The role of cultural diversity climate in recruitment, promotion, and retention of faculty in academic medicine
- 591 Downloads
BACKGROUND: Ethnic diversity among physicians may be linked to improved access and quality of care for minorities. Academic medical institutions are challenged to increase representation of ethnic minorities among health professionals.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceptions of physician faculty regarding the following: (1) the institution’s cultural diversity climate and (2) facilitators and barriers to success and professional satisfaction in academic medicine within this context.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews.
PARTICIPANTS: Nontenured physicians in the tenure track at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
APPROACH: Focus groups and interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and reviewed for thematic content in a 3-stage independent review/adjudication process.
RESULTS: Study participants included 29 faculty representing 9 clinical departments, 4 career tracks, and 4 ethnic groups. In defining cultural diversity, faculty noted visible (race/ethnicity, foreign-born status, gender) and invisible (religion, sexual orientation) dimensions. They believe visible dimensions provoke bias and cumulative advantages or disadvantages in the workplace. Minority and foreign-born faculty report ethnicity-based disparities in recruitment and subtle manifestations of bias in the promotion process. Minority and majority faculty agree that ethnic differences in prior educational opportunities lead to disparities in exposure to career options, and qualifications for and subsequent recruitment to training programs and faculty positions. Minority faculty also describe structural barriers (poor retention efforts, lack of mentorship) that hinder their success and professional satisfaction after recruitment. To effectively manage the diversity climate, our faculty recommended 4 strategies for improving the psychological climate and structural diversity of the institution.
CONCLUSIONS: Soliciting input from faculty provides tangible ideas regarding interventions to improve an institution’s diversity climate.
Key wordscultural diversity academic medicine ethnic minorities recruitment promotion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 2.Cooper LA, Powe NR. Disparities in Patient Experiences, Healthcare Processes, and Outcomes: The Role of Patient-Provider Racial, Ethnic, and Language Concordance. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund (Publication #753); 2004.Google Scholar
- 8.Institute of Medicine. In the Nation’s Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity in the Health Care Workforce. In: Smedley BD, Butler AS, Bristow LR, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 9.Association of American Medical Colleges. “Underrepresented in medicine definition.” http://www.aamc.org/meded/urm/start.htm. Accessed September 18, 2004.Google Scholar
- 15.Brigh CM, Duefield CA, Stone VE. Perceived barriers and biases in the medical education experience by gender and race. J Natl Med Assoc. 1998;90:681–8.Google Scholar
- 18.Hurtado S, Milem J, Clayton-Peterson A, Allen W. Enacting diverse learning environments: improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Volume 26, No. 8. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development; 1999.Google Scholar
- 20.DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Mills RJ U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-226, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2004.Google Scholar
- 22.Thomas DA. The truth about mentoring minorities: race matters. Harvard Bus Rev. 2001;79:98–107.Google Scholar
- 25.Thomas DA, Ely RJ. Making differences matter: a new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Bus Rev. 1996;74:79–90.Google Scholar