Importance of adult literacy in understanding health disparities
- 167 Downloads
BACKGROUND: In several recent studies, the importance of education and race in explaining health-related disparities has diminished when literacy was considered. This relationship has not been tested in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the effect of adult literacy on the explanatory power of education and race in predicting health status among U.S. adults.
DESIGN: Using the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey, logistic regression models predicting health status were estimated with and without literacy to test the effect of literacy inclusion on race and education.
SUBJECTS: A nationally representative sample of 23,889 noninstitutionalized U.S. adults.
MEASURES: Poor health status was measured by having a work-impairing condition or a long-term illness. Literacy was measured by an extensive functional skills test.
RESULTS: When literacy was not considered, African Americans were 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.84) times more likely to have a work-impairing condition than whites, and completion of an additional level of education made one 0.75 (0.69 to 0.82) times as likely to have a work-impairing condition. When literacy was considered, the effect estimates of both African-American race and education diminished 32% to the point that they were no longer significantly associated with having a work-impairing condition. Similar results were seen with long-term illness.
CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of adult literacy reduces the explanatory power of crucial variables in health disparities research. Literacy inequity may be an important factor in health disparities, and a powerful avenue for alleviation efforts, which has been mistakenly attributed to other factors.
Key wordsdisparities education race/ethnicity literacy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Introduction and literature review. In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003:29–79.Google Scholar
- 9.Kirsch IS, Yamomoto Y, Norris N, et al. Technical Report and Data File User’s Manual for the 1992 Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics; 2000. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001457.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2002.Google Scholar
- 10.Reder S. Dimensionality and construct validity of the NALS assessment. In: Smith CB, ed. Literacy for the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 1998:37–57.Google Scholar
- 11.Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education; 1993.Google Scholar
- 12.Stata Corporation. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 1999.Google Scholar
- 13.Agreshi A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1990.Google Scholar
- 15.Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Sudano J, Patterson M. The association between age and health literacy among elderly persons. J Gerontol. 2000;55B:S368-S374.Google Scholar
- 21.Greenberg D. A critical look at health literacy. Adult Basic Educ. 2001;11:67–79.Google Scholar