A clinician-educator’s roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests

  • Donna M. Windish
  • Marie Diener-West


As educators seek confirmation of successful trainee achievement, medical education must move toward a more evidence-based approach to teaching and evaluation. Although medical training often provides physicians with a general background in biostatistics, many are not prepared to apply these skills. This can hinder clinician educators as they wish to develop, analyze and disseminate their scholarly work. This paper is intended to be a concise educational tool and guide for choosing and interpreting statistical tests aimed toward medical education assessment. It includes guidelines and examples that clinician-educators can use when analyzing and interpreting studies and when writing methods and results sections of reports.

Key words

medical education educational research statistics faculty development 


  1. 1.
    Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Available at http://www.lcme.org. Accessed December 1, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. General Competencies: minimum program requirements language. Available at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/comp-Min.asp. Accessed December 1, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen FM, Bauchner H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004;79:955–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dauphinee WD, Wood-Dauphinee S. The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79:925–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinsteing MC. When doctors meet numbers. Am J Med. 1981;71:991–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wulff HR, Andersen B, Brandenhoff P, Guttler F. What do doctors know about statistics? Stat Med. 1987;6:3–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lurie SJ. Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. JAMA. 2003;290:1210–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology. Applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. JAMA. 2004;292:1044–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartman JM, Forsen JW, Wallace MS, Neely JG. Tutorials in clinical research: part VI. Recognizing and controlling bias. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:23–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riegelman RK. Studying a Study and Testing a Test. How to Read the Medical Evidence. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siegel S, Castellan Jr. NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1988.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz MH. Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of medical research. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:644–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna M. Windish
    • 1
  • Marie Diener-West
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiostatisticsThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Yale Primary Care Residency ProgramWaterbury

Personalised recommendations