How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine … and other journals
Like all peer-reviewed journals, JGIM depends on your participation. If you have not volunteered already, register online at the Journal website to be considered for the JGIM reviewer database. Although the literature on this subject is limited, peer review is the best system we have currently for improving manuscript and journal quality. Peer review needs everyone’s participation to be valuable and viable. A well-done review is beneficial to the reviewer, Editor, and author. When preparing your review, we encourage you to keep the concepts outlined above in mind, as well as reviewing the annotated samples of good reviews available in the online version of this Editorial.
- 13.The Editors. Distinguished reviewers. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20 (1199).Google Scholar
- 15.World Association of Medical Editors A Syllabus for Prospective and Newly Appointed Editors. Available at: http://www.wame.org/syllabus.htm#reviewers. Accessed September 25, 2005.Google Scholar
- 17.Training package for BMJ peer reviewers. British Medical Journal. Available at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/advice/peer_review. Accessed September 25, 2005.Google Scholar
- 18.Educational Resources. An Instructional Guide for Peer-Reviewers of Biomedical Manuscripts. Annals of Emergency Medicine. Available at: http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymem/content/emoptions. Accessed September 17, 2005.Google Scholar
- 27.Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND). Available at: http://www.trend-statement.org/asp/trend.asp. Accessed November 11, 2005.Google Scholar