BACKGROUND: Clinical experience, features of data collection process, or both, affect diagnostic accuracy, but their respective role is unclear.
OBJECTIVE, DESIGN: Prospective, observational study, to determine the respective contribution of clinical experience and data collection features to diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: Six Internists, 6 second year internal medicine residents, and 6 senior medical students worked up the same 7 cases with a standardized patient. Each encounter was audiotaped and immediately assessed by the subjects who indicated the reasons underlying their data collection. We analyzed the encounters according to diagnostic accuracy, information collected, organ systems explored, diagnoses evaluated, and final decisions made, and we determined predictors of diagnostic accuracy by logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Several features significantly predicted diagnostic accuracy after correction for clinical experience: early exploration of correct diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 24.35) or of relevant diagnostic hypotheses (OR 2.22) to frame clinical data collection, larger number of diagnostic hypotheses evaluated (OR 1.08), and collection of relevant clinical data (OR 1.19).
CONCLUSION: Some features of data collection and interpretation are related to diagnostic accuracy beyond clinical experience and should be explicitly included in clinical training and modeled by clinical teachers. Thoroughness in data collection should not be considered a privileged way to diagnostic success.
clinical reasoning clinical data collection experience expertise medical education internal medicine
Norman GR, Brooks LR, Cunnington JPW, Shali V, Marriott M, Regehr G. Expert-novice differences in the use of history and visual information from patients. Acad Med. 1996;71:62–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks LR, LeBlanc VR, Norman GR. On the difficulty of noticing obvious features in patient appearance. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:112–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblanc VR, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Believing is seeing: the influence of a diagnostic hypothesis on the interpretation of clinical features. Acad Med. 2002;77:S67-S69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblanc VR, Norman GR, Brooks LR. Effect of a diagnostic suggestion on diagnostic accuracy and identification of clinical features. Acad Med. 2001;76:S18-S20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrows HS, Norman GR, Neufeld VR, Feightner JW. The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clin Invest Med. 1982;5:49–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Neufeld VR, Norman GR, Barrows HS, Feightner JW. Clinical problem-solving by medical students: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Med Educ. 1981;15:315–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasnain M, Bordage G, Connell KJ, Sinacore JM. History-taking behaviors associated with diagnostic competence of clerks: an exploratory study. Acad Med. 2001;76:S14-S17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nendaz MR, Gut AM, Perrier A, et al. Common strategies in clinical data collection displayed by experienced clinician-teachers in internal medicine. Med Teach. 2005;27:415–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med. 1999;74:S138-S143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman GR, Barrows HS, Feightner JW, Neufeld VR. Measuring the outcome of clinical problem-solving. Ann Conf Res Med Educ. 1977;16:311–6.Google Scholar
Charlin B, Desaulniers M, Gagnon R, Blouin D, van der Vleuten C. Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:150–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nendaz MR, Gut AM, Perrier A, et al. Degree of concurrency among experts in data collection and diagnostic hypothesis generation during clinical encounters. Med Educ. 2004;38:25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norcini J, Shea J, Day S. The use of the aggregate scoring for a recertification examination. Eval Health Prof. 1990;13:241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nendaz M, Raetzo M, Junod A, Vu. Teaching diagnostic skills: clinical vignettes or chief complaints? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000;5:3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar