the collection of the Department of Anatomy of Dokuz Eylül University Medical School were used. Digital compass with 0.01 mm sensitivity was used for measurements. Average length of lacrimal groove was 9.62 ± 2.10 mm. Average width of lacrimal groove was 5.88 ± 1.53 mm at upper one-third, 8.04 ± 2.05 mm at middle one-third, and 5.94 ± 1.28 mm at lower one-third. In 87.7% of cases a crista was observed at the end of the lacrimal groove. Among them, 34.0% were directed to inferior, 54.0% were directed to posterior and 12.0% were horizontal. The present results on the width, length, shape and direction of the lacrimal groove could mediate the etiology of nasolacrimal canal obstructions and could be helpful in surgical approaches and clinical treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becelli R, Renzi G, Mannino G, Cerulli G, Iannetti G (2004) Posttraumatic obstruction of lacrimal pathways: A retrospective analysis of 58 consecutive naso-orbitoethmoid fractures. J Craniofac Surg 15, 29–33.
Beiran I, Pikkel J, Gilboa M, Miller B (1994) Meningitis as a complication of dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 78, 417–18.
Djambazov K, Yovchev I, Baltadjiev G (1999) Anatomotopographic landmarks on the lateral wall of nasal cavity used in endonasal surgery. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 41, 27–32.
Groell R, Schaffler GJ, Uggowitzer M, Szolar DH, Muellner K (1997) CT-anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac and duct. Surg Radiol Anat 19, 189–91.
Haque MR, Hossain MM, Halder KK, Kundu SC, Morshed Z, Chowdhury WA (2004) Outcome of patients treated with the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Mymensingh Med J 13, 157–60.
Hsieh CC, Hung CL, Su CY (2001) Reconstruction of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Chang Gung Med J 24, 361–7.
Hurwitz JJ, Eplett CJ, Fliss D, Freeman JL (1992) Orbital hemorrhage during dacryocystorhinostomy. Can J Ophthalmol 27, 139–42.
Hussein MA, Coats DK, Paysse EA (2003) Migration and apparent disappearance of silicone tube following treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 135, 905–7.
Janssen AG, Mansour K, Bos JJ, Castelijns JA (2001) Diameter of the bony lacrimal canal: Normal values and values related to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Assessment with CT. AJNR 22, 845–50.
Kashkouli MB, Parvaresh M, Modarreszadeh M, Hashemi M, Beigi B (2003) Factors affecting the success of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 22, 247–55.
Kuchar A, Steinkogler FJ (2001) Antegrade balloon dilatation of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults. Br J Ophthalmol 85, 200–4.
Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM (2003) Consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye 17, 691–6.
Massegur H, Trias E, Adema JM (2004) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Modified technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130, 39–46.
Massoud TF, Whittet HB, Anslow P (1993) CT-dacryocystography for nasolacrimal duct obstruction following paranasal sinus surgery. Br J Radiol 66, 223–7.
Mauriello JAJr, Fiore PM, Dacryocystitis KM (1987) Late complication of orbital floor fracture repair with implant. Ophthalmology 94, 248–50.
Moore WM, Bentley CR, Oliver JM (2002) Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology 9, 1575–82.
Osguthorpe JD, Calcaterra TC (1979) Nasolacrimal obstruction after maxillary sinus and rhinoplastic surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 105, 264–6.
Ozturk S, Konuk O, Ilgit ET, Unal M, Erdem (2004) Outcome of patients with nasolacrimal polyurethane stent implantation: Do they keep tearing? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20, 130- 35.
Paulsen F (2003) The human nasolacrimal ducts. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 170, 101–6.
Raut VV, Yung MW, Logan BM (2000) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Anatomical approach. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 121, 53–5.
Serdahl CL, Berris CE, Chole RA(1990) Nasolacrimal duct obstruction after endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 108, 391–2.
Sodhi PK, Ratan SK (2003) Migration and apparent disappearance of silicone tube after treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 136, 966–7.
Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2004) Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20, 50–56.
Unlu HH, Govsa F, Mutlu C, Yuceturk AV, Senyilmaz Y (1997) Anatomical guidelines for intranasal surgery of the lacrimal drainage system. Rhinology 35, 11–15.
Veloudios A, Harvey JT, Philippon M (1991) Long-term placement of silastic nasolacrimal tubes. Ophthalmic Surg 22, 225–57.
Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM et al. (1995). Osteology 5b. Facial bones. In: Gray’s Anatomy (Williams P, Ellis H, Berkowitz BKB, Gray H, Standring S, eds). ELBS with Churchill Livingstone, London, 555–605.
Wormald PJ, Kew J, Hasselt VanA (2000) Intranasal anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123, 307–10.
Yazici Z, Yazici B (2004) When and how nasolacrimal polyurethane stents should be removed? Clin Radiol 59, 538-author reply 539.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ipek, E., Esin, K., Amac, K. et al. Morphological and morphometric evaluation of lacrimal groove. Anato Sci Int 82, 207–210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00185.x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00185.x