Skip to main content
Log in

Antisperm antibodies in infertile men and their correlation with seminal parameters

  • Original Article
  • Infertility Treatment
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Aim

Antisperm antibodies (ASA) in males cause the autoimmune disease ‘immune infertility’. The present study intended to detect the presence of ASA and their incidence in men with unexplained infertility, as well as to evaluate the correlation between the presence of ASA and semen parameter alterations.

Methods

Blood and sperm assessment were collected to carry out a direct and indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test and semen analysis in infertile and fertile men from the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo State University, Sao Paulo.

Results

In the MAR test, 18.18% of infertile men were positive for ASA. In fertile men, no positivity was found. A significant correlation between the presence of ASA with an increased white blood cell count plus a decreased hypoosmotic swelling test result was observed.

Conclusions

The results indicate that ASA are involved in reduced fertility. It is not ASA detectionper se that provides conclusive information about the occurrence of damage to fertility. The correlation between infertility and altered seminal parameters reinforce the ASA participation in this pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landsteiner K. Zur Kenntnis der spezifisch auf blutkörperchen wirkende sera.Zentralbl Bakt 1899;25: 546–549.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metalnikoff S. Études sur la spermotoxine.Ann Inst Pasteur 1900;14: 577–589.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson L. Sperm agglutinins in human semen and blood.Endoc Gynecol Clin 1954: 652–655.

  4. Mazumdar S, Levine AS. Antisperm antibodies: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.Fertil Steril 1998;70: 799–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins JA, Burrows EA, Yeo J, Younglai EV. Frequency and predictive value of antisperm antibodies among infertile couples.Hum Reprod 1993;17: 592–598.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gubin DA, Dmochowski R, Kutten WH. Multivariant analysis of men from infertile couples with and without antisperm antibodies.Am J Reprod Immunol 1998;39: 157–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmound AM, Tuyttens CL, Comhaire FH. Clinical and biological aspects of male immune infertility: a case-controlled study of 86 cases.Andrology 1996;28: 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sinisi AA, Pasquali D, Papparella Aet al. Antisperm antibodies in cryptorchidism before and after surgery.J Urol 1998;160: 1834–1837.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Isitmangil G, Yildirim S, Orhan I, Kadioglu A, Akinci M. A comparison of the sperm mixed-agglutination reaction test with the peroxidase-labelled protein A test for detecting antisperm antibodies in infertile men with varicocele.B J U Int 1999;84: 835–838.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenzi A, Gandini L, Lombardo F, Rago R, Paoli D, Dondero F. Antisperm antibody detection: 2 clinical, biological, and statistical correlation between methods.Am J Reprod Immunol 1997;38: 224–230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarow JP, Sanzone JJ. Risk factors for male partner antisperm antibodies.J Urol 1992;148: 1805–1807.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bronson R. Antisperm antibodies: a critical evaluation and clinical guidelines.J Reprod Immunol 1999;45: 159–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bronson R. Detection of antisperm antibodies: an argument against therapeutic nihilism.Hum Reprod 1999;14: 1671–1673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heimerhorst FM, Finken MJJ, Erwich JJ. Detection assays for antisperm antibodies: what do they test?Hum Reprod 1999;14: 1669–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hjort T. Antisperm antibodies and infertility: an unsolvable question?Hum Reprod 1999;14: 2423–2426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kutteh WH. Do antisperm antibodies bound to spermatozoa alter normal reproductive function?Hum Reprod 1999;14: 2426–2429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Will WCC, Lawrence WC. Clinical associations and mechanism of action of antisperm antibodies.Fertil Steril 2004;83: 529–535.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bohring C, Krause W. Immune infertility: towards a better understanding of sperm (auto)-immunity.Hum Reprod 2003;18: 915–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bohring C, Krause W. The role of antisperm antibodies during fertilization and for immunological infertility.Chem Immunol Allergy 2005;88: 15–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization.WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Australia: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril 1986;46: 1118–1123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coombs RRA, Rumke P, Edwards RG. Immunoglobulin classes reactive with spermatozoa in the serum and seminal plasma of vasectomized and infertile men. In: Bratanov K, Vulchanov VD, Georgieva T, Somlev B, eds.Immunology of Reproduction. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy Sciences, 1973; 354.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zar JH.Biostatistician Analysis, 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkeback NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past years.Br Med J 1992;305: 609–613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L. Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.Environ Health Perspect 1997;105: 1228–1232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Induslki JA, Sitarek K. Environmental factors which impair male fertility.Med Pr 1997;48: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wyrobek AJ, Schrader SM, Perreault SDet al. Assessment of reproductive disorders and bird defects in communities near hazardous chemical sites. III. Guidelines for field studies of male reproductive disorders.Reprod Toxicol 1997;11: 243–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Celis R, Feria-Velasco A, Gonzalez-Uzanga M, Torres-Calleja J, Pedrón-Nuevo N. Semen quality of workers occupationally exposed to hydrocarbons.Fertil Steril 2000;73: 221–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira OCM, Coneglian-Marise MSP, Gerardin DCC. Effects of neonatal domiphene citrate on fertility and sexual behavior in male rats.Comp Biochem Physiol 2003;134: 545–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pereira OCM. Endocrine disrupters and hypothalamic sexual differentiation.Annu Rev Biomed Sci 2003;5: 87–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, DeRosa Cet al. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects on endocrine disrupters: a report of the US EPA-sponsored workshop.Environ Health Perspect 1996;104: 715–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Biazotti MCS, Martinez EZ, Luiz FBet al Influência das características do sêmen sobre os resultados de fertilização ‘in vitro’.J Bras Reprod Assist 2000;4: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hatasaka H. Immunologic factors in fertility.Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43: 830–843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barrat CLR, Dunphy BC, McLeod I, Cooke ID. The poor prognosis value of low to moderate levels of sperm surface-bound antibodies.Hum Reprod 1992;7: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eggert-Kruser W, Neuer A, Clussmann Cet al. Seminal antibodies to human 60Kd heat shock protein (HSP 60) in male partners of subfertile couples.Hum Reprod 2002;17: 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shibahara H, Shiraishi Y, Suziki M. Diagnosis and treatment of immunologically infertile males with antisperm antibodies.Reprod Med Biol 2005;4: 133–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Diekman AB, Norton EJ, Westbrook A, Klotz KL, Naaby-Hansen S, Herr JC. Anti-sperm antibodies from infertile patients and their cognate sperm antigens: a review. Identify between SAGA-1, the H6-3C4 antigen, and CD52.Am J Reprod Immunol 2000;43: 134–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cookson MS, Witt MA, Kimball KT, Grantmyre JE, Lipshultz LI. Can semen analysis predict the presence of antisperm antibodies in patients with primary infertility?World J Ural 1995;13: 318–322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rossato M, Galeazzi C, Ferigo M, Foresta C. Antisperm antibodies modify plasma membrane functional integrity and inhibit osmosensitive calcium influx in human sperm.Hum Reprod 2004;19: 1816–1820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Comhaire F, Vermeulen L. Human semen analysis.Hum Reprod 1995;1: 343–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oduvaldo C. M. Pereira.

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, P.C., Rubio, E.M. & Pereira, O.C.M. Antisperm antibodies in infertile men and their correlation with seminal parameters. Reprod Med Biol 6, 33–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00162.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00162.x

Key words

Navigation