Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 953–957 | Cite as

A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care

  • Karen Davis
  • Stephen C. Schoenbaum
  • Anne-Marie Audet
Health Policy

Abstract

Patient-centered care has received new prominence with its inclusion by the Institute of Medicine as 1 of the 6 aims of quality. Seven attributes of patient-centered primary care are proposed here to improve this dimension of care: access to care, patient engagement in care, information systems, care coordination, integrated and comprehensive team care, patient-centered care surveys, and publicly available information. The Commonwealth Fund 2003 National Survey of Physicians and Quality of Care finds that one fourth of primary care physicians currently incorporate these various patient-centered attributes in their practices. To bring about marked improvement will require a new system of primary care payment that blends monthly patient panel fees with traditional fee-for-service payment, and new incentives for patient-centered care performance. A major effort to test this concept, develop a business case, provide technical assistance and training, and diffuse best practices is needed to transform American health care.

Key Words

patient-centered care primary care quality of care 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Vol. 6. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum SC. A 2020 vision of American health care. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL. Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delbanco TL, Berwick DM, Boufford JL, et al. Healthcare in a land called peoplepower: nothing about me without me. Health Expect. 2001;4:144–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berwick D. Escape Fire. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Earnest MA, Ross SE, Moore LA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Use of a patient-accessible medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:410–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Providing an online medical record to patients with congestive heart failure: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:el 2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Physicians’ Views on Quality of Care: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund National Survey of Physicians and Quality of Care. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wasson JH, Benjamin R. How’s Your Health? What You Can do to Make Your Health and Health Care Better. New Hampshire: FNX Corporation; 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shelton L, Aiuppa L, Torda P. Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Physician Directory Information on the Internet. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson M. The Institute of Medicine Report. A manpower policy for primary health care: a commentary from the American College of Physicians. Introduction and discussion. Ann Intern Med. 1980;84:843–51.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Showstack J, Rothman AA, Hassmiller SB. The Future of Primary Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safran DG. Primary care performance: views from the patient. In: Showstack J, Rothman AA, Hassmiller SB, eds. The Future of Primary Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2004:17–39.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larson EB, Finn SD, Kirk LM, et al. The future of general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:69–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(suppl 1):S3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. The medical home. Pediatrics. 2003;110:184–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1493–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291:1246–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berry LL, Seiders K, Wilder SS. Innovations in access to care: a patient-centered approach. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:568–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murray M, Berwick DM. Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:1035–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K. Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. JAMA. 2003;289:1042–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kasper JE, Mulley AG Jr, Wennberg JE. Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:183–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ross SE, Lin CT. The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. JAMA. 2003;10:129–38.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, et al. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual physicians. J Gen Intern Med (abstract). 2004;19(suppl):177.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bethell C, Peck C, Schor E. Assessing health system provision of well-child care: the promoting healthy development survey. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1084–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gordon P, Chin M. Achieving a New Standard in Primary Care for Low-Income Populations: Case Studies of Redesign and Change Through a Learning Collaborative. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis K. The Danish health system through an American lens. Health Policy. 2002;59:119–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith PC, York N. Quality incentives: the case of U.K. general practitioners. Health Affairs (Milwood). 2004;23:112–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HSR, Landon B. Paying for quality: providers’ incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs (Milwood). 2004;23:127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sandy LG, Schroeder SA. Primary care in a new era: disillusion and dissolution? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:262–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Landon BE, Reschovsky J, Blumenthal D. Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:442–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:244–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Newhouse JP. Rate adjusters for medicare under capitation. Health Care Financing Rev. 1986;(Spec No):45–55.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reinhardt UE. “Boutique Medicine” in the US. BMJ. 2002;324:1335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). AHRQ Health Information Technology Programs. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/hitfact.htm. Accessed April 4, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Davis
    • 1
  • Stephen C. Schoenbaum
    • 1
  • Anne-Marie Audet
    • 1
  1. 1.The Commonwealth FundNew York

Personalised recommendations