Terrorism’s psychologic effects and their implications for primary care policy, research, and education

  • David P. Eisenman
  • Bradley D. Stein
  • Terri L. Tanielian
  • Harold Alan Pincus
Health Policy

Abstract

This paper examines primary care physicians’ (PCP) roles in helping the nation prepare for, respond to, and recover from the psychologic consequences of chemical, biologic, radiologic, or nuclear (CBRN) terrorism. First, we discuss the psychologic consequences of a CBRN attack and PCPs’ roles in responding to these consequences. Second, we analyze these roles in light of the known barriers to delivering high-quality, primary care-based, mental health care. Third, we offer recommendations for mitigating these barriers and preparing PCPs to respond to the psychosocial consequences of a CBRN weapon. Importantly, our recommendations provide dual-use benefits to PCPs faced with the daily concerns of primary care mental health, including improved linkages and electronic connectivity with mental health, information technology, and decision support for providers, and needed education and research.

Key words

terrorism bioterrorism mental health primary care 

References

  1. 1.
    Barbera J, Macintrye AG. The reality of the modern bioterrorism response. Lancet. 2004;360(1 suppl):33.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boscarino JA, Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, Vlahov D. Mental health service and medication use in New York City after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;55:274–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCarter L, Goldman W. Use of psychotropics in two employee groups directly affected by the events of September 11. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53:1366–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams ML, Ford JD, Dailey WF. Predictors of help seeking among Connecticut adults after September 11, 2001. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1596–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Facing fear together: mental health and primary care in a time of terrorism. Blueprint Report, America’s Health Together; 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laraque D, Boscarino JA, Battista A, et al. Reactions and needs of tristate-area pediatricians after the events of September 11th: implications for children’s mental health services. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1357–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorder service system: epidemiologic catchment area prospective one-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanielian T, Stein B, Eisenman D, Keyser D, Olmstead S, Pincus H. Understanding and Preparing for the Mental Health Consequences of Bioterrorism. Report No. DRR-2919-RC. Santa Monica, Calif: The RAND Corporation; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Institute of Medicine. Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall MJ, Norwood AE, Ursano RJ, Fullerton CS. The psychological impacts of bioterrorism. Biosecurity Bioterrorism: Biodefense. Strategy Pract Sci. 2003;1:139–44.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demartino RM. Bioterrorism: what are we afraid of and what should we do? Paper presented at Biosecurity 2002 Conference, November 2002, Las Vegas, Nev.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clauw D, Engel C, Aronowitz R, et al. Unexplained symptoms after terrorism and war: an expert consensus statement. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:1040–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lacy TJ, Benedek DM. Terrorism and weapons of mass destruction: managing the behavioral reaction in primary care. South Med J. 2003;96:394–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, Styra R. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1206–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003;168:1245–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burstin H. Bioterrorism and health system preparedness: emerging tools, methods, and strategies. Web Conference, broadcast on April 29, 30, and May 1, 2002. Rockville, MD: Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/ulp/bioteleconf/.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pincus HA, Pechura CM, Elinson L, Pettit AR. Depression in primary care: linking clinical and systems strategies. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001;23:311–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Havenaar J, Rumyahtzeva G, Van Den Brink W, et al. Long-term mental health effects of the Chernobyl disaster: an epidemiologic survey in two former Soviet regions. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1605–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowler R, Mergler D, Huel G, Cone JE. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychophysiological sequelae in a community affected by a railroad chemical disaster. J Traumatic Stress. 1994;7:601–24.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kawana N, Ishimatsu S, Kanda K. Psycho-physiological effects of the terrorist Sarin attack on the Tokyo subway system. Mil Med. 2001;166(12 suppl):23–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kovalchick DF, Burgess JL, Kyes KB, et al. Psychological effects of hazardous materials exposure. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:841–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schuster MA, Stein BD, Jaycox L, et al. A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1507–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boscarino JA, Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, Vlahov D. Psychiatric medication use among Manhattan residents following the World. J Traum Stress. 2003;16:301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terr LC, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Shi H, Reinhardt JA, Metayer S. Children’s symptoms in the wake of Challenger: a field study of distant-traumatic effects and an outline of related conditions. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1536–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pfefferbaum B, Seale TW, McDonald NB, et al. Posttraumatic stress two years after the Oklahoma City bombing in youths geographically distant from the explosion. Psychiatry. 2000;63:358–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith DW, Christiansen EH, Vincent R, Hann NE. Population effects of the bombing of Oklahoma City. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999;92:193–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schlenger WE, Caddell JM, Ebert L, et al. Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the national study of Americans’ reactions to September 11. JAMA. 2002;288:581–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silver RC, Holman EA, McIntosh DN, Poulin M, Gil-Rivas V. Nation-wide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA. 2002;288:1235–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rippen HE, Gursky E, Stoto MA. Importance of bioterrorism preparedness for family physicians. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:1877–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lemkau JP, Mann B, Little D, Whitecar P, Hershberger P, Schumm JA. A questionnaire survey of family practice physicians’ perceptions of bereavement care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:822–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wunsch-Hitzig R, Plapinger J, Draper J, del Campo E. Calls for help after September 11: a community mental health hot line. J Urban Health. 2002;79:417–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stein BD, Tanielian TL, Ryan GW, Rhodes HJ, Young SD, Blanchard JC. A bitter pill to swallow: nonadherence with prophylactic antibiotics during the anthrax attacks and the role of private physicians. Biosecurity Bioterrorism. 2004;2:175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gerberding JL, Hughes JM, Koplan JP. Bioterrorism preparedness and response: clinicians and public health agencies as essential partners. JAMA. 2002;287:898–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bioterrorism: Public Health Response to Anthrax Incidents of 2001. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office October; 2003, GAO-04-152.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shaffer D, Armstrong G, Higgins K, et al. Increased US prescription trends associated with the CDC Bacillus anthracis antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis campaign. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12:177–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pastel RH. Collective behaviors: mass panic and outbreaks of multiple unexplained symptoms. Mil Med. 2001;166(12 suppl):44–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Diamond D, Schreiber M. Terrorism Agent Information and Treatment Guidelines for Clinicians and Hospitals. Los Angeles: County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services; 2003.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. 1999;281:1735–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    DiGiovanni C Jr. Domestic terrorism with chemical or biological agents: psychiatric aspects. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1500–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cymet TC, Kerkvliet GJ. Inhalational anthrax: the natural history of a treatable disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003;103:390.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shane S. Anthrax survivors find life a struggle. Baltimore Sun; September 18, 2003.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reissman DB, Whitney EA, Taylor TH Jr, et al. One-year health assessment of adult survivors of Bacillus anthracis infection. JAMA. 2004;291:1994–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hassett AL, Sigal LH. Unforeseen consequences of terrorism: medically unexplained symptoms in a time of fear. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1809–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Styra R, Gold W, Robinson S. Post-traumatic stress disorder and quality of life in patients diagnosed with SARS. Paper presented at 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, Ill; September 14–17, 2003.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caulford P. SARS: aftermath of an outbreak. Lancet. 2003;362(1 suppl):2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fain RM, Schreier RA. Disaster, stress and the doctor. Med Educ. 1989;23:91–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Holtz TH, Salama P, Lopes Cardozo B, Gotway CA. Mental health status of human rights workers. Kosovo J Trauma Stress. 2002;15:389–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Grieger TA, Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, and perceived safety after the terrorist attack on the Pentagon. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:1380–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Coyne J, Thompson R, Klinkman M, Nease D. Emotional disorders in primary care. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:798–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goldberg D. A classification of psychological distress for use in primary care settings. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:189–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schnurr PP, Friedman MJ, Sengupta A, Jankowski MK, Holmes T. PTSD and utilization of medical treatment services among male Vietnam veterans. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188:496–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schnurr PP, Spiro A III, Paris AH. Physician-diagnosed medical disorders in relation to PTSD symptoms in older male military veterans. Health Psychol. 2000;19:91–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Klerman GLWM, Ouellette R, Johnson J, Greenwald S. Panic attacks in the community. Social morbidity and health care utilization. JAMA. 1991;265:742–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Escobar JI, Canino G, Rubio Stipec M, Bravo M. Somatic symptoms after a natural disaster: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:965–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Escobar J, Burnam MA, Karno M, Forsythe A, Golding JM. Somatization in the community. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:713–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Webb G, Hennrikus DJ, Kelman GR, Gibberd RW, Sanson-Fisher R. The relationships between high-risk and problem drinking and the occurrence of work injuries and related absences. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55:434–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Becker SM. Meeting the threat of weapons of mass destruction terrorism: toward a broader conception of consequence management. Mil Med. 2001;166(12 suppl):13–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Blendon RJ, Benson JM, DesRoches CM, Pollard WE, Parvanta C, Herrmann MJ. The impact of anthrax attacks on the American public. Med Gen Med. 2002;4:1.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    McCauley J, Yurk RA, Jenckes MW, Ford DE. Inside “Pandora’s box”: abused women’s experiences with clinicians and health services. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:549–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sugg N, Inui T. Primary care physicians’ response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora’ box. JAMA. 1992;3157–60.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Parsons LH, Zaccaro D, Wells B, Stovall TG. Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:381–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    DiGiovanni C Jr, Reynolds B, Harwell R, Stonecipher EB, Burkle FM Jr. Community reaction to bioterrorism: prospective study of simulated outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:708–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Haq C, Steele DJ, Marchand L, Seibert C, Brody D. Integrating the art and science of medical practice: innovations in teaching medical communication skills. Fam Med. 2004;36(suppl):S43–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Olsen CG. Good grief. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:833–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jack K, Glied S. The public costs of mental health response: lessons from the New York City post-9/11 needs assessment. J Urban Health. 2002;79:332–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Becker SM. Are the psychosocial aspects of weapons of mass destruction incidents addressed in the Federal Response Plan: summary of an expert panel. Mil Med. 2001;166(12 suppl):66–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    National Resilience Development Act of 2003 H.R. 2370. 1st Session; 2003.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Siegel C, Wanderling J, Laska E. Coping with disasters: estimation of additional capacity of the mental health sector to meet extended service demands. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2004;7:29–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Beitsch L. Bioterrorism and health system preparedness: emerging tools, methods, and strategies. Web Conference, Broadcast on April 29, 30, and May 1, 2002. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/ulp/bioteleconf/.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hoge CW, Orman DT, Robichaux RJ, et al. Operation solace: overview of the mental health intervention following the September 11, 2001 Pentagon attack. Mil Med. 2002;167(9 suppl):44–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Engel CC, Katon W. Population and Need-Based Prevention of Unexplained Symptoms in the Community. Strategies to Protect the Health of Deployed U.S. Forces: Medical Surveillance, Record Keeping, and Risk Reduction. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999:173–212.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Engel CC Jr. Outbreaks of medically unexplained physical symptoms after military action, terrorist threat, or technological disaster. Mil Med. 2001;166(12 suppl):47–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Meehan PJ. Bioterrorism and health system preparedness: emerging tools, methods, and strategies. Web Conference, Broadcast on April 29, 30, and May 1, 2002. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/ulp/bioteleconf/.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bradford R, John AM. The psychological effects of disaster work: implications for disaster planning. J R Soc Health. 1991;111:107–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. Eisenman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bradley D. Stein
    • 3
    • 4
  • Terri L. Tanielian
    • 3
  • Harold Alan Pincus
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of MedicineUCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.RAND Corporation, Health Sciences ProgramSanta MonicaUSA
  3. 3.Mental and Behavioral HealthCenter for Domestic and International Health Security, RAND Corporation, Health Sciences ProgramSanta MonicaUSA
  4. 4.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Senior Natural ScientistUSA
  6. 6.RAND Corporation, Health Sciences ProgramPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations