Skip to main content
Log in

Large-scale questionnaire survey of erectile dysfunction drugs in Japanese men

  • Original Article
  • Andrology
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 2008

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to investigate the assessment of currently prescribed drugs and approaches to overall erectile dysfunction (ED) therapy.

Methods

A large-scale questionnaire survey was conducted in patients with ED who had taken an ED drug in the past 2 months.

Results

Of the 308 patients surveyed, 23% became aware of having ED more than 3 years ago. In the early stages, the patients frequently experienced ‘anxiety and a sense of loss’ and ‘irritation and powerlessness’. The ED drugs taken were sildenafil and vardenafil in 65 and 31% of the patients, respectively. Although their efficacy was generally high, approximately 80% of the patients (younger patients in particular) experienced some problems with these medications. As negative assessments, the difficulty in finding a good time to take the drug and the strange sensation of the drug forcing the patient to have an erection were pointed out.

Conclusion

Use of an ED drug such as tadalafil, which produces long-lasting effects and allows more spontaneity in sexual activity, will improve ED symptoms in a favorable manner, and will not only improve the self-image of the ED patients, leading to activation and fulfillment of their lives as a whole, but will also enhance the satisfaction and security of their partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirai M. The prevalence of ED in Japan: cross-national epidemiologic study. Jpn J Clin Med 2002; 60: 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med 2007; 120: 151–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shinoyama S, Ishi N, Ishikura F et al. Men’s Health Study: current status of erectile dysfunction of 6112 ambulatory patients at general practitioners’ offices in Japan. J Cardiol 2003; 42: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shabsigh R, Perelman MA, Lockhart DC, Lue TF, Broderick GA. Health issues of men: prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2005; 174: 662–667.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagao K, Ishii N. Attitude survey toward ‘a better sex life’. Med Cons New-Remed 2005; 42: 1227–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haro JM, Beardsworth A, Casariego J et al. Treatment-seeking behavior of erectile dysfunction patients in Europe: results of the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 530–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perelman M, Shabsigh R, Seftel A, Althof S, Lockhart D. Attitudes of men with erectile dysfunction: a cross-national survey. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 397–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shabsigh R, Perelman MA, Laumann EO, Lockhart DC. Drivers and barriers to seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction: a comparison of six countries. BJU Int 2004; 94: 1055–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolosi A, Moreira ED Jr, Villa M, Glasser DB. A population study of the association between sexual function, sexual satisfaction and depressive symptoms in men. J Affective Disord 2004; 82: 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagao K. Sexual activity in normal married couples in Japan: investigation by questionnaire. Reprod Med Biol 2007; 6: 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meuleman EJH. Review of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Exp Opin Pharmacother 2003; 4: 2049–2056.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seftel AD. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor differentiation based on selectivity, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy profiles. Clin Cardiol 2004; 27:I14-I19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Govier F, Potempa A-J, Kaufman J, Denne J, Kovalenko P, Ahuja S. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2709–2723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ströberg P, Murphy A, Costigan T. Switching patients with erectile dysfunction from sildenafil citrate to tadalafil: results of a European multicenter, open-label study of patient preference. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2724–2737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Keitz A, Rajfer J, Segal S et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 499–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eardley I, Mirone V, Montorsi F. An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy. BJU Int 2005; 96: 1323–1332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koichi Nagao.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00219.x.

About this article

Cite this article

Nagao, K., Kobayashi, H., Nakajima, K. et al. Large-scale questionnaire survey of erectile dysfunction drugs in Japanese men. Reprod Med Biol 7, 105–114 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00206.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00206.x

Key words

Navigation