Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1105–1108 | Cite as

Brief Report: Lack of a race effect in primary care ratings among women veterans

  • Bevanne Bean-Mayberry
  • Chung-Chou Chang
  • Sarah Hudson Scholle
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of race on primary care quality and satisfaction among women in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

METHODS: We used a mail survey to measure primary care quality and satisfaction. We focused on 4 primary care domains: patient preference for provider, interpersonal communication, accumulated knowledge, and coordination. We performed univariate analyses to compare variables by race and multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the effect of race on the probability of reporting a perfect score on each domain, while adjusting for patient characteristics and site.

RESULTS: Black women were younger, unmarried, educated, of higher income, and reported female providers and gynecological care in VA more often. In regression analysis, race was not significantly associated with any primary care domain or satisfaction. Gynecological care from VA provider was associated with perfect ratings on patient preference for provider (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.3, 3.1), and satisfaction (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3), while female provider was associated with interpersonal communication (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4, 2.6).

CONCLUSIONS: While demographics and health experiences vary by race among veterans, race had no effect on primary care ratings. Future studies need to determine whether this racial equity persists in health outcomes among women veterans.

Key words

patient satisfaction primary care race veterans women 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Veterans Affairs, Fact Sheet. June 2005. Available at: http://wwwl.va.gov/opa/fact/vafacts.html. Accessed September 15, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    US General Accounting Office. VA Health Care for Women: Progress Made in Providing Services to Women Veterans. GAO-HEHS-99-38. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stern A, Wolfe J, Daley J, Zaslavsky A, Folsom S, Wilson K. Changing demographic characteristics of women veterans: results from a national sample. Milit Med. 2000;165:773–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Available at: http://defenselink.mil/pubs/almanac/. Accessed on January 31, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2218–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jha AK, Perlin JB, Steinman MA, Peabody JW, Ayanian JZ. Quality of ambulatory care for women and men in the Veterans affairs health care system. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:762–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang CH, McNeil MA, Whittle JC, Hayes PM, Scholle SH. Patient satisfaction in women’s clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:175–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright SM, Craig T, Campbell S, Schaefer J, Humble C. Patient satisfaction of female and male users of Veterans Health Administration services. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bosworth HS, Parsey KS, Butterfield MI, et al. Racial variation in wanting and obtaining mental health services among women veterans in a primary care clinic. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dillman DA. The design and administration of mail surveys. Ann Rev Sociol. 1991;17:225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flocke SA. Measuring attributes of primary care: development of a new instrument. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:64–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ. The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services. Med Care. 1998;36S:AS21-AS30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Performance Data Feedback Center and Office of Quality and Performance. 1999 National Survey Report. Performance on Customer Service Standards: Ambulatory Care. Washington, DC: Veterans Administration; 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haviland MG, Morales LS, Dial TH, Pincus HA. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and satisfaction with health care. Am J Med Quality. 2005;20:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lurie N, Zhan C, Sangl J, Bierman AS, Sekscenski ES. Variation in racial and ethnic differences in consumer assessments of health care. Am J Managed Care. 2003;9:502–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weech-Moldanado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Marshall G, Hays RD. Race/ethnicity, language, and patient’s assessment of care in medicaid managed care. Health Ser Res. 2003;38:789–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Guadagnoli E, et al. Patients’ perceptions of quality of care for colorectal cancer by race, ethnicity, and language. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6452–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roter DL, Hall JA. Why physician gender matters in shaping the physician-patient relationship. J Womens Health. 1998;7:1093–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender affects medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bean-Mayberry B, Chang C, McNeil M, Hayes P, Scholle SH. Comprehensive care for women veterans: indicators of dual use of VA and non-VA providers. JAMWA. 2004;59:192–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bevanne Bean-Mayberry
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chung-Chou Chang
    • 2
  • Sarah Hudson Scholle
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Health Equity, Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (151C-U)University Drive CPittsburgh
  2. 2.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and ManagementUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  5. 5.Research and Analysis DivisionNational Committee for Quality AssuranceWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations