Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 486–489 | Cite as

Brief report: Multiprogram evaluation of reading habits of primary care internal medicine residents on ambulatory rotations

  • Cindy J. Lai
  • Eva Aagaard
  • Suzanne Brandenburg
  • Mohan Nadkarni
  • Henry G. Wei
  • Robert Baron
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reading habits and educational resources of primary care internal medicine residents for their ambulatory medicine education.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multiprogram survey of primary care internal medicine residents.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Second- and third-year residents on ambulatory care rotations at 9 primary care medicine programs (124 eligible residents; 71% response rate).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants were asked open-ended and 5-point Likert-scaled questions about reading habits: time spent reading, preferred resources, and motivating and inhibiting factors. Participants reported reading medical topics for a mean of 4.3±3.0 SD hours weekly. Online-only sources were the most frequently utilized medical resource (mean Likert response 4.16±0.87). Respondents most commonly cited specific patients’ cases (4.38±0.65) and preparation for talks (4.08±0.89) as motivating factors, and family responsibilities (3.99±0.65) and lack of motivation (3.93±0.81) as inhibiting factors.

CONCLUSIONS: To stimulate residents’ reading, residency programs should encourage patient- and case-based learning; require teaching assignments; and provide easy access to online curricula.

Key words

reading habits ambulatory medicine graduate medical education internal medicine residency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. 1996;313:1062–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nylenna M, Aasland OG. Primary care physicians and their information-seeking behaviour. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000;18:9–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mann KV, Chaytor KM. Help! Is anyone listening? An assessment of learning needs of practicing physicians. Acad Med. 1992;67(suppl):S4–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choudhry N, Fletcher R, Soumerai S. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:260–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans CE, Haynes RB, Gilbert JR, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, Johnston M. Educational package on hypertension for primary care physicians. Can Med Assoc J. 1984;130:719–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:596–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norcini JJ, Lipner RS, Benson JA. An analysis of the knowledge base of practicing internists as measured by the 1980 recertification examination. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:385–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS. Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. JAMA. 1991;266:1103–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGlynn TJ, Wynn JB, Munzenrider RF. Resident education in primary care: how residents learn. J Med Educ. 1978;53:973–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    White JA, Anderson P. Learning by internal medicine residents: differences and similarities of perceptions by residents and faculty. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:126–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson KH, Dayrit M, Bazargan M. The reading habits of family practice residents. Fam Med. 1997;29:488–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fafard J, Snell L. Reading habits of house-staff: what, where and why. Med Teach. 1989;11:279–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnard A, Kamien M. The reading habits of RACGP training program doctors. Aust Fam Physician. 1994;23:1752–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Piterman L. GPs as learners. Med J Aust. 1991;155:318–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oddone E, Guarisco S, Simel D. Comparison of housestaff’s estimates of their workday activities with results of a random work-sampling study. Acad Med. 1993;68:859–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy J. Lai
    • 4
  • Eva Aagaard
    • 4
  • Suzanne Brandenburg
    • 1
  • Mohan Nadkarni
    • 2
  • Henry G. Wei
    • 3
  • Robert Baron
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Colorado Health Sciences CenterDenverUSA
  2. 2.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Cornell University Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations