Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 837–841 | Cite as

Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing

  • Tejal K. GandhiEmail author
  • Saul N. Weingart
  • Andrew C. Seger
  • Joshua Borus
  • Elisabeth Burdick
  • Eric G. Poon
  • Lucian L. Leape
  • David W. Bates
Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are common among inpatients and many are preventable with computerized prescribing. Relatively little is known about outpatient prescribing errors or the impact of computerized prescribing in this setting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates, types, and severity of outpatient prescribing errors and understand the potential impact of computerized prescribing.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in 4 adult primary care practices in Boston using prescription review, patient survey, and chart review to identify medication errors, potential adverse drug events (ADEs) and preventable ADEs.

PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients over age 18 who received a prescription from 24 participating physicians.

RESULTS: We screened 1879 prescriptions from 1202 patients, and completed 661 surveys (response rate 55%). Of the prescriptions, 143 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4% to 8.8%) contained a prescribing error. Three errors led to preventable ADEs and 62 (43%; 3% of all prescriptions) had potential for patient injury (potential ADEs); I was potentially life-threatening (2%) and 15 were serious (24%). Errors in frequency (n=77, 54%) and dose (n=26, 18%) were common. The rates of medication errors and potential ADEs were not significantly different at basic computerized prescribing sites (4.3% vs 11.0%, P=.31; 2.6% vs 4.0%, P=.16) compared to handwritten sites. Advanced checks (including dose and frequency checking) could have prevented 95% of potential ADEs.

CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing errors occurred in 7.6% of outpatient prescriptions and many could have harmed patients. Basic computerized prescribing systems may not be adequate to reduce errors. More advanced systems with dose and frequency checking are likely needed to prevent potentially harmful errors.

Key Words

medication error electronic prescribing ambulatory care 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bates DW, Boyle DL, Vander Vliet MB, Schneider J, Leape LL. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:199–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N. Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significance. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11:340–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer TA. Improving the quality of the order-writing process for inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57(suppl 4):4–22.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaughnessy AF, Nickel RO. Prescription-writing patterns and errors in a family medicine residency program. J Fam Pract. 1989;29:290–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawksworth GM, Corlett AJ, Wright DJ, Chrystyn H. Clinical pharmacy interventions by community pharmacists during the dispensing process. Br J Clin Pharm. 1999;47:695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rupp MT, DeYoung M, Schondelmeyer SW. Prescribing problems and pharmacist interventions in community practice. Med Care. 1992;30:926–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buurma H, de Smet PAGM, van den Hoff OP, Egberts ACG. Nature, frequency, and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharamacies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:85–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Collins KS, Tenney K, Hughes DL, Audet AJ. Room for improvement: patients report on the quality of their health care. Available at: http://www.cmwf.org. Accessed November 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. New Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bates DW, O’Neil AC, Boyle D, et al. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:404–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rothschild JM, Lee TH, Bae T, Bates DW. Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:223–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bates DW, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lesar TS, Briceland LL, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997;277:312–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IMS Health, National Prescription Audit™ Plus 7/2003, All Channels, July 2002 through June 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Helmreich RL, Merritt AC. Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate; 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schiff GD, Bates DW. Electronic point-of-care-prescribing: writing the “script”. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2000;7:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rabinowitz E. Will palm-size computers make electronic prescribing happen? Manage Care. 1999;8:59–61.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gallup poll. Computerisation in GP practices in England and Wales: 1993 survey. NHS Management Executive 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harris Interactive. Poll: Americans prefer direct prescribing connectivity between physicians, pharmacists. Available at: http://www.surescript.com/aug10.htm. Accessed November 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barrett MJ, Holmes BJ, McAulay SE Forrester Research. Electronic medical records: a buyer’s guide for small physician practices. California HealthCare Foundation 2003. Available at: http://www.chcf.org. Accessed November 1, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tejal K. Gandhi
    • 3
    Email author
  • Saul N. Weingart
    • 1
  • Andrew C. Seger
    • 3
  • Joshua Borus
    • 3
  • Elisabeth Burdick
    • 3
  • Eric G. Poon
    • 3
  • Lucian L. Leape
    • 2
  • David W. Bates
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Patient SafetyDana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Division of General MedicineBrigham and Women’s HospitalBoston

Personalised recommendations