Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 1108–1113 | Cite as

Teaching medical students the important connection between communication and clinical reasoning

  • Donna M. Windish
  • Eboni G. Price
  • Sarah L. Clever
  • Jeffrey L. Magaziner
  • Patricia A. Thomas
Original Articles

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical students are rarely taught how to integrate communication and clinical reasoning. Not understanding the relation between these skills may lead students to undervalue the connection between psychosocial and biomedical aspects of patient care.

OBJECTIVE: To improve medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning and their appreciation of how these skills interrelate in medical practice.

DESIGN: In 2003, we conducted a randomized trial of a curricular intervention at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. In a 6-week course, participants learned communication and clinical reasoning skills in an integrative fashion using small group exercises with role-play, reflection and feedback through a structured iterative reflective process.

PARTICIPANTS: Second-year medical students.

MEASUREMENTS: All students interviewed standardized patients who evaluated their communication skills in establishing rapport, data gathering and patient education/counseling on a 5-point scale (1=poor; 5=excellent). We assessed clinical reasoning through the number of correct problems listed and differential diagnoses generated and the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory. Students rated the importance of learning these skills in an integrated fashion.

RESULTS: Standardized patients rated curricular students more favorably in establishing rapport (4.1 vs 3.9; P=.05). Curricular participants listed more psychosocial history items on their problem lists (65% of curricular students listing ≥1 item vs 44% of controls; P=.008). Groups did not differ significantly in other communication or clinical reasoning measures. Ninety-five percent of participants rated the integration of these skills as important.

CONCLUSIONS: Intervention students performed better in certain communication and clinical reasoning skills. These students recognized the importance of biomedical and psychosocial issues in patient care. Educators may wish to teach the integration of these skills early in medical training.

Key Words

communication skills clinical reasoning medical education (undergraduate) reflection, feedback 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Learning objectives for medical student education—guidelines for medical schools: report I of the medical school objectives project. January 1998; Available from: http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/. Accessed March 28, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). Functions and structures of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree. July 2003; Available from: http://www.lcme.org/. Accessed July 16, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Outcome project: enhancing residency education through outcomes assessment. Available from: http//www.acgme.org/Outcome/. Accessed March 28, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans RJ, Stanley RO, Mestrovic R, Rose L. Effects of communication skills training on students’ diagnostic efficiency. Med Educ. 1991;25:517–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roter D, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kempainen RR, Migeon MB, Wolf FM. Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2003;25:177–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987;25:437–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levinson W, Roter D. Physicians’ psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Windish DM, Paulman PM, Goroll AH, Bass EB. Do clerkship directors think medical students are prepared for the clerkship years? Acad Med. 2004;79:56–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bird J, Cohen-Cole SA. The three function model of the medical interview. Adv Psychosom Med. 1990;20:65–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keller V, Carroll J. A new model for physician-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 1994;23:131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurtz S, Silverman J. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programs. Med Educ. 1996;30:83–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Makoul G. The SEGUE Framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;23–34.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method (Patient-Centered Case Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Novack DH, Dube C, Goldstein MG. Teaching medical interviewing: a basic course on interviewing and the physician-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1814–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas RE. Teaching medicine with cases: student and teacher opinion. Med Educ. 1992;26:200–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rogers JC, Swee DE, Ullian JA. Teaching medical decision making and students’ clinical problem solving skills. Med Teach. 1991;13:157–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menahem S, Paget N. Role play for the clinical tutor: towards problem-based learning. Med Teach. 1990;12:57–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurtz SM, Silverman JD, Draper J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bordage G, Grant J, Marsden P. Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability. Med Educ. 1990;24:413–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmidt H. Integrating the teaching of basic sciences, clinical sciences, and biopsychosocial issues. Acad Med. 1998;73(suppl):S24–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna M. Windish
    • 1
  • Eboni G. Price
    • 2
  • Sarah L. Clever
    • 3
  • Jeffrey L. Magaziner
    • 3
  • Patricia A. Thomas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineYale Primary Care Residency ProgramNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal Medicine and GeriatricsTulane University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Division of General Internal MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations