OBJECTIVE: There is no proven primary care treatment for patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). We hypothesized that a long-term, multidimensional intervention by primary care providers would improve MUS patients’ mental health.
DESIGN: Clinical trial.
SETTING: HMO in Lansing, MI.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients from 18 to 65 years old with 2 consecutive years of high utilization were identified as having MUS by a reliable chart rating procedure; 206 subjects were randomized and 200 completed the study.
INTERVENTION: From May 2000 to January 2003, 4 primary care clinicians deployed a 12-month intervention consisting of cognitive-behavioral, pharmacological, and other treatment modalities. A behaviorally defined patient-centered method was used by clinicians to facilitate this treatment and the provider-patient relationship.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was an improvement from baseline to 12 months of 4 or more points on the Mental Component Summary of the SF-36.
RESULTS: Two hundred patients averaged 13.6 visits for the year preceding study. The average age was 47.7 years and 79.1% were females. Using intent to treat, 48 treatment and 34 control patients improved (odds ratio [OR]=1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08 to 3.40; P=.02). The relative benefit (relative “risk” for improving) was 1.47 (CI: 1.05 to 2.07), and the number needed to treat was 6.4 (95% CI: 0.89 to 11.89). The following baseline measures predicted improvement: severe mental dysfunction (P<.001), severe body pain (P=.039), nonsevere physical dysfunction (P=.003), and at least 16 years of education (P=.022); c-statistic=0.75.
CONCLUSION: The first multidimensional intervention by primary care clinicians led to clinically significant improvement in MUS patients.
medically unexplained symptoms somatization mental health in primary care provider-patient relationship satisfaction patient-centered
deGruy F, Columbia L, Dickinson P. Somatization disorder in a family practice. J Fam Pract. 1987;25:45–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
Smith RC, Gardiner JC, Lyles JS, et al. Exploration of DSM-IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:123–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar JI, Waitzkin H, Silver RC, Gara M, Holman A. Abridged somatization: a study in primary care. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:466–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bridges KW, Goldberg DP. Somatic presentation of DSM III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:563–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith RC, Lein C, Collins C, et al. Treating patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:478–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyles JS, Hodges A, Collins C, et al. Using nurse practitioners to implement an intervention in primary care for high utilizing patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:63–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith RC, Korban E, Kanj M, et al. A method for rating charts to identify and classify patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychother Psychosom. 2004;73:36–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.Google Scholar
Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. Br Med J. 2002;324:819–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith RC. Patient-Centered Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Method. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.Google Scholar
Sharpe M. Cognitive behavioural therapies in the treatment of functional somatic symptoms. In: Mayou R, Bass C, Sharpe M, eds. Treatment of Functional Somatic Symptoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995:122–43.Google Scholar
Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care—the PRIME-MD Study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith RC, Lyles JS, Mettler J, et al. The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:118–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression—a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;46:1109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorius N. Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)—Core Version 1.1. Copyright World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Ware JJE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey—Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.Google Scholar
Von Korff M, Ustun TB, Ormel J, Kaplan I, Simon GE. Self-report disability in an international primary care study of psychological illness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibnall J, Tait R. The Psychosomatic Symptom Checklist revisited: reliability and validity in a chronic pain population. J Behav Med. 1989;12:297–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith RC, Lyles JS, Mettler JA, et al. A strategy for improving patient satisfaction by the intensive training of residents in psychosocial medicine: a controlled, randomized study. Acad Med. 1995;70:729–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar JI, Swartz M, Rubio-Stipec M, Manu P. Medically unexplained symptoms: distribution, risk factors, and comorbidity. In: Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM, eds. Current Concepts of Somatization: Research and Clinical Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc; 1991:63–78.Google Scholar
Hall JA, Roter DL, Milburn MA. Illness and satisfaction with medical care. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1999;8:96–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance GW, Siegel JE, Luce BR. Framing and designing the cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996:54–81.Google Scholar
Lin E, Katon W, Simon G, et al. Achieving guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary care: is physician education enough? Med Care. 1997;35:831–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroenke K. The interface between physical and psychological symptoms. Primary Care Companion. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;5(Suppl 7):11–8.Google Scholar
Henningsen P, Zimmermann T, Sattel H. Medically unexplained physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analytic review. Psychosom Med. 2003;65:528–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar JI, Gara M, Silver RC, Waitzkin G, Holman A, Compton W. Somatisation disorder in primary care. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173:262–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar