Human Cell

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 31–37 | Cite as

Donor age-dependent acceleration of cellular aging by repeated ultraviolet A irradiation of human dermal fibroblasts derived from a single donor

  • Eiji Naru
  • Toshiro Ohta
  • Ken Inomata
  • Akinobu Hayashi
  • Kazuhiko Kaji
Research Article


The relationship between cellular aging and aging of entire organisms has been studied extensively. The findings are confusing, however, and no clear relationships have been demonstrated. The conflicting data may be due to individual differences among the donors of the studied cells. It is crucial to identify the changes in cellular properties that are the result of the aging process. Here, we used human dermal fibroblast cell lines established from a single donor at different ages to assess the influence of ultraviolet A (UVA) on cellular aging. These cell lines have the same genetic background and were obtained from a restricted body region. The results indicated that cellular aging was accelerated by UVA irradiation in a donor age-dependent manner. The ratio of lifespan shortening increased with donor age. Increased donor age not only decreased cell division, but also increased the growth arrest response to UVA irradiation. The characteristics of the cultured cells reflected the age-related changes in dermal fibroblasts.

Key words

donor age fibroblast in vitro aging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lavker RM. Structural alterations in exposed and unexposed aged skin. J Invest Dermatol 1979; 73: 59–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lavker RM, Kwong F, Kligman AM. Changes in skin surface patterns with age. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 348–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bissett DL, Hannon DP, Orr TV. An animal model of solar-aged skin: histological, physical, and visible changes in UV-irradiated hairless mouse skin. Photochem Photobiol 1987; 46: 367–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bissett DL, Hillebrand GG, Hannon DP. The hairless mouse as a model of skin photoaging: its use to evaluate photoprotective materials. Photodermatol 1989; 6: 228–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kligman LH. Photoaging, manifestations, prevention, and treatment. Dermatol Clin 1986; 4: 517–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res 1965; 37: 614–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schneider EL, Mitsui Y. The relationship between in vitro cellular aging and in vivo human age. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976; 73: 3584–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Röhme D. Evidence for a relationship between longevity of mammalian species and life spans of normal fibroblasts in vitro and erythrocytes in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 5009–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbara A, Gilchrest MD. Prior chronic sun exposure decreases the lifespan of human skin fibroblasts in vitro. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldstein S. Lifespan of cultured cells in progeria. Lancet 1969; 1: 424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salk D. Werner’s syndrome: a review of recent research with an analysis of connective tissue metabolism, growth control of cultured cells, and chromosomal aberrations. Hum Gene 1982; 62: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cristofalo VJ, Allen RG, Pignolo RJ et al. Relationship between donor age and the replicative lifespan of human cells in culture: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 10614–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moule AJ, Li H, Bartold PM. Donor variability in the proliferation of human dental pulp fibroblasts. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 110–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith JR, Venable S, Roberts TW et al. Relationship between in vivo age and in vitro aging: assessment of 669 cell cultures derived from members of the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: B239–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doggett DL, Rotenberg MO, Pignolo RJ et al. Differential gene expression between young and senescent, quiescent WI-38 cells. Mech Ageing Dev 1992; 65: 239–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pignolo RJ, Cristofalo VJ, Rotenberg MO. Senescent WI-38 cells fail to express EPC-1, a gene induced in young cells upon entry into the G0 state. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 8949–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brinckmann J, Açil Y, Wolff HH et al. Collagen synthesis in (sun-) aged human skin and in fibroblasts derived from sun-exposed and sun-protected body sites. J Photochem Photobiol B 1995; 27: 33–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rudolph R, Vande Berg J. Fibroblast variability in photoaged and nonphotoaged facelift skin. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40: 135–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birket MJ, Birch-Machin MA. Ultraviolet radiation exposure accelerates the accumulation of the aging-dependent T414G mitochondrial DNA mutation in human skin. Aging Cell 2007; 6: 557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisher GJ, Datta SC, Talwar HS et al. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature skin ageing and retinoid antagonism. Nature 1996; 379: 335–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fisher GJ, Wang ZQ, Datta SC et al. Pathophysiology of premature skin aging induced by ultraviolet light. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1419–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chung JH, Seo JY, Choi HR et al. Modulation of skin collagen metabolism in aged and photoaged human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117: 1218–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varani J, Spearman D, Perone P et al. Inhibition of type I procollagen synthesis by damaged collagen in photoaged skin and by collagenase-degraded collagen in vitro. Am J Pathol 2001; 158: 931–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Varani J, Schuger L, Dame MK et al. Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 122: 1471–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varani J, Dame MK, Rittie L et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin: roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol 2006; 168: 1861–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaji K. The study of cellular aging. Biomed Gerontol 2001; 25: 3–4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Naru E, Suzuki T, Moriyama M et al. Functional changes induced by chronic UVA irradiation to cultured human dermal fibroblasts. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153 (Suppl 2): 6–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poulios E, Trougakos IP, Chondrogianni N et al. Exposure of human diploid fibroblasts to hypoxia extends proliferative life span. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007; 1119: 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen Q, Ames BN. Senescence-like growth arrest induced by hydrogen peroxide in human diploid fibroblast F65 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 4130–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Herrmann G, Brenneisen P, Wlaschek M et al. Psoralen photoactivation promotes morphological and functional changes in fibroblasts in vitro reminiscent of cellular senescence. J Cell Sci 1998; 111: 759–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Honda S, Hjelmeland LM, Handa JT. Oxidative stress-induced single-strand breaks in chromosomal telomeres of human retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 2139–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frippiat C, Chen QM, Zdanov S et al. Subcytotoxic H2O2 stress triggers a release of transforming growth factor-β1, which induces biomarkers of cellular senescence of human diploid fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 2531–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Unterluggauer H, Hampel B, Zwerschke W et al. Senescence-associated cell death of human endothelial cells: the role of oxidative stress. Exp Gerontol 2003; 38: 1149–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Debacq-Chainiaux F, Borlon C, Pascal T et al. Repeated exposure of human skin fibroblasts to UVB at subcytotoxic level triggers premature senescence through the TGF-β1 signaling pathway. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 743–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giangreco A, Qin M, Pintar JE et al. Epidermal stem cells are retained in vivo throughout skin aging. Aging Cell 2008; 7: 250–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nishimura EK, Granter SR, Fisher DE. Mechanisms of hair graying: incomplete melanocyte stem cell maintenance in the niche. Science 2005; 307: 720–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toma JG, Akhavan M, Fernandes KJ et al. Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3: 778–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ohtani N, Yamakoshi K, Takahashi A et al. The p16INK4a-RB pathway: molecular link between cellular senescence and tumor suppression. J Med Invest 2004; 51: 146–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Takahashi A, Ohtani N, Yamakoshi K et al. Mitogenic signalling and the p16INK4a-Rb pathway cooperate to enforce irreversible cellular senescence. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8: 1291–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ressler S, Bartkova J, Niederegger H et al. p16INK4A is a robust in vivo biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. Aging Cell 2006; 5: 379–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society and Springer Japan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eiji Naru
    • 1
  • Toshiro Ohta
    • 2
  • Ken Inomata
    • 1
  • Akinobu Hayashi
    • 1
  • Kazuhiko Kaji
    • 2
  1. 1.Research and Development DivisionKOSÉ CorporationTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology of Aging, Graduate School of Nutritional and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ShizuokaShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations